Ron Paul on Thom Hartmann NOW

Kade said:
I would actively help you in that goal if my label wasn't also abused as such... sorry. If I'm a liberal by the way you define it, than you are a libertarian the way Hartmann and others defines it. Fair?
Click to expand...

Agreed. I can live with the "Pot, Porn & Gambling" label.
 
kcroyalscott said:
Hmmm Still no link. This interview really didn't go well... Ha
Click to expand...

Hartmann is not a slouch. I would be pleasantly surprised to see a link to the interview on a Pro-Paul site, they don't tend to post the links where RP gets refuted soundly about the Constitution...
 
Kade said:
Considering the amount of death and destruction of life in the bible, I imagine the societal understanding of the devil would talk about the bible often... it has been used to destroy more than it has been used to save...

I don't know why you are laughing, I don't really think you know what you are talking about.

He is a very well read scholar and analysis of the Constitution actually...

http://www.commondreams.org/views06/0129-26.htm


You know, my opponents on this forum seem to think laughing in all caps proves something... I doubt you even listen to Hartmann.
Click to expand...

You missed my point. But you seem to be so caught up in yourself you can't see outside yourself.

Why would you have opponents on Ron Paul Forums? Curious.

Lastly, I don't find you important enough, nor interesting enough to be my opponent. Sorry.
 
Last edited:
I think me and Kade are one of the few on these forums willing to pick one of the lesser evils, Obama "Karl Marx" Hussein aka Jeremiah Farrakhan, for him and John "McLame Amnesty, the leftist enviro-nut" McCain for me.

Would be nice to have more debate about the those two guys other than the same old "SCRew THose NWO Puppets! I'm not voting!!11!1".
 
Last edited:
V-rod said:
I think me and Kade are one of the few on these forums willing to pick one of the lesser evils, Obama "Karl Marx" Hussein aka Jeremiah Farrakhan, for him and John "McLame Amnesty, the leftist enviro-nut" McCain for me.

Would be nice to have more debate about the those two guys other than the same old "SCRew THose NWO Puppets! I'm not voting!!11!1".
Click to expand...

That is on the both of you! What is there to talk about?

The same tactic you use on us, we can use on you.
"I will vote for the lesser of two evils because otherwise we are handing the country someone worse..." or <--- fill in your own hypothesis on why you will vote for the special interest controlled shill. Does it really matter? You like snickers, Kade likes Reeses <-- different flavors but its candy nonetheless. Still bad for you. Just boils down to a personal preference on something bad.

If voters would break the stranglehold that the two party (controlled and manuevered) system has on us, by voting for alternatives - we'd be out of this mess by now. BUT, we still buy into that "voting for the lesser of two evils". What does it matter then? If BOTH of your choices, like the federal reserve chairman, are given to the people by those in power - what does it matter who you vote for. You are feigned a choice, but you have no choice. You are voting for a flavoring of sugar, but your tooth is still gonna rot.

CHUCK BALDIN or BARR or If I have the chance I will write RON PAUL'S name in.

Most of us here have more concerns than "debating" on why we should or should not vote for special interests shills. We have a country to worry about. We really don't need to get into a "debate" with those who are not truly interested in spreading the freedom message. But moreso than any of that - we dine not to play the same game, with the same rules anymore. We want change. We want to awaken people, yet we play the game and still vote the way we are told - that makes no sense. Our conscious is now important.
 
Last edited:
V-rod said:
I really hate Air America
Click to expand...

When Mark Riley was on, I used to call it Air Mexico. That SOB called me a racist for telling him that most of the mexican on the produce docks in California was illegal..........Considering that I used to pick up produce there every week. And talked to alot of the dock workers (at least the ones that could speak english).

I haven't listened to Air America in a long time. And I don't miss it. Liberals think that the Government should hold everyones hand (even the ones that don't want it) from cradle to grave. And that when you actually reach the middle to upper class, then you should be banished from society for making too much money.

Mike Malloy was fun to listen to most of the time though.
 
Lord Xar said:
That is on the both of you! What is there to talk about?

The same tactic you use on us, we can use on you.
"I will vote for the lesser of two evils because otherwise we are handing the country someone worse..." or <--- fill in your own hypothesis on why you will vote for the special interest controlled shill. Does it really matter? You like snickers, Kade likes Reeses <-- different flavors but its candy nonetheless. Still bad for you. Just boils down to a personal preference on something bad.

If voters would break the stranglehold that the two party (controlled and manuevered) system has on us, by voting for alternatives - we'd be out of this mess by now. BUT, we still buy into that "voting for the lesser of two evils". What does it matter then? If BOTH of your choices, like the federal reserve chairman, are given to the people by those in power - what does it matter who you vote for. You are feigned a choice, but you have no choice. You are voting for a flavoring of sugar, but your tooth is still gonna rot.

CHUCK BALDIN or BARR or If I have the chance I will write RON PAUL'S name in.

Most of us here have more concerns than "debating" on why we should or should not vote for special interests shills. We have a country to worry about. We really don't need to get into a "debate" with those who are not truly interested in spreading the freedom message. But moreso than any of that - we dine not to play the same game, with the same rules anymore. We want change. We want to awaken people, yet we play the game and still vote the way we are told - that makes no sense. Our conscious is now important.
Click to expand...


I'm like you. I don't really trust Barr or Baldwin. But I know McCain and Obama will continue this marmongering foreign policy. Both will continue the wars in the middle east. Both will support Homeland Security, illegal immigration, and big Government.

Voting for a 3rd party can't be any worse than what we have now. Problem is, if a third party doesn't change anything, then that's the worst it can get.
Understand? By getting our hopes up for real change and then not getting it when all the effort was put into help those candidates get elected.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Matt Collins
Rand Joins Efforts to Retake Legislative Authority from Unaccountable Administrative State
Replies
0
Views
1K
Matt Collins
Matt Collins
Bryan
Greatest Ron Paul videos
Replies
0
Views
410
Bryan
Bryan
Brian4Liberty
Dr. Rand Paul Joins Fox News to Talk Tariffs and Kentucky Bourbon
Replies
0
Views
1K
Brian4Liberty
Brian4Liberty
Matt Collins
Rand condems Trump conviction in letter to Garland
Replies
0
Views
314
Matt Collins
Matt Collins
susano
Dems & RINOs try to remove veto power on future Ukraine endless funding
2
Replies
34
Views
2K
Swordsmyth
Swordsmyth
Back
Top