emazur
Member
- Joined
- Oct 26, 2008
- Messages
- 5,280
Paul, whose anti-Iraq war views won him jeers at some Republican events in 2008, says a Libertarian-minded GOP candidate will be better received when Obama runs for re-election. But he cautioned that he himself has not decided to run. “It’s too early for me to talk much about that because I haven’t made a decision. I haven’t ruled it out, but I’m not on the verge of making a decision anytime soon,” Paul said.
Asked to name other potential presidential candidates he could support, Paul replied, “I guess the best one would be Johnson from New Mexico — Gary Johnson.”
Johnson, an ultra-marathon runner who was governor from 1995 to 2003 and endorsed Paul in 2008, is beloved by Libertarians for his many vetoes and privatizations while in office, and for championing school choice and drug decriminalization.
Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2010/06/21/r...rtarian-minded-nominee-in-2012/#ixzz0rT9taKYr
And WTF is David Boaz's problem?
“You can’t nominate just anybody, you have to nominate somebody,” Boaz said. “And plausible Libertarian-minded candidates are hard to find. Ron Paul may make some noise, and may run, but House members don’t get nominated for president. Gary Johnson has a great Libertarian record, but he doesn’t yet have much national recognition.”
Boaz did say that “a governor with a good record, like Mitch Daniels or Chris Christie, might be a candidate who could attract support from conservatives, lLbertarians, and independents,” if they could get around Romney.
First of all, Barack Obama was virtually unknown until he started his '07 campaign. Secondly, there is a tea party shake up of the establishment going on. And third, Ron Paul obviously does well with libertarians and independents, and "conservatives" will vote for whoever the hell the Republican party nominates. John McCain anyone? And besides that, RP even has some appeal to the left, while Obama's popularity there continues to wane.