yuck
RP on FOX NEWS Channel 4pm
- Thread starter ronpaul.in
- Start date
yuck
2young2vote
Member
- Joined
- Aug 16, 2007
- Messages
- 1,852
One thing that i noticed is that in the old interview Cavuto just attacked Ron at every chance he got. But in this interview he actually gave an easy interview which tells me something. When a political top tier candidate is interviewed the interview is usually easy or scripted (like hillary campaign telling Wolf Blitzer to not beat on her in the debate) because if the person wins the presidency they may reject interviews as president to that network so they take it easy on them. I am thinking he took it easy on him because they know he actually has a chance now (although i don't think Ron would reject an interview as president).
shasshas
Banned
- Joined
- Nov 25, 2007
- Messages
- 398
1) I think we need to message the Head Editors of Faux and tell them we are viewers are annoyed that they get their facts wrong and interview presidential candidates like Ron Paul in an insualting way.
2) Can we get a bit more of Ron Pauls Xmas ad out on the national MSM? I know Ron Paul doesn'tbelieve in warm and fuzzy promotions but.. well it does help a bit.
3) Ron Paul asnwered that rude reporter really really well !!! Its snowing wherre he is so lets all hope he keeps warm.
Can someone find a link to email or meesage faux news head ediotrs who are in charge of neil cavuto?
2) Can we get a bit more of Ron Pauls Xmas ad out on the national MSM? I know Ron Paul doesn'tbelieve in warm and fuzzy promotions but.. well it does help a bit.
3) Ron Paul asnwered that rude reporter really really well !!! Its snowing wherre he is so lets all hope he keeps warm.
Can someone find a link to email or meesage faux news head ediotrs who are in charge of neil cavuto?
ButchHowdy
Member
- Joined
- May 12, 2007
- Messages
- 1,008
Thank you IHSV for staying on top of things!!
RonPaulJunkie
Member
- Joined
- Nov 14, 2007
- Messages
- 151
Ron sure knows how to make these reporters look like complete idiots. Then again, they seem to do most of the work themselves.
LibertyForAll
Member
- Joined
- Dec 12, 2007
- Messages
- 485
madRazor
Member
- Joined
- Nov 8, 2007
- Messages
- 190
I remember this. But I believe it was on Fox Business Channel, not the "News" channel. Pandering to different audiences, just like all the other candidates...
HazardPerry
Member
- Joined
- Nov 15, 2007
- Messages
- 407
I don't know if the interview was worthless. To anybody with a brain, Paul looked like the one person who wasn't going to snuggle up and try to smooch their way into Washington. He called them out for being losers who trick people with a fireplace and a smile, then turn around and flush their money down the toilet when they get into office. Paul himself had a Christmas ad out before these jokers did, and you'll notice Fox didn't run it. For once their insistent pandering came in handy. Paul looked like the only guy who would shake his head and tell it like it is.
Then Cavuto dropped the donor bomb. I'm so tired of hearing this, and to be honest Cavuto seemed to be somewhat mollified after hearing Paul's response. Paul is absolutely right. It's not like the white supremacist is giving him money earmarked to burn down churches or something. If he wants to give up his money for Dr. Paul, that is $500 far better spent. Not to mention the secondary fact that it is nigh-impossible, and besides inconsiderate, to root around in every single donor's background. Cavuto's reading on-air of the guys name and address was really low. Plus, our man drove the point home with a barb in the direction of the lobbyists and special interests.
Mindless maniacs who want to hug their TV just to feel close to that toad Huckabee aren't going to roll over for Ron Paul anyway. RP attracts people by speaking his mind, because no matter what he has to say, there is an instant recognition that he means it. That is so shocking that many people react favourably almost on the spot. I think this is good for us.
In other words, RWNED!
Then Cavuto dropped the donor bomb. I'm so tired of hearing this, and to be honest Cavuto seemed to be somewhat mollified after hearing Paul's response. Paul is absolutely right. It's not like the white supremacist is giving him money earmarked to burn down churches or something. If he wants to give up his money for Dr. Paul, that is $500 far better spent. Not to mention the secondary fact that it is nigh-impossible, and besides inconsiderate, to root around in every single donor's background. Cavuto's reading on-air of the guys name and address was really low. Plus, our man drove the point home with a barb in the direction of the lobbyists and special interests.
Mindless maniacs who want to hug their TV just to feel close to that toad Huckabee aren't going to roll over for Ron Paul anyway. RP attracts people by speaking his mind, because no matter what he has to say, there is an instant recognition that he means it. That is so shocking that many people react favourably almost on the spot. I think this is good for us.
In other words, RWNED!
Ozwest
Member
- Joined
- Aug 14, 2007
- Messages
- 7,898
Sorry mate, not overly impressed.Everytime you clicked "ok" it the pop up would give you the next line of lyrics to the song. When the song ended it gave you the option to leave. Nothing malicious at all.
Falseflagop
Member
- Joined
- Jul 13, 2007
- Messages
- 1,750
I hate that f-t asswipe!
Spot on!
They can always fall back on the safe one-word answers to one-word questions.
Reporter: "Ready?"
RP: "I'm ready."
Reporter: "Isolationist?"
RP: "Boo."
Last edited:
I think that if Dr. Paul keeps responding to the 'racist' 'angle of attack' like he did today at the end of the Fox interview with Cavuto (re: 'the really evil thing is money from the MIC and special interest") it will be a tremendous boon to the campaign..
Like most earlier attacks against Paul.. they are only helping him expose yet another serious flaw with the current system of federal governance (re: Special interest $$)
;]
In other words.. this was an AMAZING interview
Like most earlier attacks against Paul.. they are only helping him expose yet another serious flaw with the current system of federal governance (re: Special interest $$)
;]
In other words.. this was an AMAZING interview
I think you are right. I have heard the media doing things like this in the past.
WilliamC
Member
- Joined
- Nov 27, 2007
- Messages
- 6,682
Greetings All,
This is my email to Neil.
"Nice Try Neil"
Greetings Mr. Cavuto (and staff),
I just watched your 12/19/2007 interview of Congressman Ron Paul on YouTube
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CrRtZaG63o8. First of all, do you and your staff
have internet access? If so you would find this add from Congressman Paul
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XZPCWGtIupE. It really speaks to your credibility for you not to have know about this or show it in your montage, especially when it was released before Huckabee's Christmas add.
Also, do you think you could try just a little harder to make a complete fool of
yourself by asking him one more time about a single $500 donation? After all you
well know he has had over 100,000 people donate over $18,000,000 to his campaign this quarter alone. Or is this another example of the lack of research your staff does before interviews?
Please, next time, why not ask him a serious question about his policies and
politics? To quote from your very own words in a recent story
(http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,317389,00.html)
"Because this nanny state costs us our freedom, our self respect, our very
being. They don't tell you that when they help you. You only see it after the
fact, when they own you."
Try asking Congressman Paul's opinion about big government and the nanny state
sometime, if you are honestly interested in someone who's voting record on the
topic speaks louder than your empty rhetoric.
Sincerely,
William C Colley
xxx
xxx
This is my email to Neil.
"Nice Try Neil"
Greetings Mr. Cavuto (and staff),
I just watched your 12/19/2007 interview of Congressman Ron Paul on YouTube
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CrRtZaG63o8. First of all, do you and your staff
have internet access? If so you would find this add from Congressman Paul
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XZPCWGtIupE. It really speaks to your credibility for you not to have know about this or show it in your montage, especially when it was released before Huckabee's Christmas add.
Also, do you think you could try just a little harder to make a complete fool of
yourself by asking him one more time about a single $500 donation? After all you
well know he has had over 100,000 people donate over $18,000,000 to his campaign this quarter alone. Or is this another example of the lack of research your staff does before interviews?
Please, next time, why not ask him a serious question about his policies and
politics? To quote from your very own words in a recent story
(http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,317389,00.html)
"Because this nanny state costs us our freedom, our self respect, our very
being. They don't tell you that when they help you. You only see it after the
fact, when they own you."
Try asking Congressman Paul's opinion about big government and the nanny state
sometime, if you are honestly interested in someone who's voting record on the
topic speaks louder than your empty rhetoric.
Sincerely,
William C Colley
xxx
xxx
ButchHowdy
Member
- Joined
- May 12, 2007
- Messages
- 1,008
Verrrrrrry Interesting!
Similar threads
