Ron Paul's Conflicted View Of War

sailingaway

Member
Joined
Mar 7, 2010
Messages
72,103
Twitter was all a twitter when Ron Paul tweeted about former SEAL and sniper Chris Kyle's death saying, "Chris Kyle's death seems to confirm that 'he who lives by the sword dies by the sword.' Treating PTSD at a firing range doesn't make sense."

First, I must agree that treating a former soldier suffering with PTSD at a firing range doesn't make sense! That doesn't make anyone "anti-gun". It's just common sense.

That being said, if Mr. Paul were anyone else I doubt such a fuss would have been made but rather dismissed except for the rabid few. He then went to Facebook to clarify what he meant and didn't do well there either with this, "Unconstitutional and unnecessary wars have endless unintended consequences. A policy of non-violence, as Christ preached, would have prevented this and similar tragedies."

Our current President is doing his best to promote a non-violent war policy. Were it realistic I'd be thrilled. But it isn't. In order to have peace no one must to be willing to wage war. You see how well that's working as war, as we speak, is overflowing from the Middle East into North Africa and beyond. Regardless of what Christ, Gandhi or Martin Luther King, Jr. preached, non-violence does not seem to be in the human DNA.

I do understand, however, where Mr. Paul is coming from. Violence begets violence. It does. Just look at the headlines. I've listened to some veterans saying he is insulting every man and woman who wears the uniform. I think not. He's decrying war and it's never ending effects.

He is a veteran, he knows about war and he hates it. I dare say every one of those men and women in uniform also hate it. As should we all. Not only for what it does to our own people, but also the innocents who are caught up in it through no fault of their own other than being in the wrong place at the wrong time.

more at link: http://bestoftheblogs.com/Home/61410
 
Our current President is doing his best to promote a non-violent war policy. Were it realistic I'd be thrilled. But it isn't. In order to have peace no one must to be willing to wage war. You see how well that's working as war, as we speak, is overflowing from the Middle East into North Africa and beyond. Regardless of what Christ, Gandhi or Martin Luther King, Jr. preached, non-violence does not seem to be in the human DNA.
That about makes me want to puke. Our current president is the one that spread it throughout north africa with the libyan intervention.
 
I'll take the leftist sympathy. At least she understands Ron's motives unlike conservatives that say he hates America.
 
Our current President is doing his best to promote a non-violent war policy. Were it realistic I'd be thrilled. But it isn't. In order to have peace no one must to be willing to wage war. You see how well that's working as war, as we speak, is overflowing from the Middle East into North Africa and beyond. Regardless of what Christ, Gandhi or Martin Luther King, Jr. preached, non-violence does not seem to be in the human DNA.

I don't know whether to laugh or cry.
 
I don't know whether to laugh or cry.

the Obama regime believes it is doing just that, cutting down on casualties by employing drones, thus avoiding putting troops on the ground and possibly causing more loss of life in hand to hand guerrilla style combat
 
Back
Top