The "Paul is the only candidate who (consistenty) did ____" is a good way to attack the rest of the field without specifically attacking one candidate and seeming negative. And there are PLENTY of things to fill the blank with.
The "Paul is the only candidate who (consistenty) did ____" is a good way to attack the rest of the field without specifically attacking one candidate and seeming negative. And there are PLENTY of things to fill the blank with.
To a certain extent I agree, especially via his online social sites. However, in debates and in interviews he needs to clearly establish himself as having predicted the economic problems and his anti-Tarp stance all the while the others were not saying anything or actually supporting things like tarp, obamacare, cap and trade, etc. Not that I want him outside of his comfort zone too much but at some point he needs to really push the alarm bell (preferably in a debate) with regards to the economy and wonder out loud if any candidate other than him understands what got us into this mess and where the hell were they in the build up to current events.. For instance, why has no other candidate called for reigning in the Fed or even mentioned it on the campaign trail unless asked about it. Somehow, these others need to be called for their platitude speeches and lip service stances and the only way to get the point across to gop primary voters is to call them out cause they sure won't stop the bs on their own.
