Ron Paul: McCain friends with Feingold, Kennedy

colecrowe

Member
Joined
Nov 20, 2007
Messages
1,841
http://weblogs.baltimoresun.com/news/politics/blog/2008/02/ron_paul_mccain_friends_with_f.html




Ron Paul: McCain friends with Feingold, Kennedy

by Mark Silva
After the smoke cleared at the Conservative Political Action Conference – the public withdrawal of Mitt Romney from the Republican presidential race, and the attempt of John McCain to make friends with the party’s staunchest conservatives – a conservative crowd-pleaser stepped forward .
Ron Paul, the Republican representative from Texas.
Paul was playing on the frustrations in this hall, with many voicing worries about McCain, the all-but annointed nominee.
Now the party has an apparent candidate who is a friend of Sen. Russ Feingold – on campaign finance reform – Paul said. And now the party has an apparent candidate who is a friend of Ted Kennedy – on immigration – Paul said.
He raised cheers in the hall – perhaps the first genuine cheers of the day.
“If you think we can lead this country back to conservative principles… you have another thing coming, because it’s not going to happen,’’ Paul said.


“The answer is found in fiscal conservatism – live within our means,’’ he said to cheers in the hall.
“As long as a government can stir up fear, sometimes real and sometimes not real, the people are expected to do one thing, sacrifice their liberty,’’ he said to cheers.
And then there is the war in Iraq, with Paul the only one of several Republican candidates for president this year who took a stance against the war.
.
“McCain says we should stay there for 100 years if necessary – I say there is no need,’’ Paul said to more cheers in the hall.

“We campaigned in 2000 for a humble foreign policy, no policing of the world – and now we are doing the very same thing,’’ Paul said.
But this is where he started to lose his audience: “Iraq had nothing to do with 9/1’’ The Paulites in the hall were happy, but the rest of the crowd was starting to part ways with a Republican who has sharply parted ways with most of the candidates.
Yet, while the Romney campaign folds its tent, the Paul campaign carries on.


Posted by Mark Silva on February 7, 2008 5:00 PM
 
Although it's the obvious truth...the 9/11 Iraq thing is a tough thing to sell and bringing it up as a political figure pretty much throws a giant red 'Truther' stamp on your forehead.
 
Although it's the obvious truth...the 9/11 Iraq thing is a tough thing to sell and bringing it up as a political figure pretty much throws a giant red 'Truther' stamp on your forehead.


Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11 - what is wrong with going ahead and admitting that?

Al Queda terrorists based in AFGHANISTAN at the time are who are responsible for 9/11. That is the message he needs to drill into everyone's thick skulls.

What is so blatantly truther about telling the truth the whole truth and nothing but the truth?

There ought to be a movie put together that pins the responsibility of 9/11 directly to the 19 men and those who helped them and get the attention redirected towards finding and capturing them rather than punishing a whole country for the sins of a few. It should mention the solution of papers of Marque and Respirsal that ought to be used to constitutionally bring those men to justice!!!

I have been waiting for a movie like this for quite some time but no one here seems creative enough to connect the dots Ron Paul style I guess...

If Michael Moore can put together a film to support Hillary Care - why cant we put together something to support Ron Paul Justice?
 
Although it's the obvious truth...the 9/11 Iraq thing is a tough thing to sell and bringing it up as a political figure pretty much throws a giant red 'Truther' stamp on your forehead.

I disagree. There are many many people who now understand that Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11, who are not conspiracy theorists. In fact, I would say the majority of Americans understand it. The debate is how to get out now, not should we have gone in. I wish Dr. Paul would have covered a little more on how he would maintain a strong national defense, and yet not have to engage in all out war against soveriegn nations that have not done us harm.
 
Well, I'm not saying it's wrong to bring it up. I agree with Dr. Paul, and think he SHOULD bring it up. Ignoring this truth is just going to get us into more mess going forward.

There are just people out there who are for some reason afraid to address this monumental failure of the current Republican admin.
 
Most Republican hawks understand Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11. We invaded pre-emptively to stop Saddam (for what was wrongly believed as a WMD threat).

Just because someone thinks we should stay in Iraq based on today's situation, doesn't mean they automatically believe Iraq had something to do with 9/11.

I happen to agree with Dr Paul that our presence hurts the situation and isn't worth American blood. There are honorable people that disagree.
 
Back
Top