Rubio is more dangerous than HRC

[AuH20]

Thoughts? A republican congress with Rubio could prove devastating. Secondly, this would mark the backdoor return of Bush republicanism to the White House with a multicultural flair. The same stinky product in a shiny new bottle.

 

[CPUd]

 

[Dr.3D]

Shhhhhh, that's supposed to be a secret.

 

[Libertas Aut Mortis]

I actually agree. The GOP will play Politics against Clinton...but they would literally do whatever Rubio tells them.

Besides, Clinton may cause the GOP to implode....which would be fantasic. We cannot allow GOP neoconservatives the Presidency.

 

[Todd]

ALL of them will probably start WWIII and bankrupt the country. The means by which they do this are just a sideshow.

Multiculturalism is part of the side show and a distraction.

 

[AuH20]

In terms of potential damage, I would rank the current candidates as the following:

1. Rubio
2. HRC
3 a/b. Cruz Sanders
4. Kasich
5. Trump

 

[Libertas Aut Mortis]

In terms of potential damage, I would rank the current candidates as the following:

1. Rubio
2. HRC
3 a/b. Cruz Sanders
4. Kasich
5. Trump

Again, I agree.

 

[Warlord]

Rubio is a lightweight. He's getting no where near the presidency so don't worry

 

[thoughtomator]

It's not like the GOP Congress has done a damn thing to stop Obama.

A GOP Congress opposing the policies of a Democrat President is a myth. In real life, it doesn't play out that way. All the nominees will be confirmed, all policies passed into law (if with some riders giving key Congressmen benefits), no serious oversight of the executive branch will happen, and so on.

Don't believe me? Take a good, long, close look at the past 5 years.

 

[squirl22]

In terms of potential damage, I would rank the current candidates as the following:

1. Rubio
2. HRC
3 a/b. Cruz Sanders
4. Kasich
5. Trump

I agree. What I like about Trump is that he hopefully will drive the neocons out of the GOP, maybe out of politics... I wish.