Ron Paul's Last Stand - campaign post-mortem

In reference to that campaign email sent in May saying they wouldn't compete in anymore primaries:

In an October 2012 interview, Paul explained to me that while he knew it would discourage many of his grassroots fans, he just felt obliged to be honest with supporters about his chances. “It was my preference to do it…because I felt like if I didn’t do it, it was more deception. You have your very hard workers who are realistic and know what to expect,” he said. “And others have the expectation that tomorrow everyone in the world will know I’m going to be president of the United States. I thought it was time to be more honest and upfront rather than leading people astray.”
 
Then, in mid-May, Ron Paul issued a press release saying he wouldn’t be competing actively in California and Texas, using past-tense language such as congratulating his supporters for having “fought hard.” The media’s understandable conclusion: Paul had dropped out.

Except he hadn’t. The next day political director Jesse Benton scrambled to reframe the announcement, explaining that while the campaign was abandoning efforts to rack up primary votes in the big, expensive states, the effort to win delegates at state conventions would continue. Benton stressed the campaign’s desire to maintain a good relationship with the GOP, explaining that he wanted “respect and decorum” rather than more convention scrums.

The announcement hit Paul’s volunteer army hard. For some, it was evidence that the professional higher-ups surrounding the candidate—especially Benton, the grassroots’ bête noire—had lost intentionally. Theories ranged from the mundane (perhaps Paul was angling for a speaking slot at the convention) to the practical (the campaign was smoothing the path for the blander, more mainstream Rand Paul in 2016) to the paranoid (operatives were trying to kneecap the liberty movement entirely). This was a conspiracy theory I heard not only from anonymous firebrands at websites such as Ron Paul Forums, but from Oklahoma alternate delegate Porter Davis at the RNC. “For such a bunch of smart guys, they must have thrown the game to squander so many resources for such a pitiful result,” Davis said.

Activists noted that the announcement came directly after a weekend of particularly chaotic GOP state conventions. Paul fans had clashed with Romney folk in Arizona, and in Oklahoma, the Paulites split to run their own rump convention.

In an October 2012 interview, Paul explained to me that while he knew it would discourage many of his grassroots fans, he just felt obliged to be honest with supporters about his chances. “It was my preference to do it…because I felt like if I didn’t do it, it was more deception. You have your very hard workers who are realistic and know what to expect,” he said. “And others have the expectation that tomorrow everyone in the world will know I’m going to be president of the United States. I thought it was time to be more honest and upfront rather than leading people astray.”

I won't hold my breath for the mea culpa's from the Jesse Benton is the devil people.
 
Then, in mid-May, Ron Paul issued a press release saying he wouldn’t be competing actively in California and Texas, using past-tense language such as congratulating his supporters for having “fought hard.” The media’s understandable conclusion: Paul had dropped out.

Except he hadn’t. The next day political director Jesse Benton scrambled to reframe the announcement, explaining that while the campaign was abandoning efforts to rack up primary votes in the big, expensive states, the effort to win delegates at state conventions would continue.

this discussion was had at the time, I don't see anything new here.
 
seems like an accurate accounting.
wish he'd put more detail in the violence used against the state delegates in various states... but the idea is conveyed in general... so, its better than nothing.
 
I mean. I don't understand some of the dramatics to all this?

He get 50% under 30 years old in Iowa so his support has been growing from year to year disproportionately

2007= about 10000 votes
2011= about 27000 votes

He needs somewhere between 30-45K to win Iowa depending on the year.

So basically it's just party building. Take over more GOP states that are key. Keep building your base, and hope it's enough.

Hard to do in a short period of time.
 
I mean. I don't understand some of the dramatics to all this?

He get 50% under 30 years old in Iowa so his support has been growing from year to year disproportionately

2007= about 10000 votes
2011= about 27000 votes

He needs somewhere between 30-45K to win Iowa depending on the year.

So basically it's just party building. Take over more GOP states that are key. Keep building your base, and hope it's enough.

Hard to do in a short period of time.

i've been a political activist since 1996.
Our growth is tremendous. Ron started something.
I remember when he first announced... i got so excited.
I started searching the internet for news about him. that is how i eventually found this forum the first week it started)
I was Vice Chair of the LALP at the time, a registered libertarian who had already ran for major political offices twice. I, along with my friends in the LP, were ready to assist Ron with a political machine we had already built.
This is part of the story you don't get...
 
In an October 2012 interview, Paul explained to me that while he knew it would discourage many of his grassroots fans, he just felt obliged to be honest with supporters about his chances. “It was my preference to do it…because I felt like if I didn’t do it, it was more deception. You have your very hard workers who are realistic and know what to expect,” he said. “And others have the expectation that tomorrow everyone in the world will know I’m going to be president of the United States. I thought it was time to be more honest and upfront rather than leading people astray.”
SailingAway should read this quote every morning before beginning the day.
 
SailingAway should read this quote every morning before beginning the day.
SRSLY?

Because he was saying he wouldn't expect to win, not that he had given up. Note the part about still fighting for delegates. My posts at the time said that as well. You just think that secondary goals beyond the nomination were worthless, when he said from the beginning he was fighting for both, and many of us considered the hearts and minds opportunity of Ron Paul speaking at Rnc nominated from the floor alone to be worth donating to -- which is why we continued to do so.
 
Back
Top