Ron Paul never got more than 10 percent of the vote according to neocon advocate

[Truthseeker_007]

John McCain, NeoCons, the Israel Lobby and Weekly Standard (USS Liberty and Ron Paul mentioned):



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gfLeZXrluZw


http://neoconzionistthreat.blogspot.com/2008/03/make-people-aware-subscribe.html

Here is a tiny URL of the above one:

http://tinyurl.com/358b8c





Be sure to also access both pages of http://NEOCONZIONISTTHREAT.BLOGSPOT.COM (click on the pictures).

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

6 Signs the U.S. May Be Headed for War in Iran


http://www.itszone.co.uk/zone0/viewtopic.php?t=71055&start=670

Here is a tiny URL of the above one:

http://tinyurl.com/39qkun


http://NOMOREWARFORISRAEL.BLOGSPOT.COM

 

[The One]

Unfortunately, I think that is an accurate statement.

 

[ReneeSaffron]

According to the election reports (which are anything but accurate I'm afraid)Ron Paul received:
14% in Nevada
25% in Montana
11% in Kansas
16% in Minnesota
19% in Main

I'm not sure how much he received in WV. Supposedly not one person in the entire state voted for him, but I happen to know for a fact that that is not true. Sigh. For all we know he could have won all the primaries by a landslide, but neither the rigged voting machines nor the people who have decided who will win the elections are going to tell us that!

 

[TulsaRevolution]

Paul received double digits in caucuses, but never in a popular vote straw poll. At least thats the way the "votes" got "counted". Unfortunate but true. After watching the process, I really think a well informed few (caucuses) are a better judge at this early stage in the process (selecting the party's candidate for the general election later this year) - The general public doesn't go by anything but vague assumptions, which makes media manipulation easier than at any other point. At least by November, with the field narrowed down, the general public gets a little more actual information on the candidates. Still in a flawed sense, but at least not as bad as what they are basing their votes on in Jan, Feb, March of an election year.

Vote fraud cannot be ignored when you see the huge differences between small direct participation caucuses and delegate processes versus the results of the popular vote straw polls. One of the key differences is that caucuses are hard to lie about.