Ron Paul Tops CNET's Political SCORECARD! SCORE!

I really love that man. Click on their percentages. Note that Paul actually voted on CNET's choice issues while everybody else has n/a or not voting.
 
CNET's comments:

"A less obvious winner was Texas Rep. Ron Paul, the former Republican presidential candidate who attracted an enthusiastic online following because of his opposition to the Iraq war, as well as his views on civil liberties and taxation.

Paul sits on no relevant committees. He represents a rural district along the Gulf Coast that's home to few Web 2.0 start-ups but to plenty of cattle ranchers and petrochemical companies. But he's had a long interest in privacy and Internet regulation; his official Web site lists his speeches on financial privacy, national ID cards, Social Security number misuse, and medical privacy spanning more than a decade.

The obstetrician-turned-presidential-contender also topped our 2006 House scorecard. "I believe strongly in protecting the Internet," Paul told us at the time. "My colleagues aren't quite as interested in the subject. That, to me, is disappointing."
 
We should digg/reddit this. I wonder though, what will happen to most of those users (digg/reddit ones) once Obama (their chosen one) becomes president and doesn't live up to his promises. I'm betting most will just accept it and make excuses for him, like current die-hard Bush supporters. Justin Raimondo wrote a good article about the messiah Obama: http://www.antiwar.com/justin/?articleid=13698
 
A less obvious winner was Texas Rep. Ron Paul, the former Republican presidential candidate who attracted an enthusiastic online following because of his opposition to the Iraq war, as well as his views on civil liberties and taxation.

Paul sits on no relevant committees. He represents a rural district along the Gulf Coast that's home to few Web 2.0 start-ups but to plenty of cattle ranchers and petrochemical companies. But he's had a long interest in privacy and Internet regulation; his official Web site lists his speeches on financial privacy, national ID cards, Social Security number misuse, and medical privacy spanning more than a decade.

The obstetrician-turned-presidential-contender also topped our 2006 House scorecard. "I believe strongly in protecting the Internet," Paul told us at the time. "My colleagues aren't quite as interested in the subject. That, to me, is disappointing."

^^
 
We should digg/reddit this. I wonder though, what will happen to most of those users (digg/reddit ones) once Obama (their chosen one) becomes president and doesn't live up to his promises. I'm betting most will just accept it and make excuses for him, like current die-hard Bush supporters. Justin Raimondo wrote a good article about the messiah Obama: http://www.antiwar.com/justin/?articleid=13698


That's exactly what I've been thinking. How much will it take before they start defecting? Many hung onto Bush until the bitter end despite all reason.
 
5. For the Real ID Act
Vote: Yes

What???

Edit: Nevermind, it seems as if they are using the checkmark to indicate that a candidate voted on the correct side of the issue, not in favor of the legislation. This is pretty confusing with green checks next to things such as "5. For the Real ID Act," "9. To disclose federal data mining to Congress," "11. To prohibit Internet gambling," etc.

Explanation here: http://news.cnet.com/2009-1040-6247303.html?tag=topnav
 
Last edited:
The obstetrician-turned-presidential-contender also topped our 2006 House scorecard. "I believe strongly in protecting the Internet," Paul told us at the time. "My colleagues aren't quite as interested in the subject. That, to me, is disappointing."

Neat that they gave him the highest score in the House way back in 2006.
 
Back
Top