Ron says Cruz is owned by Goldman Sachs, has more in common with Hillary than anyone else.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...l-warns-republicans-not-to-vote-for-ted-cruz/
You are misquoting Dr. Paul. Here's what he said.
"He and Hillary have more in common than we have with Trump or anyone else."
That is
not the same as saying Cruz has more in common with Hillary than anyone else.
That said, I have three questions for Dr. Ron Paul.
1) Rand Paul took money from Bilderberg member Peter Thiel. Before taking that money Rand spoke on video about how concerned he was about the secretive Bilderberg group. After taking that money Rand purposefully avoided being interviewed again on the subject of Bilderberg by the same WeAreChange reporters that interviewed him the first time. Does that mean Rand is owned by Bilderberg?
2) If Cruz is so terrible, why did you endorse him for senate? What changed between that endorsement and now to make him Satan incarnate? Cause he didn't vote on EndTheFed? Well Rand didn't stand with Cruz on his Obamacare defund efforts. Is one vote going to be a litmus test for everything?
3) Considering what a disaster the Ken Buck endorsement (seriously that RINO is much MUCH worse than Ted Cruz ever could be), and the firestorm of anger from Rand endorsing Mitt Romney, and the fact that Rand's endorsement of Mitch McConnell probably hurt him with tea party voters, can you and Rand just stop endorsing anyone? Seriously. If TeCruz is so terrible, you helped create this authoritarian monster with an unworthy endorsement. How about this? Just rank every major candidate for an statewide or federal office with your "freedom" scale, put the number out there, and let it speak for itself. But adjust the damn scale. Kick out anyone in your organization that doesn't get freedom means more than fiscal conservatism. Ken Buck led the failed effort to stop decriminalization of marijuana. Sure that was after his kinda/sorta endorsement by the CFL. But the CFL questionnaire should have asked about drug legalization. It should have had enough foreign policy questions on it to keep a neocon/teocon from getting a top score as well.
Anyhow, the opinion of Ron Paul on this issue lacks political relevance. He is "scared" of Trump and concerned about Cruz. And his fractured liberty movement is now too small and too scattered to make a difference this election cycle. Besides, anyone with half a brain knew after Iowa that this was headed to a brokered convention anyway. Trump voters will only vote for him. Cruz supporters can't stand Trump but hate Rubio. Same going the other way. None of those three men will bow out and none of them can get more than 50% of the delegates without one of the other two dropping out. The GOP nominee will be picked in a smoke filled room. In the year of the anti-establishment candidate, the establishment will hand pick the candidate.