Ron Paul Segment Coming Up On Tucker

[NinjaPirate]

Tucker didn't dis Paul, chill.

 

[saku39]

I just donated money.

Everytime I see a crappy article or piece like this on TV, I get mad and then go donate more money.

 

[ChooseLiberty]

THIS IS THE BEST IDEA.

I just donated money.

Everytime I see a crappy article or piece like this on TV, I get mad and then go donate more money.

 

[dircha]

Tucker didn't dis Paul, chill.

Whose program was that schmuck on?

Or should I say: Which schmuck's program was that schmuck on?

Oh, right, our good old "friend" Tucker.

He may as well as have used his program as a platform for Giuliani himself to openly bash and demean Ron Paul.

 

[Adamsa]

As long as they keep doing specials on Ron, I'm happy with them really.

 

[American]

Turns out Stein has a wiki page.....

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joel_Stein

Someone write a review would ya?

 

[Dlynne]

Whoa, people.

This was not as bad as most of you think. Joel Stein isn't familiar with the kind of philosophies that Ron Paul and his supporters stand for, and most people aren't, actually. When you are used to the welfare state, and central planning, ideas of true liberty and freedom take getting used to.

So what if he thinks we are nerds. I like what the other poster wrote, "I rather be a nerd in a free society, than a hispter living in chains," or something like that. It is up to show them what is cool, and Paul's ideas are definitely cool. The word is getting out there.

 

[me3]

[email protected] email bombs away :O

No need for email bombs. Get out and hand out some slim Jims. Be productive.

If you have time to email media members, you have time to join the Iowa email campaign. PM me for details.

 

[Alabama Supporter]

You all are acting CRAZY. Geez, everyone is not going to drink the koolaid. You don't have to harass the guy for writing a crappy article. As a matter of fact, alot of people are likely to be drawn in from his article.

 

[Zack]

I agree that Tucker didn't attack Paul. Although, the other guy clearly did, and was almost certainly being intentionally misleading more than he was ignorant. Tucker himself seemed pretty clueless on the grassroots campaign. I think he actually thought he was getting a sincere explanation from that guy, which is a shame. Tucker should have done, at least a mininal amount of research first.

I've seen a few people from the media reference the Nov 5th fundraiser, and it's always used as an example of, not just the fringe nature of the campaign, but... the fringe of the fringe. So extreme that one of the only libertarians on TV laughs at it.

I just hope it makes a good pile of money and is able to remain a comedic footnote and not get the media attention it was designed to get, cause the attention wouldn't be positive. That's just not the way people think.

 

[NinjaPirate]

This just gave Stein some air-time to do some trash talk. Stein was just doing some name calling and is acting juvenile at best. Not only that he has the speaking skills of a 19 year old college drop out.

Just see this as encouragement. This hit piece only adds fuel to the fire, as it just drives us to push even harder. If what he said angers you so much, then donate, haha.

 

[me3]

That sounds like something that Ron Paul would do.

Donate when you are angry. Donate until you are happy or maxed out!

 

[Flirple]

Folks, we need to toughen our skin! Responding with a bunch of emotionally fueled hostile emails is going to help correct his stereotype of us how?

All press is good press but if you don't like stories like this then take the cheap shots as both flattery and as motivation to maybe behave a bit more civilly when posting comments on line (lay off the profanity, Inside Job, zionist, etc. talk for crying out loud) and when at rallies and sign wavings.

 

[ladyliberty]

If what he said angers you so much, then donate, haha.

The best REVENGE is to get Ron Paul the Presidency!

IGNORE the bad PR and donate your "mad money" to the campaign!!!

 

[paulitics]

I agree that Tucker didn't attack Paul. Although, the other guy clearly did, and was almost certainly being intentionally misleading more than he was ignorant. Tucker himself seemed pretty clueless on the grassroots campaign. I think he actually thought he was getting a sincere explanation from that guy, which is a shame. Tucker should have done, at least a mininal amount of research first.

I've seen a few people from the media reference the Nov 5th fundraiser, and it's always used as an example of, not just the fringe nature of the campaign, but... the fringe of the fringe. So extreme that one of the only libertarians on TV laughs at it.

I just hope it makes a good pile of money and is able to remain a comedic footnote and not get the media attention it was designed to get, cause the attention wouldn't be positive. That's just not the way people think.

no doubt. Tuckers reaction to this makes me think that this is going to go really badly. "thats even farther out than I even realized".

 

[NinjaPirate]

no doubt. Tuckers reaction to this makes me think that this is going to go really badly. "thats even farther out than I even realized".

HOPEFULLY Tucker will do his research...

 

[mavtek]

Didn't seem that bad to me, I'm certainly not all that worried about it. We're not yet competing in the General election.

 

[American]

For me its real simple, if they want to know about the Ron Paul Revolution then maybe they should ask one is his supporters.

This was a hit piece to marginalize RP, its bullshit

 

[ronpaulfan]

The coverage wasn't that bad. I still hate Tucker.

 

[paulitics]

HOPEFULLY Tucker will do his research...

Tucker is the most libertarian of any pundit. I think he was off guard, but knew who Guy Falkes was.