RP campaign slogan: "He can't win"

McCain "won": how and why?

Hate to break it to you but McCain did win.

Just how and why has McCain "won" so far? He has been pumped up by the main stream media and many Republicans have been suckered into voting for a man that doesn't have a prayer of a chance against Hillary or Obama in November.

He is the phony alternative "choice" created by those who desire a Democrat win in November.

The road ahead for the Ron Paul Revolution is incredibly difficult, but not impossible.
Never give up. The only Republican candidate who can win in November is Ron Paul.

McCain can't win..............
 
Just how and why has McCain "won" so far? He has been pumped up by the main stream media and many Republicans have been suckered into voting for a man that doesn't have a prayer of a chance against Hillary or Obama in November.

He is the phony alternative "choice" created by those who desire a Democrat win in November.

The road ahead for the Ron Paul Revolution is incredibly difficult, but not impossible.
Never give up. The only Republican candidate who can win in November is Ron Paul.

McCain can't win..............
Because McCain crossed the threshold of necessary delegates making it impossible for us to go to a brokered convention. It's over.
 
Love it!

McCain+He+Cant+Win.png

Great bumper sticker / sign addendum. Plan to place it along side my Ron Paul stickers/signs.

"He can't win" is an age old tactic used by power brokers to discourage support for any candidate they dislike, including, and especially, Ron Paul. I love using the tactic against them for a change.:cool:
 
I don't think you're doing Ron Paul any favors by making us look like sore losers.

Last time I checked, the GOP nomination convention has not yet been held. Ron Paul hasn't lost yet; And, genuine Ron Paul supporters are doing everything in their power to make it possible for Ron Paul to win at that convention.

John McCain can't win....What the polls say at this point is completely irrelevant.
Of course, I would expect main stream media polls to make it appear that McCain could actually defeat Hillary. Its all part of the scam....McCain can't win.

Ron Paul supporters need to double their efforts to reach Republican voters with our winning message....Ron Paul is the only Republican candidate that can defeat Hillary or Obama in November.

At this point it is either Ron Paul or John McCain and the truth is:

John McCain can't win.......
 
McCain won. So I picked someone else to vote for in the general.

Obama?

WTF???

That just doesn't compute for someone who understands & agrees with the message Ron Paul and this movement is trying to spread.

You can vote FOR a Fascist

You can vote FOR a Socialist

or

You can vote FOR a Libertarian

and you choose the Socialist?

WHY? :confused:
 
Obama?

WTF???

That just doesn't compute for someone who understands & agrees with the message Ron Paul and this movement is trying to spread.

You can vote FOR a Fascist

You can vote FOR a Socialist

or

You can vote FOR a Libertarian

and you choose the Socialist?

WHY? :confused:


Because there isn't a libertarian candidate who has held an elected office first. I like my candidate to have at least worked in Washington for a term and knows how the system works. You can't change it if you don't understand it. And I'd rather live in a 3rd world country than a country that believes in pre-emptive wars. So Obama is my choice. I don't agree with his economic plans but I agree with his government transparency plans and his foreign policy plans.
 
RP supporters don't give up

Because McCain crossed the threshold of necessary delegates making it impossible for us to go to a brokered convention. It's over.

For Ron Paul supporters on this forum - do not give up. It certainly is not over.
The media and supporters of other candidates, such as Obama, would dearly like to have you think so because they know that defeating John McCain in November would be like shooting fish in a barrel. They do not want to face Ron Paul in November; they would lose. Our job is to do everything possible to make their worst nightmare a reality. What matters is not the primaries as such, but the delegate count.
And, there are a lot of Ron Paul delegates out there ( and Romney & Huck delegates as well). McCain does not have the pledged delegate count he must have to win.

And, though the job is incredibly tough, it is still possible to get a win for Ron Paul at a brokered convention. Never give up.

John McCain can't win !
 
Because there isn't a libertarian candidate who has held an elected office first. I like my candidate to have at least worked in Washington for a term and knows how the system works. You can't change it if you don't understand it. And I'd rather live in a 3rd world country than a country that believes in pre-emptive wars. So Obama is my choice. I don't agree with his economic plans but I agree with his government transparency plans and his foreign policy plans.

His foreign policy plans include an open-ended stay in Iraq. Furthermore, there's no guarantee that McCain can even be sworn in.

I think you give up on having a decent choice at the polls a mite too soon. But we'll keep working with or without you.
 
Being an alien! I have watched with consternation as this whole show has played out. It really is surreal. Money used to matter but suddenly is does not! Suddenly candidates who are certain to fail, who had no money are winning and the candidate who the whole f**king world would want as your president, won the majority of your straw polls, was growing rather than shrinking in money, get no where. To say it smells a little fishy is an understatement! It looks to the greenhorn like a show and being manipulated to give drama, but the conclusion is Hillary. It really makes no difference in reality whether Hilary or Obama, but last night came as no surprise to me and I even predicted her comeback. Could I be more cynical!

wish I could help, see you all at the march in DC.
 
His foreign policy plans include an open-ended stay in Iraq. Furthermore, there's no guarantee that McCain can even be sworn in.

I think you give up on having a decent choice at the polls a mite too soon. But we'll keep working with or without you.
What evidence are you basing that open ended iraq statement? And at this point I wouldn't want McCain to lose.

It would be undemocratic to get Ron Paul in at this point. The people have spoken and I would have wanted them to speak for Ron Paul but I'm not going to force a leader on my country when it's obvious they don't want him right now. Instead I'd rather focus our efforts in getting more ron paul republicans in congress so we can educate people on what the republican platform SHOULD be and eventually it will be considered a serious platform.

I believe very strongly in democracy and that's why I really don't want to do anything to take the nomination from McCain right now. The people have spoken.
 
Obama will not guarantee having the troops home by 2012. Since he couldn't guarantee winning a second term, how much more open-ended can you get?

Many Republicans wanted Ron Paul but feel he can't win. Why wouldn't we give them what they wanted? How many Republicans really want McCain? Honestly? Telling them Paul can't win essentially disenfranchised them, even if they were complicit in their own disenfranchisement by their ignorance.

No, I don't think it would be immoral to do this thing at the convention. I see no guarantee McCain is Constitutionally eligible, anyway.

Besides, what about the independents who want a decent candidate? Do G.O.P. regulars count for more than they do? If so, why? Because they're more active? So are we...
 
I'd rather live in a 3rd world country than a country that believes in pre-emptive wars. So Obama is my choice. I don't agree with his economic plans but I agree with his government transparency plans and his foreign policy plans.
Economics, foreign policy and government transparency are all intertwined. If you really believe electing Obama over McCain or McCain over Obama is going to make a difference of ANY significance - you haven't learned much from Ron Paul and this movement. :mad:
 
Economics, foreign policy and government transparency are all intertwined. If you really believe electing Obama over McCain or McCain over Obama is going to make a difference of ANY significance - you haven't learned much from Ron Paul and this movement. :mad:
I don't think they will have very many long term differences as far as damages go. In fact I think they will both contribute to long term damages. But in the short term Obama is better.

I want to make sure McCain loses because then we have the best chance of coming home from Iraq. And that's my number one issue.
 
I don't think they will have very many long term differences as far as damages go. In fact I think they will both contribute to long term damages. But in the short term Obama is better.

I want to make sure McCain loses because then we have the best chance of coming home from Iraq. And that's my number one issue.

And then will come the next war. We, meanwhile, will keep trying to implement the long-term solution by continuing to build the numbers of those voting for sanity. Only thus will come liberty and sanity.

And yes, stubbornness is absolutely necessary.
 
Obama will not guarantee having the troops home by 2012. Since he couldn't guarantee winning a second term, how much more open-ended can you get?

Many Republicans wanted Ron Paul but feel he can't win. Why wouldn't we give them what they wanted? How many Republicans really want McCain? Honestly? Telling them Paul can't win essentially disenfranchised them, even if they were complicit in their own disenfranchisement by their ignorance.

No, I don't think it would be immoral to do this thing at the convention. I see no guarantee McCain is Constitutionally eligible, anyway.

Besides, what about the independents who want a decent candidate? Do G.O.P. regulars count for more than they do? If so, why? Because they're more active? So are we...

Regardless they voted the way they did. That's a democracy. And the voters count because they made up the majority. I will not support going against the popular vote. That's not democratic.
 
The point is, there is no way in hell that he could win the General Election.

I am still hoping for an upset at the convention.
Barring that, I will write in Ron Paul, and push that as an option to all that will listen.

And I will be preparing for the coming destruction of the United States.

+1
 
It's a moot point at this point. McCain is over the hump for the number of pledged delegates needed and will only increase that in the upcoming contests. The time for campaigning is over. The time to figure out where the movement goes from here has begun.

Hopefully, the movement will see it needs to unite in one place in order to be effective.
 
I want to make sure McCain loses because then we have the best chance of coming home from Iraq. And that's my number one issue.
That is probably my number one issue as well, but when Obama declared on national TV in that Democratic Party Debate that he was not willing to commit to have our troops out of IRAQ by 2012!!!!! - he lost all credibility on the issue.

You really should not vote FOR Obama if Peace, Prosperity and Freedom are important to you!
 
Back
Top