Ron Paul Warns don't vote for Ted Cruz

Many claim to be one thing and end up entirely different once they have achieved their objective. I believe Cruz cut the final strand when he couldn't be bothered to show up and vote "Aye" on an Audit the Fed bill he co-sponsored.

I bet he was in the dog house with his wife and Goldman Sachs when he co-sponsored that bill. There was no way in hell he could show up for the vote, lol.
 
And it comes up lacking WRT Liberty. You believe in expanded torture? Summary execution across all states for the killing of an L.E.O. regardless of state law? Increasing the use of eminent domain? Changing libel laws so that critics of politicians can be sued? Mandates/subsidies for ethanol (corn). Increasing the national debt?

Nope, but I think it's more important to stop the end of the United States as a nation state and into a "homeland" for a global community. None of what you write above matters if we have one world government. You have to start somewhere.
 
That's because you are very ignorant of the system.

I prefer to live in reality. A reality where I actually know how to interpret financial contributions. A reality where evidence actually matters.
 
Nope, but I think it's more important to stop the end of the United States as a nation state and into a "homeland" for a global community. None of what you write above matters if we have one world government. You have to start somewhere.

You don't start by electing an authoritarian. You think Obama's executive orders are blatant disregard for his appointed position? Wait until you see what a Trump presidency would bring. His executive orders would rival the tax code in pages and ink.
 
I prefer to live in reality. A reality where I actually know how to interpret financial contributions. A reality where evidence actually matters.

A 'reality' crafted for you by the MSM (tm)

You're a real free thinker :rolleyes:

I'm glad you support liberty to some extent, but you have to realize that the reason our country is so screwed is precisely because of the way people like you think.
 
I don't think we have the same problem here of people supporting Cruz that we do with Trump, which honestly seems kind of backwards to me.

But it's relevant that when Ron said this it was when Cruz was running against Rand. At this point in time, Cruz is the candidate whose views are closer to Ron's than anyone else's, even if he is still probably unacceptable to Ron and many here.
 
Last edited:
I prefer to live in reality. A reality where I actually know how to interpret financial contributions. A reality where evidence actually matters.

So when you hear the words Goldman Sachs, you don't start foaming at the mouth and your brain continues to function?

Perhaps you didn't know his wife works at the power center of the world in Houston(?) as a broker, I mean Vice President of Goldman Sachs sharing that title with literally everyone who is a broker. Don't you know how political contributions work? His wife asks high earning people in the office and elsewhere throughout the company to contribute and the 60k in contributions entitles them to Ted Cruz's soul. Never mind that Ted Cruz has raised $70 million just for this Presidential race. GOLDMAN SACHS. EVIL. FEDERAL RESERVE. GOLDMAN SACHS. Hopefully that cleared things up.
 
I prefer to live in reality. A reality where I actually know how to interpret financial contributions. A reality where evidence actually matters.

For me, it was the fact that Ted so strongly promoted the TPP/TPA and didn't give a rat's patootie that it ceded more of our national sovereignty to an international ruling body, much less cause what industry we have left to move out of the country. That caused me to look more into 'ol Ted. What I found was a long history of he and his wife working for the Bush family and his wife sitting on the Council on Foreign Relations Task Force about throwing the U.S. into a North American Union.

That's more than enough for me to know Ted is a traitor.

Those are just the highlights. I recommend you do the research yourself.
 
Cruz is a dubious politician and a snake. You can never tell is he working for Goldman Sachs or some other branch of neocons.

When Trump attacked Bush's dumb Iraq war legacy, this neocons puppy tried to defend it. Fail.
 
justin amash endorsed ted cruz. the only libertarian endorsement that i know for any politician still left. i'm voting cruz
 
For me, it was the fact that Ted so strongly promoted the TPP/TPA and didn't give a rat's patootie that it ceded more of our national sovereignty to an international ruling body, much less cause what industry we have left to move out of the country. That caused me to look more into 'ol Ted. What I found was a long history of he and his wife working for the Bush family and his wife sitting on the Council on Foreign Relations Task Force about throwing the U.S. into a North American Union.

That's more than enough for me to know Ted is a traitor.

Those are just the highlights. I recommend you do the research yourself.

I wasn't happy with Cruz's support of the TPA. Still, I'm convinced he was doing so in the spirit of free trade.

Ted Cruz's wife had a dissenting opinion on the NAU. She is a nice woman and I find nothing nefarious about her.
 
So when you hear the words Goldman Sachs, you don't start foaming at the mouth and your brain continues to function?

Perhaps you didn't know his wife works at the power center of the world in Houston(?) as a broker, I mean Vice President of Goldman Sachs sharing that title with literally everyone who is a broker. Don't you know how political contributions work? His wife asks high earning people in the office and elsewhere throughout the company to contribute and the 60k in contributions entitles them to Ted Cruz's soul. Never mind that Ted Cruz has raised $70 million just for this Presidential race. GOLDMAN SACHS. EVIL. FEDERAL RESERVE. GOLDMAN SACHS. Hopefully that cleared things up.

Can't rep you right now but this is excellent.
 
A 'reality' crafted for you by the MSM (tm)

You're a real free thinker :rolleyes:

I'm glad you support liberty to some extent, but you have to realize that the reason our country is so screwed is precisely because of the way people like you think.

Aren't you one of those people who thinks bankers killed JFK?
 
What about this guy?

http://www.chertoffgroup.com/bios/chad-sweet.php

Once is a chance, twice is coincidence.

Look, people share circles.

I cannot find a reason why Goldman Sachs or the CFR (not a monolithic group) would want Ted Cruz as President.

I used to buy into this stuff, but I can't do it anymore. Too many false predictions. What is supposed to go down doesn't go down. For me, the NWO conspiracy is the boy who cried wolf.

The more I study campaigns, the more I realize that they are almost totally driven by candidate ambition. Sure, special interest groups try to curry favor and they do, but that really only occurs with the likes of the Bushes and Clintons. I do not believe that people are "selected" to run for President.
 
Ron says Cruz is owned by Goldman Sachs, has more in common with Hillary than anyone else.


https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...l-warns-republicans-not-to-vote-for-ted-cruz/

You are misquoting Dr. Paul. Here's what he said.

"He and Hillary have more in common than we have with Trump or anyone else."

That is not the same as saying Cruz has more in common with Hillary than anyone else.

That said, I have three questions for Dr. Ron Paul.

1) Rand Paul took money from Bilderberg member Peter Thiel. Before taking that money Rand spoke on video about how concerned he was about the secretive Bilderberg group. After taking that money Rand purposefully avoided being interviewed again on the subject of Bilderberg by the same WeAreChange reporters that interviewed him the first time. Does that mean Rand is owned by Bilderberg?

2) If Cruz is so terrible, why did you endorse him for senate? What changed between that endorsement and now to make him Satan incarnate? Cause he didn't vote on EndTheFed? Well Rand didn't stand with Cruz on his Obamacare defund efforts. Is one vote going to be a litmus test for everything?

3) Considering what a disaster the Ken Buck endorsement (seriously that RINO is much MUCH worse than Ted Cruz ever could be), and the firestorm of anger from Rand endorsing Mitt Romney, and the fact that Rand's endorsement of Mitch McConnell probably hurt him with tea party voters, can you and Rand just stop endorsing anyone? Seriously. If TeCruz is so terrible, you helped create this authoritarian monster with an unworthy endorsement. How about this? Just rank every major candidate for an statewide or federal office with your "freedom" scale, put the number out there, and let it speak for itself. But adjust the damn scale. Kick out anyone in your organization that doesn't get freedom means more than fiscal conservatism. Ken Buck led the failed effort to stop decriminalization of marijuana. Sure that was after his kinda/sorta endorsement by the CFL. But the CFL questionnaire should have asked about drug legalization. It should have had enough foreign policy questions on it to keep a neocon/teocon from getting a top score as well.

Anyhow, the opinion of Ron Paul on this issue lacks political relevance. He is "scared" of Trump and concerned about Cruz. And his fractured liberty movement is now too small and too scattered to make a difference this election cycle. Besides, anyone with half a brain knew after Iowa that this was headed to a brokered convention anyway. Trump voters will only vote for him. Cruz supporters can't stand Trump but hate Rubio. Same going the other way. None of those three men will bow out and none of them can get more than 50% of the delegates without one of the other two dropping out. The GOP nominee will be picked in a smoke filled room. In the year of the anti-establishment candidate, the establishment will hand pick the candidate.
 
Ted Cruz wife is a member of the CFR.

And Donald Trump had a secret meeting with the head of the CFR. And Rand Paul took money from a Bilderberg billionaire and all of a sudden talking about the Bilderberg group was off limits.
 
Back
Top