Ron Paul Warns don't vote for Ted Cruz


"I'm toying with endorsing Cruz, but it's a pill that does not go down easily," said New Hampshire state Rep. Eric Eastman (R).
"It's a pill that goes down sideways.
Cruz and Trump sent their emissaries, as did Carly Fiorina. Each of them tried to relate their guy's positions, but none of them could really succeed.
The fact of the matter is the sense of principle and ethics that the Paulians embrace is not mirrored by any of the other candidates."


Neil Bush in the Cruz campaign now . . . how about Cruz / Neil! 2016
 
Yes, we keep getting told who NOT to vote for, with no recommendation on who we should vote for.

Alternatively what country to move to with all the cash we made hoarding gold for the last 8 years.
 
I recall the Pauls endorsed Cruz when he was running for senator in 2012.

Many claim to be one thing and end up entirely different once they have achieved their objective. I believe Cruz cut the final strand when he couldn't be bothered to show up and vote "Aye" on an Audit the Fed bill he co-sponsored.
 
Can we get some pointers as far as who to vote for?

Vote for who you think is best for what you believe in -- it's your vote.

im voting for Trump, not because I agree with everything Trump believes in - I believe in some of it, but mainly because I hate the establishment GOP and their control of everything for the past 30 years. They are out of control, and while Trump has Christie and Rudy backing him, that's because he is from thst area. Trump has some pretty good anti-establishment - anti- globalists on his campaign. He is one of the original 911 was an inside job types, he had thought about running on a 3rd party ticket in 1999 (that is huge to me - as nobody does that if they are establishment).

Its not really about Trump, it's about the millions of Americans that are sick and tired of what's been happening and coming out to vote to save their country.

i was totally anti-trump - look at my past posts, wether it's here or on the popular Liberty archive, but I really think Trump would be far better than Hillary or Cruz (Bush part 3), but mainly to end the monopoly of the two parties on who decides our President.

thats all I got
 
Sorry, I just can't take the "owned by Goldman Sachs" stuff seriously.
 
thats all I got

And it comes up lacking WRT Liberty. You believe in expanded torture? Summary execution across all states for the killing of an L.E.O. regardless of state law? Increasing the use of eminent domain? Changing libel laws so that critics of politicians can be sued? Mandates/subsidies for ethanol (corn). Increasing the national debt?
 
And it comes up lacking WRT Liberty. You believe in expanded torture? Summary execution across all states for the killing of an L.E.O. regardless of state law? Increasing the use of eminent domain? Changing libel laws so that critics of politicians can be sued? Mandates/subsidies for ethanol (corn). Increasing the national debt?

I want Congress & Trump to push back against eachother.

With Rubio you get amnesty for 12 million Democrats and 12 new wars.

Congress, think tanks like Cato, Koch, Heritage & Reason; and Media types will help elect people to congress who oppose Trump's libel laws.

[h=3]Flashback: Raul Labrador helps illegal aliens get amnesty ...[/h]www.mofopolitics.com/.../flashback-raul-labrador-helps-illegal-immigra...


Mar 11, 2014 - Recently, Raul Labrador pledged to make legalizing 40 million of the most liberal, most anti-gun, least educated that South America has to offer ...
 
I want Congress & Trump to push back against eachother.

With Rubio you get amnesty for 12 million Democrats and 12 new wars.

Congress, think tanks like Cato, Koch, Heritage & Reason; and Media types will help elect people to congress who oppose Trump's libel laws.

[h=3]Flashback: Raul Labrador helps illegal aliens get amnesty ...[/h]www.mofopolitics.com/.../flashback-raul-labrador-helps-illegal-immigra...


Mar 11, 2014 - Recently, Raul Labrador pledged to make legalizing 40 million of the most liberal, most anti-gun, least educated that South America has to offer ...

Rubio sucks too. You're comparing rotten apples to rotten apples.

Trump would just require an expensive federal expenditure to hunt them down, deport them and then "expedite" the "good ones" back in. How does that sound?
 
Rubio sucks too. You're comparing rotten apples to rotten apples.

Trump would just require an expensive federal expenditure to hunt them down, deport them and then "expedite" the "good ones" back in. How does that sound?

Sounds like Congress will only fund rounding up 100,000 gang members. The other stuff won't happen.

Congress won't fund a billion to bring illegals back in.

This is how Trump beat Rand. Rand promised the 12 million get to stay & they started pouring across the border when Obama did it via executive order.

. Trump will deport the most violent and most lazy of the 1 or 2 million.

If it is so expensive how is open borders guy Paul Ryan going to allow it to be funded?
 
Back
Top