Ron Paul laughs off Santorum's claims of Paul-Romney alliance

That comment from Romney's campaign guy about Ron Paul being the last person to cut a backroom deal is gold.
 
Here's a little something from another thread regarding why such an "alliance" even if it didn't violate so many of Pauls principals (which it does) still wouldn't be needed
This is why it is critical we make Ron's fundraising shine during the next few weeks.

The former Massachusetts governor announced Monday night that he had raised roughly $6.4 million in January. More significantly, however, he reported having only $7.7 million cash on hand -- which means that over the course of 31 days, his campaign spent approximately $18.7 million.

This is a remarkable burn rate for a campaign that appeared to be a well-oiled machine not too long ago. Each day in January, Romney spent an average of $603,225 and raised just $206,451, meaning he was spending $397,000 more than he was taking in. If the campaign continued to spend at that rate unabated, it would have burned through the remaining $7.7 million on Feb. 19.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/02/21/mitt-romney-fundraising_n_1291095.html
 
I won't guess at probabilities but I would adore Paul having more resources than Romney heading into/coming out of Super Tuesday.
And it's nice to know we're within striking distance of making it happen (now I have to figure out if there's any way I can donate even a few dollars more ;) )
 
pauln.png
[/URL] Uploaded with ImageShack.us[/IMG]
 
Back
Top