Ron Paul needs replacements after his retirement!!!!!

[Canderson]

I'm making this post to advocate for more subforums for strong liberty candidates in winnable races. Personally I would like to see a new subforum for Kurt Bills and a new subforum for Karen Kwiatkowski. Bills is running for Senate and is pretty well protected in the primary, and if he was granted the kind of attention Rand got in 2010 he would likely win the general and Minnesota could mimic the success Liberty candidates have had in Kentucky. Kwiatkowski is the first time primary challenger of the incumbent Goodlatte in Virginia. She has a strong volunteer base, has won multiple straw polls and Goodlatte is not fiercely campaigning in an attempt to minimize the challenge.

PLEASE moderators! Karen has gone so far as to come to RPF's chat room (where supposedly people weren't familiar with her!!!!) and part of the forums becoming powerful in politics is rewarding the ideologically pure candidates who cater to the forums. Much good can come from subforums for these outstanding candidates!

 

[Canderson]

PS everyone should come see the good doctor at the event my Youth for Ron Paul Chapter is holding at UC DAVIS today! the anticipation is killing me

 

[fisharmor]

Ron Paul can never be replaced, only succeeded.

 

[Canderson]

If you aren't familiar with Karen Kwiatkowski you should be.

http://youtu.be/cTlGIh4pWyk

the whole documentary:
http://youtu.be/SWyhOKbqdEQ

 

[sailingaway]

Josh needs to approve a new forum. I don't like the 'replacement' bit in the title because I don't think either can replace Ron, but forums are usually generated by interest so you could take this down and put up a poll as to how many want those two specific forums and Josh might take it into account (or he might just think we are poll addicts, I dunno). But those two forums have been requested before. It isn't going to get to the point where everyone someone likes is going to have a subforum, though, there needs to be general interest.

 

[Canderson]

Josh needs to approve a new forum. I don't like the 'replacement' bit in the title because I don't think either can replace Ron, but forums are usually generated by interest so you could take this down and put up a poll as to how many want those two specific forums and Josh might take it into account (or he might just think we are poll addicts, I dunno). But those two forums have been requested before. It isn't going to get to the point where everyone someone likes is going to have a subforum, though, there needs to be general interest.

True, replacement is probably not the best choice of words. The problem is that we have an 8 page advocation thats being ignored in 2012 candidates. http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?366320-Karen-Kwiatkowski-need-her-own-sub-forum

How much more support is needed?

As far as Bills goes, how is he the only YAL endorsed candidate without a subforum? http://www.yaliberty.org/pac

I don't remember seeing a push for support for a Massie forum. It just went up

 

[Anna4RonPaul]

Ron Paul can never be replaced, only succeeded.

Amen!

 

[Canderson]

Can a mod change he title from Replace to Succeed

 

[Canderson]

I'd like to know the reasoning behind the no vote?

 

[Blue]

Ron Paul can never be replaced, only succeeded.

This

 

[sailingaway]

True, replacement is probably not the best choice of words. The problem is that we have an 8 page advocation thats being ignored in 2012 candidates. http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?366320-Karen-Kwiatkowski-need-her-own-sub-forum

How much more support is needed?

As far as Bills goes, how is he the only YAL endorsed candidate without a subforum? http://www.yaliberty.org/pac

I don't remember seeing a push for support for a Massie forum. It just went up

Mods and Josh had interest in Massie as with Glen, we know them. They CAME OUT OF this community. YAL is not the determiner but obviously our interest is often piqued by the same people.

 

[sailingaway]

Can a mod change he title from Replace to Succeed

that would still be unclear. Why don't you say something like "Do you think [Karen] and/or [Bills] should have their own subforum?" then make your case for them. But it is Josh's site after all is said and done, I just know that major member interest is one of the things that gets his attention.

 

[Canderson]

Why does the enthusiasm for Paul completely disappear when it comes to congressional and senate campaigns?

 

[Canderson]

that would still be unclear. Why don't you say something like "Do you think [Karen] and/or [Bills] should have their own subforum?" then make your case for them. But it is Josh's site after all is said and done, I just know that major member interest is one of the things that gets his attention.

Honestly I'm not set in stone that it be Bills and Kwiatkowski, I just think the forum's moderators need to add liberty candidates subfroums, which ever way they decide which candidates is not as important to me. There is a problem that to many enthusiastic supporters go home after the presidential election.