Ron Paul: I will not vote for Trump, he can give two positions in one speech (flashback)

[euphemia]

By the time the next election rolls around, I have a feeling Ron is going to have a tough decision to make. Especially if trump is finally afforded the opportunity to bring some troops home.

This ^^^^^

 

[euphemia]

Given the lackluster candidates the Libertarians keep putting on ballots.....

 

[acptulsa]

Just in case anyone wants to stop projecting long enough to look to Ron Paul for a clue as to what Ron Paul might do.

 

[dannno]

Why would Ron Paul endorse a warmonger and satanic pedophile like Romney?!? What does that have to do with Trump? Did you ever notice that Romney hates Trump?

 

[acptulsa]

Why would Ron Paul endorse a warmonger and satanic pedophile like Romney?!? What does that have to do with Trump? Did you ever notice that Romney hates Trump?

You expect us to numb our brains with hours of Molyneaux, but you can't make it to the third or fourth of a set of 1-10 minute videos?

 

[Swordsmyth]

Just in case anyone wants to stop projecting long enough to look to Ron Paul for a clue as to what Ron Paul might do.

What Ron WOULD do is tell people to think for themselves instead of trying to get them to do as he said.

 

[Swordsmyth]

Ron DID NOT endorse Tulsi.
He said she was the best of the Dems.

 

[dannno]

You expect us to numb our brains with hours of Molyneaux, but you can't make it to the third or fourth of a set of 1-10 minute videos?

Hmm, ok, let's see...

a. Ron Paul isn't running against Trump

b. Trump supports ending the wars and auditing the fed AND ultimately supports cutting spending. Romney supported none of those things.

c. Rand endorsed Romney for political reasons because he was a Senator. Rand wouldn't have endorsed him if he wasn't becoming a player in the political establishment.

 

[acptulsa]

Ron DID NOT endorse Tulsi.
He said she was the best of the Dems.

I didn't title the video, anyone who can vote in a Democratic primary may well consider that an endorsement, and since even if she wins, superdelegates will steal the nomination from her, it doesn't matter.

As a sign of the likelihood of the man endorsing Trump, though, it's instructive to those with ears to hear.

Hmm, ok, let's see...

a. Ron Paul isn't running against Trump

b. Trump supports ending the wars and auditing the fed AND ultimately supports cutting spending. Romney supported none of those things.

c. Rand endorsed Romney for political reasons because he was a Senator. Rand wouldn't have endorsed him if he wasn't becoming a player in the political establishment.

d. Ron Paul hasn't endorsed the GOP candidate for president at any point in the twenty-first century.

e. 2016 occurred in the twenty-first century.

 

[Swordsmyth]

I didn't title the video, anyone who can vote in a Democratic primary may well consider that an endorsement, and since even if she wins, superdelegates will steal the nomination from her, it doesn't matter.

As a sign of the likelihood of the man endorsing Trump, though, it's instructive to those with ears to hear.



d. Ron Paul hasn't endorsed the GOP candidate for president at any point in the twenty-first century.

e. 2016 occurred in the twenty-first century.

He's 100 times more likely to endorse Trump than Tulsi.

 

[dannno]

d. Ron Paul hasn't endorsed the GOP candidate for president at any point in the twenty-first century.

e. 2016 occurred in the twenty-first century.

Every President has been controlled by the deep state cabal for the last 100 years or so at least with the exception of Kennedy. And with the exception of Trump. Trump is somewhat controlled, he can't do whatever he wants yet, but he is their stated enemy and Ron Paul knows that. That is something you are completely lack awareness about for whatever reason you choose. I don't know if you work for the cabal wittingly or unwittingly.

However, Ron Paul is going to have a tough decision to make.

 

[acptulsa]

He's 100 times more likely to endorse Trump than Tulsi.

As far as the general election goes, that's telling in itself, since Trump is 1,000,000 times more likely to get his party's nomination.

That said, as far as people who can vote in Democrat primaries are concerned, he has endorsed Gabbard.

He has never endorsed Trump.

What does your New Math Projection Machine say about that?

Every President has been controlled by the deep state cabal for the last 100 years or so at least with the exception of Kennedy. And with the exception of Trump. Trump is somewhat controlled, he can't do whatever he wants yet, but he is their stated enemy and Ron Paul knows that. That is something you are completely lack awareness about for whatever reason you choose. I don't know if you work for the cabal wittingly or unwittingly.

However, Ron Paul is going to have a tough decision to make.

I resent your insinuations about Calvin Coolidge.

I don't believe your blanket statements about Ron Paul.

And you don't even seem to know if you work for the cabal willingly and unwittingly.

 

[Swordsmyth]

As far as the general election goes, that's telling in itself, since Trump is 1,000,000 times more likely to get his party's nomination.

Head to head if she wins the nomination is what I meant.

That said, as far as people who can vote in Democrat primaries are concerned, he has endorsed Gabbard.

He has never endorsed Trump.

What does your New Math Projection Machine say about that?
He has NOT endorsed her in any sense of the word.
Saying she is lesser of many evils is NOT an endorsement and no amount of twisting on your part can make it one.

 

[acptulsa]

Head to head if she wins the nomination is what I meant.

Beyond academic. The subject will never come up.

He has never endorsed Trump.

What does your New Math Projection Machine say about that?
He has NOT endorsed her in any sense of the word.
Saying she is lesser of many evils is NOT an endorsement and no amount of twisting on your part can make it one.

Care to put money on Ron Paul endorsing Trump?

Does the phrase, "Put up or shut up" mean anything to you?

 

[CCTelander]

Beyond academic. The subject will never come up.



Care to put money on Ron Paul endorsing Trump?

Does the phrase, "Put up or shut up" mean anything to you?

Most likely he'll do neither. Just sayin'.

 

[Swordsmyth]

Beyond academic. The subject will never come up.



Care to put money on Ron Paul endorsing Trump?

Does the phrase, "Put up or shut up" mean anything to you?

I never said he was likely to, I have no idea whether he will.

And whether he does doesn't mean much.

We are not sheep who need him to tell us how to vote.

 

[acptulsa]

Most likely he'll do neither. Just sayin'.

Right again.

 

[Stratovarious]

''I will not vote for Trump, he can give two positions in one speech (flashback)''

A little perspective/contextual view on Ron's statement from 2016;

Ron Paul's son was running for Office, Ron made a couple of statements that I considered out of character,
and felt that the fact that his son was also a candidate influenced/tainted those statements.

 

[jmdrake]

Maybe we should find out what Ron thinks now that Trump has a record of actual actions instead of just words.
Maybe we should think for ourselves.

You mean like banning a gun accessory by executive order? Or how about the new "thought crime" initiative by William Barr? Or the face scanning cameras at the airports and at the border? Or sending weapons and troops to Saudi Arabia after the Saudis literally butchered a journalist? Lots of "actual actions" to dislike.

 

[PAF]

What Ron WOULD do is tell people to think for themselves instead of trying to get them to do as he said.

He's 100 times more likely to endorse Trump than Tulsi.

Ron would do what he is doing now, which trump and 99% of the politicians will never do. Ron would tell us that we do not need trillion dollar omnibus, take guns first due process later, that we need to protect oil, or that a wall is essential to liberty.

trump can say and do what he wants, but as long as people are led by the nose via trump, msm, common core, political flip-flops, deep state or whatever you term it these days, etc., the people will never know the truth.

Most people, most voters, are too busy with their daily lives trying to get ahead in this world. Most people rely and count on politicians to make the best decisions for them, which is the very reason we are in this stinking mess.

Voices like Ron, mine, Larken, Walter Block, Kokesh and others, who take the time to explain through words AND action, that we do not need politicians and govt. organized crime, are essential if humans are ever to wake up to the ideas of freedom, liberty and fiscal responsibility. YOUR way, like trump's, just perpetuates what has caused this very mess to begin with. You, sir, are an excellent advertiser and endorser of the 2-party slave-owners.

BTW, trump NEVER talks about, even in a round about way, the root problems of why we are in this mess. Certainly NOT when he signs Omnibus, "emergency" spending bills, talks about raise the age to 21 and a host of other idiotic things contrary not only to libertarians and republicans, but human beings as a whole.

King. Vote. republican versus democrat. Hoorah!