Question
When Ron Paul says there will be no marching orders from the top down where does that leave the revolution? There is nothing wrong with having a leader - it is a good thing, if the leading is done humbly and properly.
Who will direct this movement? How will it continue to coalesce and become an entity that can make a real difference? Can't have all chiefs and no indians or visa-versa.
It is exciting, as he says, but where is it going and how is it going to get there?
Just wondering what you all think - perhaps someone has better insight than I do.
Thanks...