RON PAUL PWNS MITT ROMNEY

No, I'm good, no other secrets. I knew what I was saying was going to get distorted and misinterpreted from the get-go so I don't know why I bothered trying to present a different viewpoint.

Keep presenting your viewpoints.
I agree with what you were saying and it looks like I'm not the only one.
 
I'm pretty sure these are intended as hype-videos for all of us who are already supporters, and what's wrong with that? Not every video needs to be super educational. :)

Ron said to have FUN too!

Exactly... I think someone should crank it up a notch and see what can be done with the wealth of teabagging videos out there.
 
Keep presenting your viewpoints.
I agree with what you were saying and it looks like I'm not the only one.

Yer all a lovely bunch of armchair critics and I want to personally thank you from the bottom of somewhere for letting us know how you feel negatively about someones work and want to change it. You all need to get together and form an art directors censorship guild that all videos must be passed through and vetted for loudness, serious content, obsequious bootlicking compliance to your sensibilities and of course political expediency. That oughta fix this horrible problem and bat down any reoccurrences of such vile materials.

HTH
Rev9
 
Yer all a lovely bunch of armchair critics and I want to personally thank you from the bottom of somewhere for letting us know how you feel negatively about someones work and want to change it. You all need to get together and form an art directors censorship guild that all videos must be passed through and vetted for loudness, serious content, obsequious bootlicking compliance to your sensibilities and of course political expediency. That oughta fix this horrible problem and bat down any reoccurrences of such vile materials.

HTH
Rev9


lol. what the...?

I swear, online forums are like entering the bizarro world sometimes.
 
Revolution9 said:
You all need to get together and form an art directors censorship guild that all videos must be passed through and vetted for loudness, serious content, obsequious bootlicking compliance to your sensibilities and of course political expediency.

Anybody who actually laughed out loud, AND agreed, please, for the love of Randy, please +rep.... holy cow I've never laughed so hard on a Saturday night..
 
Nice video. Please keep doing what you're doing. We need to have lots of different styles of video and material out there. Different styles appeal to different people.


:)
 
I agree. I love some pro paul videos but the loudness turns me off

Keep presenting your viewpoints.
I agree with what you were saying and it looks like I'm not the only one.

Well thanks, definitely wasn't expecting those responses. :)

Yer all a lovely bunch of armchair critics and I want to personally thank you from the bottom of somewhere for letting us know how you feel negatively about someones work and want to change it. You all need to get together and form an art directors censorship guild that all videos must be passed through and vetted for loudness, serious content, obsequious bootlicking compliance to your sensibilities and of course political expediency. That oughta fix this horrible problem and bat down any reoccurrences of such vile materials.

HTH
Rev9

Oh please, I could give a rat's ass about what people put in their videos. I would never go as far as saying what should and shouldn't be included. All I offered was a somewhat overlooked opinion and a hypothetical situation for the big supporters of these videos to ponder.

Let's go back to my previous post. I've put in bold the overlooked, and seemingly unpopular opinion as well as the hypothetical situation I constructed.
I'm just not that big of a fan of all the bells and whistles people put on videos to promote something. (In this case, Dr. Paul)
Watching the debate highlights of Ron Paul or any similar interview clips should in itself be enough. As soon as the phrase, "PWND" comes into the situation along with a plethora of ridiculous sounds and visuals, the video loses some credibility. Sure to us Pro-Paul guys it doesn't make much difference, but what will an undecided voter, or someone with allegiance to another candidate think? That is definitely something to ponder.
My intent isn't to discourage the makers of these types of videos by any means, I'm just not that big of a fan.

And the last thing I put in bold text was my final concession. While I admit that I was not a fan of the video, my intent of my post was not to discourage the makers of the videos. If anything, keep making them, the more Pro-Paul videos on Youtube, the better chance of somebody seeing it who might be undecided or not in Paul's corner...but with that being said, let's hope those people, who are not already Pro-Paul like myself, don't feel the same way I do about the video. It COULD give them a negative connotation of Ron, and that can only hurt us.
 
I like the Rick Perry one better. I want to cut 3 departments, the... uh (help me out here Ron)
I like that one, too. Technically, though, I don't think that one's a case of Ron Paul pwning Rick Perry. It's a case of "autopwnage" (Rick Perry pwning himself).
 
I LOL'd. I don't think it was meant as a super serious video making an amazing point. Just funzies.
 
for those that do not like the sounds, you have 2 options turn your audio down or mute it! If the video is not for you then fine. No need to trash his video, make your own!
 
Back
Top