Ron Paul is more handsome than Mitt Romney

PRIEST

Member
Joined
Nov 21, 2007
Messages
327
I am a straight man and secure enough in my manhood to suggest that Ron Paul is the better looking of the two.

Superficially, at first, I can understand how people think that Mitt is more handsome. I believe this is due to conditioning.

I feel a deep, radiating light from the Good Doctor and upon inspection of this aura I see now that, even superficially, Paul's facial features are better shaped. Mitt has these flat low eyebrows that go right into his eyes and overall he emanates the vibe of a sweaty swindler. Ron's eyes speak of a true believer and his nose, especially from the side, represents honesty and solidarity to me.

I predict that as the primaries go on, women will warm up to the Good Doctor and begin to see his inner and outer beauty.
 
Not commenting on attractiveness but Ron looks like an iconic figure with the way his face is shaped and how his nose bows out. I'm somehow always reminded of the V for Vendetta mask (in a positive way) looking at his visage.
 
Romney is the stereotypical plastic politician with "great" hair, the Doctor atleast looks real
 
214358.jpg


A man doesn't get better looking that this.
 
My girlfriend says that Mitt has "beady eyes". I don't know what this means other than she doesn't trust him.
 
I am *seriously* loving the sweater under the suit-jacket look!
I was looking for the right thread to share this feeling, and this thread seems appropriate.
I mean *seriously* -phone the campaign- spot on!
 
Romney is tall, statuesque and looks like he came out of central casting. Ron can't compare with him on looks. Ron's message is golden however.
 
A friend: Female, somewhere between 16 and 60, said that she felt attracted to Ron because he seemed like a father figure. Handsome does not equate. Attractiveness does.
 
there is nothing more beautiful than the light of truth



with the possible exception of Kate Upton
 
Romney looks like the stereotypical plastic caricature of a politician... I don't see how people take him seriously. I think that women in general just do not follow politics as closely as men (just look at the gender make up of these forums).
 
No doubt that Dr Paul's good looks are partially based on his fantastic personality, beauty is only skin deep....... but ugly goes straight to the bone!
Romney does not strike me as handsome at all. Perry more so than Romney. I think Huntsman is better looking than Romney and Huntsman isn't my cup of tea either!
Dr Paul is just the full package!
He is all that AND a bag of chips! :)
 
Back
Top