That's what I think.
In fact, I don't think he'd use "extra money" for anything without consent from the donors.
So... we're supposed to believe that this guy with a 30 year record of doing the right thing would do something else? Just as people finally started listening to him? I doubt it.
He could have enriched himself beyond belief by now. The fact is... all he ever wanted was for people to listen to what he was saying. So, now that people are listening, he does something totally different? I don't think so.
You guys have to understand that a lot of your tax money is spent to influence you in various ways. The "Paul's going to take that money and run" scenario has been around for a long time. I'm a little pissed that it seems to be getting some support here. I never donated for a publishing company. Neither did anyone else.
Now some of you seem to be buying into this bullshit. Stop it, please. Most of us will donate for a publishing company when asked. Until then, you're buying into stupid shit whether pro or con.