Rudy Giuliani: ‘Hillary Clinton Could Be Considered A Founding Member Of ISIS’

timosman

Banned
Joined
Dec 28, 2011
Messages
29,090
Rudy Giuliani: ‘Hillary Clinton Could Be Considered A Founding Member Of ISIS’

http://newyork.cbslocal.com/2016/03/23/rudy-giuliani-hillary-clinton-isis/



March 23, 2016 9:44 PM

NEW YORK (CBSNewYork/AP) — Former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani claims that Democratic presidential hopeful Hillary Clinton played a hand in the rise of the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria.

“She helped create ISIS. Hillary Clinton could be considered a founding member of ISIS,” Giuliani told Fox News’ “The O’Reilly Factor.”

The former Republican presidential candidate pointed the finger at the Obama administration for allowing ISIS to run rampant.

“By being part of an administration that withdrew from Iraq, by being part of an administration that let [former Prime Minister Nouri] al-Maliki run Iraq into the ground, so you forced the Shiites to make a choice,” Giuliani said. “By not intervening in Syria at the proper time, by being part of an administration that drew 12 lines in the sand and made a joke about it.”

Giuliani said he was “embarrassed” that President Barack Obama stayed in Cuba and not come back to Washington following the deadly terror attacks in Brussels that left more than 30 dead and 200 wounded.

“Her president was sitting at a baseball game doing the wave and laughing, instead of trying to rally the West against ISIS on the day of this killing took place,” he told Fox News. “What he did yesterday embarrassed me as an American.”

The former mayor believes Republican presidential candidates Donald Trump or Sen. Ted Cruz would be the best to handle the terror group.

“I think Trump and Cruz have probably been the most specific on it, as specific as you would expect at this level of the campaign. There’s no question they would take the war to ISIS, exactly how’d they do it, they probably don’t know yet,” Giuliani said, adding that he would prefer the billionaire over the Texas senator.

In a speech Wednesday at Stanford University, Clinton called for “strong, smart, steady leadership,” arguing that recent comments from Trump and Cruz show they are not up to the task of combatting Islamic militants.

“Turning our back on our alliances, or turning our alliance into a protection racket would reverse decades of bipartisan American leadership and send a dangerous signal to friend and foe alike,” she said, referencing a call by Trump to lessen U.S. involvement in NATO. “Putin already hopes to divide Europe. If Mr. Trump gets his way, it will be like Christmas in the Kremlin.”

Clinton also assailed Cruz’s call for patrolling Muslim neighborhoods.

“When Republican candidates like Ted Cruz call for treating American Muslims like criminals and for racially profiling predominantly Muslim neighborhoods, it’s wrong, it’s counterproductive, it’s dangerous,” Clinton said.

The Associated Press reported Wednesday ISIS has trained at least 400 fighters to target Europe in deadly waves of attacks.

Two of the three suicide bombers in Tuesday’s attacks, Belgian-born brothers Ibrahim and Khalid El Bakraoui, were known to authorities as common criminals, not anti-Western radicals until an apartment one of them rented was traced to Abdeslam last week, according to Belgian state broadcaster RTBF. Similarly, an Algerian killed inside that apartment on March 15 had nothing but a petty theft record in Sweden — but he’d signed up as an ISIS suicide bomber for the group in 2014 and returned to Europe as part of the Nov. 13 plot.

In claiming responsibility for Tuesday’s attack, ISIS described a “secret cell of soldiers” dispatched to Brussels for the purpose. The shadowy cells were confirmed by the EU police agency, Europol, which said in a late January report that intelligence officials believed the group had “developed an external action command trained for special forces-style attacks.”
 
“By being part of an administration that withdrew from Iraq, by being part of an administration that let [former Prime Minister Nouri] al-Maliki run Iraq into the ground, so you forced the Shiites to make a choice,” Giuliani said. “By not intervening in Syria at the proper time, by being part of an administration that drew 12 lines in the sand and made a joke about it.”
So more intervention would have prevented ISIS? Got it. Thanks Rudy
:rolleyes:

The SOFA was done under Bush II. Obama actually wanted al-Maliki to sign a new SOFA so American troops would stay in Iraq longer. al-Maliki refused and Obama had to withdraw most of the troops from Iraq.

Guiliani would never blame Bush/Cheney for ISIS.
 

So more intervention would have prevented ISIS? Got it. Thanks Rudy
:rolleyes:

The SOFA was done under Bush II. Obama actually wanted al-Maliki to sign a new SOFA so American troops would stay in Iraq longer. al-Maliki refused and Obama had to withdraw most of the troops from Iraq.

Guiliani would never blame Bush/Cheney for ISIS.

To be technical, Bush/Cheney was less directly involved in the creation of ISIS (though they were indeed responsible). The Obama administration were the ones that pushed for the ouster of Assad and send all of those weapons into Syria. Don't get me wrong, Guiliani is right for the wrong reasons, but Hillary Clinton was the chief proponent of funneling weapons to the so-called Free Syrian Army, which was basically ISIS under a different name.

Lol, I suspect you only read the headline and did not look at his reasoning.

Parts of what he's saying in the article are also accurate. Once the situation in Iraq got screwed up to the extent it did, withdrawing basically solidified ISIS's dominance in the part of Iraq where they made gains. Not invading Iraq would have avoided this, but once the damage was done, Obama essentially made the problem worse by leaving Iraq a train-wreck and then going after Assad. Not that Rudy was against toppling Assad, it's more of him being right by accident than him having the right principles.
 
Last edited:
To be technical, Bush/Cheney was less directly involved in the creation of ISIS (though they were indeed responsible). The Obama administration were the ones that pushed for the ouster of Assad and send all of those weapons into Syria. Don't get me wrong, Guiliani is right for the wrong reasons, but Hillary Clinton was the chief proponent of funneling weapons to the so-called Free Syrian Army, which was basically ISIS under a different name.

Agree with that.
 
As much as I abhor Clinton, anything Giuliani says automatically has an agenda attached to it. He and his cohorts are probably behind a lot of so called terrorists. He profits from fear.
 
Back
Top