Check out the article and idiotic statements in the comments section from Red State:
This year, Ron Paul breaks Mitt Romney’s winning streak. Clearly Romney realized he was not getting a good return on his investment of organizing voters to vote — a regular phenomenon among potential candidates.
2,395 CPAC registrants voted in the CPAC poll. It’s the largest number of votes in CPAC straw polling history, but but less than 25% of the total turnout at CPAC.
48% of the votes cast were from students. 32% were from paying non-student individuals.
31% voted for Ron Paul. The crowd booed when it was announced.
22% voted for Mitt Romney.
7% voted for Sarah Palin.
6% for Tim Pawlenty
5% for Mike Pence
4% for Mike Huckabee and Newt Gingrich
2% for the actual 2012 GOP nominee, Mitch Daniels.
We can thank Ron Paul for showing just how worthless straw polls are.
COMMENTS:
Doc Holliday Saturday, February 20th at 6:00PM EST
it is a shame we don’t have a libertarian-conservative candidate who doesn’t have a screw loose.
Viet71 Saturday, February 20th at 6:05PM EST
there is no perfect candidate.
I’ll settle for one who is principled, honest, and dedicated to the Constitution.
Doc Holliday Saturday, February 20th at 6:09PM EST (link)
who is dedicated to America. We can no more retreat from the world and forfeit American Power, than we can give up the War on Terror. If we followed Paul’s idea to pretend we are say, Latvia, the world would be much more dangerous and our Constitution would only be paper.
jeffreywturner Saturday, February 20th at 6:11PM EST
Now that the term “retarded” has been added to the official list of words we are not allowed to say (thanks to Sarah), are we no longer allowed to refer to Ron Paul’s disciples as “Paul-tards”, or is that still OK?
If we can call them that anymore, does anyone care to suggest a new name?
I am thinking maybe “Paulunatics” or something along those lines.
http://www.redstate.com/erick/2010/...ely-get-the-eventual-gop-nomination/#comments