When it's all said and done, Ron Paul's answers came off as intelligent and coherent contrasted against the straight neo-con line from the other 5.
The other 5 came off as a bunch of high school jocks teasing the smart kid with all the right answers.
I already saw one blog post:
Also, Ron Paul was smart to quit when he knew he was ahead. Then the other 5 took to attacking each other. Their attacks on each other were far more successful than their attempts on Ron Paul.
Look for a bump in the polls tomorrow.
The other 5 came off as a bunch of high school jocks teasing the smart kid with all the right answers.
I already saw one blog post:
Plenty of Ron Paul critics note that his substantive views are pretty crazy, and I think that's just about right. But his views, as announced at this debate, are far, far more coherent than his competitors' views. And yet his competitors hear what he says and just mock him.
Also, Ron Paul was smart to quit when he knew he was ahead. Then the other 5 took to attacking each other. Their attacks on each other were far more successful than their attempts on Ron Paul.
Look for a bump in the polls tomorrow.