iloveronpaul
Member
- Joined
- Jun 28, 2007
- Messages
- 216
When they attack we win. 

Those are some very loaded articles. First off, the National Ledger guy writes that he's "extremely disappointed with his performance", so there he's acknowledging some kind of personal emotional investment in this. The other two articles are very transparent in their agendas: "After admitting he would decriminalize drugs at the national level" is a good example of that. "Admitting?" Please. Find some better articles.
It's awesome how the only ways they can attack RP are on issues that are quite simply, very absurd. Earmarks? And then he votes against them? Oh how dare he! Just because you're against the system doesn't mean you can't use it.
All in all, a very good interview. RP handled himself great.
You guys need to take your rose tinted glasses off. Ron Paul looked bad. He sounded shrill. Especially when he kept saying stuff like, "oh, come on, that's a misquote" and he got HAMMERED on the earmark question, and also on the question about running as a third party candidate. He looked bad, I was really disappointed.
Note to Tim Russert: Amending the Contitution is Constitutional!
Tim Russert: "you say your a strict constructionist to the constitution and yet you want to amend the constitution to say that children born here should not automatically be US Citizens."
Ron Paul: "Amending the constitution is constitutional, what the contradiction there?"
Gotta laugh at that one.
He did phenomenally on the earmark thing.
He does not believe in the tax code, BUT of COURSE he will use his tax credits. Why is that hard to understand....that was a brilliant example. SOme poeple will be lsot becasue of their lack of understanding.... oh well.
If you pay money for a service.... right or wrong, then you deserve the benefit of the service. The only way Paul could have looked "bad" is if he voted to get rid of taxes yet still claim a tax credit.... make sense? No
Great job, Russert was hard, Paul did very well for those able to think for themselves.