Ron Pauls across America: Candidates that need our support.

A quick and dirty copy edit...

I haven't really addressed form or content or style or a number of other things. Well, not very much. :) This is just a quick run through to get a few minor details straightened out. Most of my suggestions are pretty nit-picky stuff (I was an English major; I can't help myself.) and some may have been caused by my non-standard word processor not playing well with the forum. Further, many of my suggestions aren't strictly for grammatical correctness so much as for clarity.
If you'll tell us how this whole thing works, maybe some of us can be of more help. For instance, is this supposed to be a list of facts that the newspaper or other outlet will then work into a story or is it likely to be released as-is? Different approach for each.
Once you've given a bit more context as to how this will be used, I'd be happy to take another (more brutal) pass at it and address some of those other concerns, if that's what you really want. Of course, I know little about journalism, so my input on that front may be of limited value.
-------------

Brent Sanders of Alexandria has formally announced his candidacy for 5th District Congressional Representative. Sanders graduated high school from Holy Savior Menard High School [where?] and received a Bachelor’s Degree in Sociology from Louisiana College.

He said he will work to reduce the size of the federal government by voting against pork barrel projects and working to reform or shut down programs which [that?] do not work. He says [tense switch from previous “said”] he is not willing to make promises just to receive a vote.
"I want to go to Washington to work for the people of the 5th Congressional District [;] and [strike “and”] working to cut pork barrel projects will help us all," Sanders said.
Another issue Sanders said is important is Social Security. Sanders said “Our congress should have fixed the system years ago when it was first pointed out that there was a problem [. Instead they've passed...] and not pass the problem on to future generations.”

Sanders said he would work to initially shore up the system so it can meet the growing demand the baby-boomers will be placing on the system and so the federal government can meet its obligations to all citizens. He added, “In the long term, I would like to see the system move toward privatization so the public can invest there [their] hard earned dollar [dollars. But] but first we have to meet our obligations.”
When questioned about the War in Iraq [,] Sanders said, “While the main population now opposes the war, people shouldn’t forget the Democratic and Republican Leaders [small “l” leaders] in Washington almost all voted unanimously [unanimously means all, not “almost all”] to go to war. " [remove space between “ and .] Sanders added [add “,” or “that”] although he would like to see an immediate withdrawal of troops [,] he realizes this would [will?] be difficult.

Sanders would like to see our sons and daughters out of harms [harm's] way. He said, “Our goal was to remove Saddam Hussein, his corrupt leadership, and eliminate any weapons of mass destruction [Hussein and his corrupt leadership and to eliminate... This is not a list of like things.]. While no weapons of mass destruction were found, our mission has essentially been accomplished.” [need two spaces here] He added, “ Our [remove space between “ and Our] country should not engage in nation building and that is exactly what we are doing in Iraq. We have stabilized the new Iraqi Government [do you want to capitalize “Government” here?] as best we can and now it is time to let the Iraqi people determine the outcome of [eliminate “the outcome of”] their future.”
On gas and oil [,] Sanders said it is past time for our government to stop subsidies to [this is nit-picky, but you should use a verb form here somehow; i.e., “stop subsidizing” or “stop granting subsidies to”] the oil companies. He said he can see no reason why the federal government should continue to subsidize these oil companies while they continue to net [reap?] major profits at the cost of [at cost to] the consumer.

Sanders said by removing oil subsidies it [awkward; consider “said that removing oil subsidies would create”] would create a fairer market [marketplace = one word?] place in which alternative energy [alternative energy solutions?] could freely develop as the market demands.

Sanders feels illegal immigration and the burden it places on our country is extreme. [consider “Sanders feels that the burden placed on this country by illegal immigration is extreme.”] He said he would like to see existing laws enforced. He feels [that] immigration should be allowed but [that] illegal immigration should be prevented.
He pointed out immigrants have always had a role to play in our country. While he opposes using military to patrol our borders with Mexico for illegal immigrants [,] he is not opposed to increasing the size and training of our Border Patrol.

In regard to tax dollars and illegal immigrants [,] Sanders said, “Our school systems should not be required to educate people who are here illegally. Our hospitals should not be required to provide services, other than emergencies [emergency care?], to illegal immigrants at the expense of [consider “to”] tax payers. This charity to illegals needs to stop now before it completely drains our resources [.]”
 
Got it.

It will sent as a press release for the announcement of my campaign, while also stating a few important positions.
It will most likely end up on my website too.
Is that the kind of context you were looking for?

Yup, exactly. So, this is to be treated as a finished whole, not as informational material for the journalists to cherry pick. Got it. Whole different approach. Sorry for the copy editing. Good with words; don't know much about journalism. :cool:
The original draft, while an excellent start, comes off a bit "bullet point-ish." The reworks done by the other posters certainly help with the flow and direction of the piece.
 
Yup, exactly. So, this is to be treated as a finished whole, not as informational material for the journalists to cherry pick. Got it. Whole different approach. Sorry for the copy editing. Good with words; don't know much about journalism. :cool:
The original draft, while an excellent start, comes off a bit "bullet point-ish." The reworks done by the other posters certainly help with the flow and direction of the piece.

If you have something else to propose i will take a look at it, unless you think its at a good point already.
 
Looks Good.

If you have something else to propose i will take a look at it, unless you think its at a good point already.

Wouldn't think I could add much to the fine work done already. Happy to help where I can, but it looks like the others fleshed out your already good draft quite well. You should be off to a running start to your campaign. Good luck.
 
Thanks beerista, there are still many things to do until election time. with your help, this run will be easier on me.
 
Larry Kilgore
Seeking: US Senate Texas
Running agaisnt: either Cornyn, John or Hutchison, Kay Bailey
website:http://www.larrykilgore.com/index.html

no offense to who suggested him, but is this guy serious?

First the home page has a picture of a mass grave. I was about to dismiss him when I saw that and read the paragraph above it about abortion and nazis. But I'm willing to give it a little bit of a chance. So I clicked issues. And its mostly about what the punishment for a few crimes should be. and:

Eliminate all funding for Texas prisions (how is the state going to buy weapons and hire people to do all the floggings as proposed in the issues?)

"Texas should SECEDE because the US has sealed it doom"

It references the site texassecession.com, which I went to expecting something like the free state project. But It just calls for forming Texas into a "christian nation".

Want to move to the Lone Star State? Well first you have to "Provide proof that you have been a blessing to the community."

Oh and don't even think about "visiting Texas without approval" because your going to get a "minimum of five lashes, $3,000 fine & deportation. If the fine is not paid immediately, involuntary servitude will be required."

I have yet to see a single position that is even close to the "Paul platform".

Ok I'm a native Texan and proud of it. Also proud of the fact that it was briefly the Republic of Texas (Thats why the TX flag can be flown the same height as the US flag).

If this is whats best for Texas count me out.
 
Last edited:
Wasnt sure either but he spoke at the KC rally so I thought if nothing else well contact him and see where he stands.
 
Back
Top