Ron Paul's NH Forum 1/6/08

The problem is that this whole big response to being excluded from the Fox News Forum will amount to being nothing more than a Youtube video. Not that Youtube videos aren't great, but Ron Paul needed to take a major stance and he needed to spend the money to be on a major TV station and be VISIBLE, and he needed to spend the money to do a professional job. There's no point in further preaching to the choir.

How do you propose he do that on such short notice? Airtime is sold weeks, if not months, in advance... i don't thin you're being reasonable with your criticism!
 
Maybe I'm too much of a "newbie" to say this, but please be patient.

I came to the RPForums board to see how my favorite candidate is doing and to get the "lowdown' on directing me to positive vids, news, etc. Much great stuff here, but I am concerned about the on-line negative "critiques" about the RP HQ campaign strategies. Wouldn't it be better to discuss those opinions in private messages, ladies and gentlemen that we should be? From my perspective, on-line bickering simply supplies food for fodder to the greatest antagonists of all, the MSM.
 
I think he missed a huge opportunity to get some exposure here.

Does anyone not agree that the biggest story out of this is the one that Fox brought on themselves and, the remaining 5 candidates, you know the other so-called "defenders of the constitution" that turned a blind eye to the ethical question of the protection of Dr. Paul's first amendment right to free speech that they, themselves are just as guilty of trampling on as Rupert Murdoch himself, and the democratic candidates too. Everyone involved in the election process should ethically and morally recused themselves from involvement in that shameful and ubsurd fiasco.
 
Does anyone not agree that the biggest story out of this is the one that Fox brought on themselves and, the remaining 5 candidates, you know the other so-called "defenders of the constitution" that turned a blind eye to the ethical question of the protection of Dr. Paul's first amendment right to free speech that they, themselves are just as guilty of trampling on as Rupert Murdoch himself, and the democratic candidates too. Everyone involved in the election process should ethically and morally recused themselves from involvement in that shameful and ubsurd fiasco.
1+
 
C-span!!!!!!!!!!1

We heard it was going to be on C-SPAN. When is that going to happen?
 
Last edited:
Does anyone not agree that the biggest story out of this is the one that Fox brought on themselves and, the remaining 5 candidates, you know the other so-called "defenders of the constitution" that turned a blind eye to the ethical question of the protection of Dr. Paul's first amendment right to free speech that they, themselves are just as guilty of trampling on as Rupert Murdoch himself, and the democratic candidates too. Everyone involved in the election process should ethically and morally recused themselves from involvement in that shameful and ubsurd fiasco.

I absolute agree 100% Listen, I have been a Democrat all my voting years, as well as some friends I meet weekly for breakfast. When I stumbled onto Dr. Paul, however, it was jaw dropping and I KNEW he was the candidate I wanted. I'm switching parties for this election, but I have not been able to convince my other Dem friends to look seriously into him. BUT, when the whole FAUX new story broke, they were all over me this morning with questions are are LIVID that this happened. They are doing their research on Dr. Paul now. YES! the FAUX shutout did way more than I was able to do to get my friends onboard the Ron Paul Peace Train. :)
 
Hey, anyone recall one of Fox's (and Shepard Smith's) excuses was that this forum is on a bus and just too small for everyone? Well, I held my nose and turned on the propaganda network for a look, and that ain't no bus, my friends.
 
Back
Top