Ron Paul primary/caucus results 2008 vs 2012

Joined
May 12, 2007
Messages
2,942
2008 results by state

Iowa - more than double
2008: 11,841 votes (10%)
2012: 26,036 votes (21%)

New Hampshire - more than triple
2008: 18,346 votes (8%)
2012: 56,848 votes (23%)

South Carolina - more than quadruple
2008: 16,154 votes (4%)
2012: 77,993 votes (13%) (updated 1/22)

Florida
2008: 62,887 votes (3%)
2012: likely 9-10%

If the "more than triple" trend holds true for other states, here are states to look forward to:
(2008 percentages listed in parentheses)
  • District of Columbia (8%)
  • Washington (8% listed as primary, 22% listed as caucus)
  • Rhode Island (7%)
  • Vermont (7%)
  • Pennsylvania (16%)
  • Indiana (8%)
  • North Carolina (7%)
  • Kentucky (7%)
  • Oregon (15%)
  • Idaho (24%)
  • New Mexico (14%)
  • South Dakota (17%)
  • Kansas (11%)
  • North Dakota (21%)
  • Montana (25%)
  • Minnesota (16%)
  • Colorado (9%)
  • Alaska (17%)
  • Maine (18%)
  • Nevada (14%)
 
Last edited:
South Carolina - likely more than triple
2008: 16,154 votes (4%)
2012: estimated 13%
Thanks for doing the math. +rep.
In terms of votes in SC, RP could actually quadruple his numbers
With 82% counted, he already has 60,732 votes.
16,154*4=64,616. That's absolutely possible.
 
Thanks for doing the math. +rep.
In terms of votes in SC, RP could actually quadruple his numbers
With 82% counted, he already has 60,732 votes.
16,154*4=64,616. That's absolutely possible.

Quadruple is pretty freaking awesome considering how little time he spent there!
 
The PACS and Grassroots need to buy local airtime in the early States that expose out biggest enemy - Corporate Media

Let the Campaign expose the other Candidates. We HAVE to fight the Media or they will win like they did in 2008.
 
Thanks for this post. It is important for all to be reminded of the huge shift that has taken place since 2007. Not only with the increase in Paul supporters, but that Paul issues are being considered in both the Republican and Democratic parties. We created a Tea Party, we got a partial audit of the FED, we now have more people that even understand the FED, and even though other political hacks won't give Paul credit, his policies are being implimented to some degree whereas four years ago they were just laughed at. It is disappointing that Paul didn't do better in SC, but we need to keep our eye on the big picture and here the momentum is in the right direction. The Revolution continues!
 
Here are a couple numbers. We can do SC after it's done.

Iowa - 219% of 2008 votes
New Hampshire - 310% of 2008 votes
South Carolina - 429% of 2008 votes (with 85% reporting)

That's one HELL of a trend line.

Keep the faith, and keep your perspective.
 
Last edited:
So we're getting STRONGER with time...EXCELLENT. It seems to me, too, that the amount of time and money has been inverse to the percentage gains.
 
So we're getting STRONGER with time...EXCELLENT. It seems to me, too, that the amount of time and money has been inverse to the percentage gains.
Yeah, considering he didn't go full-court press in SC, and it's grassroots not media building the counts, that's freakin' amazing. Bodes well for the future.
 
Update:

Iowa - 219% of 2008 votes
New Hampshire - 310% of 2008 votes
South Carolina - 477% of 2008 votes (with 94% reporting)

Spread those figures far and wide. Great news.
 
The google one says 95% reporting and Beaufort county hasn't reported yet.
 
I'll wait for the final from SC election board tomorrow before a final update. Those numbers are critical information.

Think on this for a while. Does anybody know how yeast multiplies? Now think about how a grassroots movement grows.

Now reflect on those numbers for a while. :)
 
800px-2008primarycounties.png

 
Back
Top