Ron Paul mentions a poor argument for McCain [RPH - EDIT]

Status
Not open for further replies.
Geez.

Uhh, Ron Paul said that Obama was the lesser of two evils (probably more like 2 months ago), because he would do less damage with our foreign policy. If you want blood on your hands, vote McCain. If you want bloody socialism on your hands, vote Obama.

Now foreign policy is out of the spotlight so McCain is the lesser of two evils at the moment..

I don't know why he goes back and forth, I think he was making up for his prior transgression.


Got ya... sorry I mis read it... have a link for this?
 

Yes, you did, because you misrepresented what Ron Paul said (just like you did in the other threads where you made the same claim).

What Ron Paul actually said was "Even with all the shortcomings of John McCain, his strongest argument to be President is keeping Congress and the Presidency in separate hands- the American people are going to be better off if they are fighting a little bit instead of having no restraints whatsoever. Thats a poor reason to argue for McCain. Its a poor argument for McCain."

Despite your lies and misrepresentations, most of us still see McCain for the vile statist asshole that he is, and will NEVER vote for him.
 
You are a troll. Go away.
There is no debate. Only your desperate attempts at distortion and propaganda.

The ban hammer should be soon to come.

The more EndtheFed talks, the more I feel like casting a vote for Obama just to spite this a-hole...
 
Ahhh I see you are for freedom of speach mm nice...

1st amendment restricts the government from restricting your speech, not a private forum owner and his site moderation.
I do understand you don't know anything about the constitution, but I'm sure many here can fill the ignorant void in your head.
 
It's funny how some of you talk about voting like it actually matters or makes a difference. lulz
 
Yes, you did, because you misrepresented what Ron Paul said (just like you did in the other threads where you made the same claim).

What Ron Paul actually said was "Even with all the shortcomings of John McCain, his strongest argument to be President is keeping Congress and the Presidency in separate hands- the American people are going to be better off if they are fighting a little bit instead of having no restraints whatsoever. Thats a poor reason to argue for McCain. Its a poor argument for McCain."

Despite your lies and misrepresentations, most of us still see McCain for the vile statist asshole that he is, and will NEVER vote for him.

I did not mis represent him
 
Got ya... sorry I mis read it... have a link for this?

Well there is a youtube out there somewhere, it was on CNN Situation Room with Wolf Blitzer..

here's a summary:


Source: CNN

(CNN) — Even though Rep. Ron Paul has never officially ended his long shot presidential bid, he’s ready to weigh in on the three remaining major candidates for the White House.

In an interview on The Situation Room, Paul told Wolf Blitzer that endorsing Sen. John McCain, the Republican Party’s presumptive nominee, “would really confuse” his supporters “because they know we have a precise program and we have to defend that program.”

Having a Republican win the upcoming presidential election is “secondary” for Paul who is more interested in defending the Constitution, having the country go in what he considers the right direction, having a sound currency, and achieving balanced budgets. Paul parts ways with McCain over McCain’s support for the Iraq war, his approach to U.S. foreign policy in the Middle East and his willingness to spend federal dollars to support military operations in Iraq.

Instead, Paul favors Sen. Barack Obama because of positions on foreign policy. “But that’s doesn’t mean that’s an endorsement,” Paul quickly added.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top