Ruth Bader Ginsberg Dead at 87

But, if what you say is true, then I guess the obvious follow-on question is, "When is the time to play fair and/or be magnanimous?" ... we are Americans after all; and back in the 1950's when I was growing up, that's one of the things we prided ourselves on. Pragmatically, of course, we never were magnanimous nor fair - but we at least pretended to be.

Perhaps never again. The left has won academia, Hollywood, Wall Street, pop-culture, and the mainstream media. They've also made major inroads with the court system. They have become so emboldened that they want non-leftists vanquished.

The only way forward is for a right wing/libertarian alliance that will completely eviscerate the left. NOW is the time.
 
Thanks for that. It's spot on. This isn't about being principled, or even consistent. It's about the exercise of political power. Political power is easier to identify when the other side is not being principled or consistent - such as when the Democrats passed the Affordable Care Act by a simple majority rather than constraining themselves to the cloture rules necessary to pass the Senate.

But, if what you say is true, then I guess the obvious follow-on question is, "When is the time to play fair and/or be magnanimous?" ... we are Americans after all; and back in the 1950's when I was growing up, that's one of the things we prided ourselves on. Pragmatically, of course, we never were magnanimous nor fair - but we at least pretended to be.

I think the time for that ended when they started commiting acts of war against the country with impunity.
 
RBG-Roe-v-Wade-meme.jpg

Carter, a Southern Democrat appointed her.

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/jimmy-carters-racist-campaign-of-1970-1070336

Readers should refer to Stephen Hayward's The Real Jimmy Carter if they want a taste of the out-and-out racism that Carter employed in order to defeat moderate former Gov. Carl Sanders for the Democratic nomination that year. As Hayward's book points out:

Carter's top campaign staffers were spotted distributing grainy photographs of Sanders arm-in-arm celebrating with two black men. Sanders was a part-owner of the Atlanta Hawks, and in the photograph he was celebrating a victory with two players who were pouring champagne over his head. Carter's leaflet was intended to depress Sanders's white vote.
"The Carter campaign also produced a leaflet noting that Sanders had paid tribute to Martin Luther King, Jr."
Carter criticized Sanders, a former governor, for preventing Alabama Gov. and notorious segregationist George Wallace from speaking on Georgia state property. "I don't think it was right for Governor Sanders to try to please a group of ultra-liberals, particularly those in Washington, when it means stifling communication with another state," said Carter.
"'I have no trouble pitching for Wallace votes and black votes at the same time,' Carter told a reporter. Carter also said to another reporter, 'I can win this election without a single black vote.'"
Upon receiving the endorsement of former Democratic Gov. Lester Maddox, Carter responded by praising the life-long segregationist: "He has brought a standard of forthright expression and personal honesty to the governor's office, and I hope to live up to his standard." Maddox had not only refused to serve blacks in the restaurant he once owned, but he had also greeted civil rights protestors with a gun, and made sticks available to his white customers with which to intimidate them.
"The campaign paid for radio ads for a fringe black candidate, C.B. King, in an effort to siphon black votes away from Sanders."
"Then there was the radio commercial in which Carter said he would never be the tool of any 'block' vote, slurring over the word 'block' so that it could be mistaken for 'black.'
Carter won the Democratic nomination and the governorship -- unsurprisingly, with almost no black support. He famously did not carry the racism of his 1970 campaign into his governorship. That is laudable, but his campaign was not. Nor is it laudable for him today to attribute his own racial cynicism to others who have ample reasons for legitimate political disagreement with this president.
 
Last edited:
Funny. Obama is now saying that Ginsburgs seat needs to be vacant until the election is over, even though he was singing a completely different tune back when Scalia died.

I've heard BO and AOC saying that RBG's dying wish should be respected and that's why the seat needs to stay vacant. :rolleyes:
 
I believe in diversity. Therefore I want a black, Protestant, constitutional originalist who can not be blackmailed. How far does that narrow the list?
 
I agree.

I'm not going to "dance on her grave" but I'm not going to heap praise on her either.

She was an "identity" politician disguised as a judge, who routinely ruled against the constitution and restrictions on government.

I'll dance for both of us:

iu
 
bring on the nominations, hearings and sex accusations. If the dems are who we all know they are, they will screw this up. The last time they did this brought Trump high approvals.

GOP should not just choose a woman for fear of sex accusations, choose a man and let the left hang themselves with their own rope.
 
Thanks for that. It's spot on. This isn't about being principled, or even consistent. It's about the exercise of political power. Political power is easier to identify when the other side is not being principled or consistent - such as when the Democrats passed the Affordable Care Act by a simple majority rather than constraining themselves to the cloture rules necessary to pass the Senate.

But, if what you say is true, then I guess the obvious follow-on question is, "When is the time to play fair and/or be magnanimous?" ... we are Americans after all; and back in the 1950's when I was growing up, that's one of the things we prided ourselves on. Pragmatically, of course, we never were magnanimous nor fair - but we at least pretended to be.
The time to play fair and be magnanimous is when the other side plays by the same rules, the left hasn't done that in generations.
 
I believe in diversity. Therefore I want a black, Protestant, constitutional originalist who can not be blackmailed. How far does that narrow the list?
I am not a Protestant, nor do I get overly obsessed with diversity, but that is curious that the vast majority of the founders were Protestant and yet there hasn't been one on the bench in years.

As for originalists, that lack has been needing to be fixed for far longer.
 
Also, for diversity reasons, I notice that the SCOTUS women are fairly ugly. Amy and Britt are kind of pretty. So, for diversity reasons, I am for a hot chick on the SC.
 
Back
Top