Ron Paul on Libertarianism as True Conservatism

sailingaway

Member
Joined
Mar 7, 2010
Messages
72,103
http://www.southernavenger.com/unca...sm-as-true-conservatism/#.US7VJgHC-NM.twitter

quotes Ron Paul from his 2010 CPAC speech:

“There is nothing wrong with describing conservatism as protecting the Constitution…” “As I have said so many times, it’s time that we do study and, and understand from a conservative view, conservative viewpoint on how much we should be engaged around the world.” “That is a neoconservative viewpoint and not true conservatism…” “But we have done a few other things that aren’t conservative as far as I’m concerned…” “But there is nothing wrong with you being a conservative and saying the Republican conservative tradition not too long ago, as recent as year 2000, we won elections by saying we shouldn’t be the policemen of the world….” “So there’s every reason for us to think seriously about, you know, what, what we really believe, what conservatism actually really means…” “We, as conservatives…”

I consider myself conservative, the 'libertarian label' is too fought over. But I do believe in principles, call them what you may. Labels aren't the point.

I note that despite Hunter's title, Ron never says anything about libertarianism, much less 'L'ibertarianism, just about conservativism.

 
Last edited:
If you want to bend the meanings of words to coalition-build, I guess that's okay. It's going to be a rather tenuous coalition though, and will fall apart (to some extent or another).
 
I think principles should stay true, I don't say call them something else, just that I'm not confused, personally, when people like Beck try to put a name they want, momentarily, on actions that don't line up. I think Ron is absolutely conservative, but I think Beck is a shill, and regardless of what you call either, they will remain who they are.
 
If needed I can find you plenty of videos of Ron talking about libertarianism.

Conservatives don't fight against the drug war, ID systems, raw milk raids, etc, etc.
 
If needed I can find you plenty of videos of Ron talking about libertarianism.

.


I know he has.

But it doesn't MATTER what you call it because he is who he is and stands for what he stands for. But to say terms he has used for himself means everyone else who uses the terms stands for the same is just a nonstarter, if that is what he was implying.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top