Ron Paul on Thom Hartmann NOW

[powerofreason]

airhead america... thought they went bankrupt a while back. guess not

 

[Kade]

Dr. Paul on Thom Hartmann now!

http://airamerica.com/thomhartmannpage/

Hartmann is one of my favorite liberals... many of my positions were influenced by his writings and his radio show. He responds to me often when I write to him. Good to see that he is talking to Ron Paul.

 

[Kade]

I'm not I took issue with that statement, too, though. It was more the way he said it-- like Libertarians are the ultimate blend of all that is wrong with society.

Libertarians attack Liberals. I think it only fair they get some in return... no?

 

[Kade]

so does anyone have a link of the entire interview? All I can find is them talking about the dept of education and if it's constitutional or not. The fact they actually had a conversation about the Constitution is a step above anything on mainstream tv.

Hartmann always talks about the Constitution.

 

[frasu]

anybody has the mp3 of this? or maybe is not worth it...

 

[Kludge]

Libertarians attack Liberals. I think it only fair they get some in return... no?

No. We're factually correct when we call non-libertarians the scum of the earth.

 

[Kade]

anybody has the mp3 of this? or maybe is not worth it...

You stole my sig...

 

[ClayTrainor]

anybody has the mp3 of this? or maybe is not worth it...

i wouldnt mind listening to this myself.

 

[Kade]

No. We're factually correct when we call non-libertarians the scum of the earth.

Libertarians don't even agree with each other...

 

[Lord Xar]

Hartmann always talks about the Constitution.

HAHAHAHHAHAHHAA.... LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL

That is like saying "The devil talks about the bible".

 

[Kludge]

Libertarians don't even agree with each other...

On what?

Here's all I can think of...

+Which dept's to cut, from 90% to 100%
+"Truth"
+God

"libertarian" liberals and authoritarian liberals disagree on issues.

 

[Kade]

HAHAHAHHAHAHHAA.... LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL

That is like saying "The devil talks about the bible".

Considering the amount of death and destruction of life in the bible, I imagine the societal understanding of the devil would talk about the bible often... it has been used to destroy more than it has been used to save...

I don't know why you are laughing, I don't really think you know what you are talking about.

He is a very well read scholar and analysis of the Constitution actually...

http://www.commondreams.org/views06/0129-26.htm


You know, my opponents on this forum seem to think laughing in all caps proves something... I doubt you even listen to Hartmann.

 

[Kade]

On what?

"libertarian" liberals and authoritarian liberals disagree on issues.

Anarchist libertarians, conservative libertarians, objectivists, left-libertarians, minarchist, and anarcho capitalists all differ on many issues.

 

[LittleLightShining]

Considering the amount of death and destruction of life in the bible, I imagine the societal understanding of the devil would talk about the bible often... it has been used to destroy more than it has been used to save...

I don't know why you are laughing, I don't really think you know what you are talking about.

He is a very well read scholar and analysis of the Constitution actually...

http://www.commondreams.org/views06/0129-26.htm


You know, my opponents on this forum seem to think laughing in all caps proves something... I doubt you even listen to Hartmann.

He has Bernie Sanders on on Fridays and I try to listen to him then since Bernie is my senator.

 

[Kludge]

Anarchist libertarians, conservative libertarians, objectivists, left-libertarians, minarchist, and anarcho capitalists all differ on many issues.

left-libertarians don't exist. The others have virtually no disagreements on policies (except whether to cut 95% of all gov't programs or 100%).

 

[Kade]

left-libertarians don't exist. The others have virtually no disagreements on policies (except whether to cut 95% of all gov't programs or 100%).

Left-libertarians do exist.

 

[Kludge]

Left-libertarians do exist.

Those are libertarian liberals. You can be influenced by libertarianism as a liberal, but not liberalism as a libertarian.

 

[Kade]

Those are libertarian liberals. You can be influenced by libertarianism as a liberal, but not liberalism as a libertarian.

Familiar: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No_true_Scotsman

Labels are stupid, that I can admit, but pretending that your label is better than some other chumps label is like the "two girls and one cup" arguing about the color of the cup.

 

[Kludge]

Familiar: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No_true_Scotsman

Labels are stupid, that I can admit, but pretending that your label is better than some other chumps label is like the "two girls and one cup" arguing about the color of the cup.

I don't want my label bastardized/confused any more then it already is.

 

[Kade]

I don't want my label bastardized/confused any more then it already is.

I would actively help you in that goal if my label wasn't also abused as such... sorry. If I'm a liberal by the way you define it, than you are a libertarian the way Hartmann and others defines it. Fair?