Ron Paul: "We know none of the four will be elected." WTF?

JosephTheLibertarian said:
You can blame yourself and your fellow protectionist Baldwin supporters for that. You guys are the reason I'm more anti-Baldwin than I am anti-Mccain and Obama
Click to expand...

That says WAY MORE about you, than it does those who are voting for Baldwin. In fact, it speaks VOLUMES.
 
LibertyEagle said:
You seem to be having difficulty understanding that we elect a presidential candidate; not his supporters.
Click to expand...

Supporters can provide some indications.... if I can't stand a candidates supporters, then how can I support te guy? I would HAVE to assume that I'd be unable to stand the candidate as well. but that's ok. It's all for nothing, old lady. Nthing is going to change in November. Mark my words!!
 
JosephTheLibertarian said:
Supporters can provide some indications.... if I can't stand a candidates supporters, then how can I support te guy? I would HAVE to assume that I'd be unable to stand the candidate as well. but that's ok. It's all for nothing, old lady. Nthing is going to change in November. Mark my words!!
Click to expand...


Racists and prostitutes supported Ron Paul.
 
It's called being realistic and honest.

Ron Paul has gone about as far as the system can allow, now is the time to do other things, but voting is still a good message to send.
 
He's right. Be realistic. It's not because the candidates aren't good enough, it's because the system is so biased against them. A third party presidential candidate is NOT getting elected in 2008.
 
Kludge said:
Oh boy, the document which led to the most tyrannical and centralized government since the country seceded from G.B.
Click to expand...

Bullshit. What led to the situation we are in, is the fact that for way too long, Americans sat on their fat butts and didn't keep abreast of the issues and hold their representatives accountable. WE CREATED THIS. Our Founding Fathers gave us a pretty darn good system of government and they also admonished us to stay vigilant.

We didn't.

Put the blame where it belongs.
 
Truth Warrior said:
Nope, not a chance in hell. Ron's correct. ;) 3rd parties are completely IRRELEVANT.
Click to expand...

all parties are irrelevant. It's really just something we do for fun. We put on a big show every couple years and pretend it's all great and serious. Then, we wake up later, and it still sucks, cuz nothing really changes. :eek: (R.I.P, George Carlin :D )
 
JosephTheLibertarian said:
Supporters can provide some indications.... if I can't stand a candidates supporters, then how can I support te guy? I would HAVE to assume that I'd be unable to stand the candidate as well. but that's ok. It's all for nothing, old lady. Nthing is going to change in November. Mark my words!!
Click to expand...

Hhhmmm... There are more than a few Ron Paul supporters that I can't stand, but that has nothing to do with my support for Ron Paul.
 
LibertyEagle said:
Bullshit. What led to the situation we are in, is the fact that for way too long, Americans sat on their fat butts and didn't keep abreast of the issues and hold their representatives accountable. WE CREATED THIS. Our Founding Fathers gave us a pretty darn good system of government and they also admonished us to stay vigilant.

We didn't.

Put the blame where it belongs.
Click to expand...

Jefferson says every Generation needs a Revolution.

Gotta water the tree of liberty.

We haven't.
 
"Preserve the Union" would have been laughed at if the Constitution didn't strip states of their sovereignty.
 
I don't think that any of the third party options have a chance of winning, but that doesn't mean I am going to cast my vote for either of the major party candidates. I'm willing to fight for the third party candidates (as soon as my roomate gets off his ass ;)) see sig
 
dannno said:
I don't think that any of the third party options have a chance of winning, but that doesn't mean I am going to cast my vote for either of the major party candidates. I'm willing to fight for the third party candidates (as soon as my roomate gets off his ass ;)) see sig
Click to expand...

Nice Danno....how are your kitties???
 
Well...here's the facts. The only viable 3rd party candidate who would have made any headway is Bob barr and the LP. Bob Barr was polling 6% nationally...and could have risen to 15% and gotten in the debates had RON PAUL ENDORSED HIM EARLY ON. Well, Ron Paul didn't do it , so that tells me he didn't give a rosey rats rear whether a third party got up the political ladder or not. My take is that his advisors told him to support all four 3rd party people in order to increase their membership in the Campaign for Liberty. When they pissed off Barr by putting it out in the press (falsely) that Barr had dropped out....Verny got angry and cancelled. When Verny cancelled 40 minutes before the conference (which it seems Ron Paul knew about) RP's advisors decided to seek revenge and told Ron Paul to endorse Baldwin. You COULD have had a viable third party IF Barr was endorsed...but Ron Paul's advisors didn't want to make anyone mad enough to quit the Campaign for Liberty....so they told him to stand in the middle. It didn't work. Now ...you can forget ANY third party making any sort of impact. What a mess. Tones (I am pragmatic)
 
tonesforjonesbones said:
Well...here's the facts. The only viable 3rd party candidate who would have made any headway is Bob barr and the LP. Bob Barr was polling 6% nationally...and could have risen to 15% and gotten in the debates had RON PAUL ENDORSED HIM EARLY ON. Well, Ron Paul didn't do it , so that tells me he didn't give a rosey rats rear whether a third party got up the political ladder or not. My take is that his advisors told him to support all four 3rd party people in order to increase their membership in the Campaign for Liberty. When they pissed off Barr by putting it out in the press (falsely) that Barr had dropped out....Verny got angry and cancelled. When Verny cancelled 40 minutes before the conference (which it seems Ron Paul knew about) RP's advisors decided to seek revenge and told Ron Paul to endorse Baldwin. You COULD have had a viable third party IF Barr was endorsed...but Ron Paul's advisors didn't want to make anyone mad enough to quit the Campaign for Liberty....so they told him to stand in the middle. It didn't work. Now ...you can forget ANY third party making any sort of impact. What a mess. Tones (I am pragmatic)
Click to expand...

Are you just like making this up as you go along?

Ron Paul might have endorsed someone earlier; however, he had the problem of having two people who had shown support for him.
 
Ron Paul should have endorsed the one who had the best chance to make a dent in MCCAIN...damn! That was BOB BARR. Now NO difference will be made whatsoever. Incredable. Tones
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

PAF
The IRS Isn’t Going Away, and This is How We Know
2
Replies
38
Views
279
TheTexan
TheTexan
PAF
The Menace of Tariffs
2
Replies
32
Views
7K
Madison320
M
PAF
Here We Go Again: US Department of Health and Human Services Funds and Fast-tracks Experimental Bird Flu Shots
Replies
3
Views
52
acptulsa
acptulsa
Brian4Liberty
Why We’ll Never Know What Really Happened in Butler, PA
Replies
16
Views
2K
acptulsa
acptulsa
PAF
Refugee. Dissident. Enemy of the State. Would ICE Have Crucified Jesus?
Replies
6
Views
37
familydog
F
Back
Top