Ron Paul slams Boston police. Has he gone too far?

Just keep posting pics/videos of the terror squads throughout Boston metro.


Yeah, like 50+ people died and 100s wounded in one month in south Chicago... NOTHING compared to this organized authoritarian media blitz of Boston. All these media Statist fucks love their amour vehicles rolling through neighborhoods, storm troopers pointing guns at civilians/children, and breaking into everyone's homes. Then they create jingoism of symbols of propaganda for the simple minded masses at all these sporting events.

BTW, the SPLC has to be one of the worse hate groups of the past century. As usual, pushing their cultural Marxism and Communistic propaganda.

Americans need to be awakening to what Media, Marxists, and .Gov are fooling the people with their lies and force.
 
Good ol' Morris Dees and his brethren know what's good for you...

Morris sleaze (tried to have sex with his step-daughter) and mark Potok / potluck are part of southern perversion law center.

I wonder what grave they dug up and reanimated potluck from, ya know? The guy just doesn't look right. And when he talks on these shows, there is only opinion, no facts. No focus on poverty, and a total perversion of the Constitution. The law of the land..



As far as rp's comments, he should have mentioned that the fascist in chief should be impeached. He didn't go far enough.
 
Last edited:
There is and should be nothing that is off limits in criticizing any facet of any government operation.
 
2agkjo8.jpg
 
Seriously, quoting this little turd?


Furthermore, Paul’s own new organization, the Ron Paul Institute for Peace and Prosperity, has an advisory board that contains a “bevy of conspiracy theorists, cranks, and apologists for some of the worst regimes on the planet,” according to Daily Beast writer James Kirchik.


CSMonitor has lost it.
 
Ron Paul did not go far enough
http://voxday.blogspot.com/2013/05/ron-paul-did-not-go-far-enough.html
Ron Paul is absolutely right to criticize the horrific abuse of American civil liberties in the pursuit of men who killed fewer people than died sitting on toilets the day of the Boston Marathon:
[...]
Paul's criticism is strong, but it could be stronger. The fact is that President Obama should be ordering a federal investigation of the violations of the Constitution by the city and state police, as well as any federal agencies involved. It is depressing to think that we might have had a President Paul responding to this unprecedented attack on the American people by the police forces of the State if only the Republican Party had not insisted that Mitt Romney was "electable".

Moreover, as Karl Denninger points out, not only were the Boston police not heroic, they were both incompetent and dishonest about their incompetency:
The cops unconstitutionally locked down a 20-block area. This was not a case of "hot pursuit" where a valid exception exists to the 4th Amendment -- they had no idea where the bad guy was, other than the general area where they saw him last. That does not give license for what was done in Watertown.

But then to add to that they were both incompetent in that they didn't search a street inside the perimeter, they lied about the fact that the boat was inside the perimeter and in addition the cops fired without having acquired a target and without having taken fire themselves when they shot up the boat.

The defendant had no weapon; he clearly did not shoot at the cops first.

In addition remember that the cops claimed the boat was outside of the perimeter. That, it turns out, was a lie.

The fact that the police are always full of praise for themselves after an incident such as the Boston Marathon doesn't mean that they actually merit the praise. In most cases, a closer look will reveal that they are attempting to rewrite history and conceal their customary bumbling.
 
Ron Paul did not go far enough

It is depressing to think that we might have had a President Paul responding to this unprecedented attack on the American people by the police forces of the State if only the Republican Party had not insisted that Mitt Romney was "electable".
http://voxday.blogspot.com/2013/05/ron-paul-did-not-go-far-enough.html

Yeah.

But it wasn't the forces of the state I think, I think Obama called an emergency using the expanded post Katrina powers that let FEDERAL government "IMPOSE" one on states. I'm betting if we get to the bottom of it that is what happened.

9000 troops?

Boston PD wasn't the problem here.
 
Back
Top