Ron Paul Interview On Fox News Sunday: Talks Fema, Libya, Mises & More

Whoa! Paul knocked it out of the park with that one! I am beaming this morning.

Also, Chris Wallace was actually being respectful and asking decent questions. Not the condescending manner that I have come to expect from him and some of his cronies. What is going on?
 
Really good interview, when are Americans going to connect the dots that Dr Paul is the one who started all this deficit talk that everyone is preaching now and there just trying to steal his thunder? If he is shaping the republican party shouldn't they just go right to the source?
 
I've watched a lot of his recent interviews and I do wish he wasn't so long-winded in all his answers, every time. It would be fine to be long-winded on most answers if just every once in a while he'd answer a question with a sentence or two. Change it up, you see. Keep the pace lively and interesting. It's annoying when every interviewer every time has to cut him off to ask the next question. As the viewer, you start to feel like "wow, this guy would just talk for the whole 20 minutes on this one question if they let him".

Excellent candidates for short answers would be topics not central to his campaign and message, for instance the first question on FEMA. Or even topics that are central, sometimes a short answer can be powerful because it's so startling to hear a politician be so direct (e.g. "Would you end the IRS?" "Immediately!"; "What would be your strategy for ending the war in Iraq?" "Just come home. We just marched in we can just come home.")
 
Email Chris Wallace Your Thanks!

Email your comments, thanks, appreciation, etc. to Fox News Sunday. We want to let these people know that their ratings go up when Ron Paul is on air and when Ron Paul is taken seriously and treated respectfully.

Here's the Fox News Sunday with Chris Wallace email address: [email protected]
 
It seems like there are a lot of people who didn't get to see the interview being televised. A lot of areas in the Northeast were exclusively covering Irene. That's a lot of viewership missing a fabulous interview.
 
I've watched a lot of his recent interviews and I do wish he wasn't so long-winded in all his answers, every time. It would be fine to be long-winded on most answers if just every once in a while he'd answer a question with a sentence or two. Change it up, you see. Keep the pace lively and interesting. It's annoying when every interviewer every time has to cut him off to ask the next question. As the viewer, you start to feel like "wow, this guy would just talk for the whole 20 minutes on this one question if they let him".

Excellent candidates for short answers would be topics not central to his campaign and message, for instance the first question on FEMA. Or even topics that are central, sometimes a short answer can be powerful because it's so startling to hear a politician be so direct (e.g. "Would you end the IRS?" "Immediately!"; "What would be your strategy for ending the war in Iraq?" "Just come home. We just marched in we can just come home.")
No you are wrong. These are the questions where he was asked to clarify. He used to give direct answers on these subjects and he got a lot of flak.
 
I've watched a lot of his recent interviews and I do wish he wasn't so long-winded in all his answers, every time. It would be fine to be long-winded on most answers if just every once in a while he'd answer a question with a sentence or two. Change it up, you see. Keep the pace lively and interesting. It's annoying when every interviewer every time has to cut him off to ask the next question. As the viewer, you start to feel like "wow, this guy would just talk for the whole 20 minutes on this one question if they let him".

Excellent candidates for short answers would be topics not central to his campaign and message, for instance the first question on FEMA. Or even topics that are central, sometimes a short answer can be powerful because it's so startling to hear a politician be so direct (e.g. "Would you end the IRS?" "Immediately!"; "What would be your strategy for ending the war in Iraq?" "Just come home. We just marched in we can just come home.")
No you are wrong. These are the questions where he was asked to clarify. He used to give direct answers on these subjects and he got a lot of flak.
 
When's the last time a presidential candidate was asked to explain a school of economic philosophy on a Sunday-morning talk show?

Anybody?

Bueller?


Dr. Paul's teachin' school!!!

:D
 
Wow! I believe that this is THE best interview I have ever seen Ron do. He really did a great job on every topic and got so many good points in (i.e. on FEMA, his military donations, his military service, Libya/Iraq consequences, Austrian economics etc.) Great work Dr. Paul!
 
Last edited:
Back
Top