Ron Paul endorses Chuck

[orafi]

http://www.lewrockwell.com/blog/lewrw/archives/023001.html

 

[Charles Wilson]

http://www.lewrockwell.com/blog/lewrw/archives/023001.html

Excellent choice! Me too

 

[CptnRsk]

Ron Paul Endorsement

Im game. Someone put something together that will capture the highlights of Chuck, and my family and I will pass them out. The McCain Palin signs are going up big time here and I think its simply because they are all looking for the lesser of two evils as programmed.

We need a campaign that opens peoples minds and gets them to start thinking critical for themselves again.

God Bless

 

[robo1415]

I'm voting for Chuck too!My Barr bumpersticker has come off!

Now that Ron has officially endorsed someone,it is time to act!

 

[1836]

DAMN. Not that I disagree with Chuck Baldwin on most issues, and I think this is good because the CP may be more worthwhile than the LP.

Unfortunately...

Baldwin is a 9/11 Truther. Whatever your stance on that, you have to admit that if we tie the 9/11 Truth stuff into the public's perception of the CFL and the greater liberty movement, the movement will die a slow, painful death and be relegated to mediocrity.

 

[Slist]

The McCain Palin signs are going up big time here and I think its simply because they are all looking for the lesser of two evils as programmed.

We need a campaign that opens peoples minds and gets them to start thinking critical for themselves again.

I could NOT agree more. If all those ron paul signs would become something with a catchy slogan like "Voting for the lesser of two evils is still voting for evil." or something provocatory like "If you do not know McKinney, Barr, Baldwin ect you don't deserve to vote"..

I don't know.. something to let everyone voting for obama or McCain feel like uninformed sheep

 

[jclay2]

Baldwin is a 9/11 Truther. Whatever your stance on that, you have to admit that if we tie the 9/11 Truth stuff into the public's perception of the CFL and the greater liberty movement, the movement will die a slow, painful death and be relegated to mediocrity.

Evidence? I am not saying you are wrong, that would just really bum me out.

 

[Imperial]

I am disappointed if this is the original source of the endorsement, which I have been looking for for some time. It verifies what depresses me.

Ron Paul should not have endorsed someone after his 3rd Party conference. It is a major flip. And, I admired his refusal to attack others, while this seems highly critical of Barr while ignoring the press releases the Barr campaign put out after the snub.

Which doesn't mean I agree with Barr; however, it does seem like Paul's vengeance. Which shows how pissed Paul is, but doesn't show the qualities that first brought me to Paul.

 

[ronpaulitician]

I thought Paul wasn't gonna tell us who to vote for?

Major disappointment for me (and am not gonna vote Baldwin).

 

[VRP08]

Ron Paul Endorses Constitution Party Candidate ?

http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2008/...n-paul-endorses-constitution-party-candidate/

 

[VRP08]

Their site http://www.constitutionparty.com/party_platform.php

The Constitution Party gratefully acknowledges the blessing of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ as Creator, Preserver and Ruler of the Universe and of these United States. We hereby appeal to Him for mercy, aid, comfort, guidance and the protection of His Providence as we work to restore and preserve these United States.

This great nation was founded, not by religionists, but by Christians; not on religions but on the Gospel of Jesus Christ. For this very reason peoples of other faiths have been and are afforded asylum, prosperity, and freedom of worship here.

The goal of the Constitution Party is to restore American jurisprudence to its Biblical foundations and to limit the federal government to its Constitutional boundaries.

 

[majinkoola]

Take a look at the Republican party platform. That means Ron Paul must be an interventionist, right?

 

[JosephTheLibertarian]

ew. The Constitution Party's message is uber-disguisting

 

[RonPaulVolunteer]

If any of you actually understood those words, from a true-Gospel standpoint instead of the stereotypical "American Christianity" standpoint, you wouldn't think bad of any of it.

 

[mport1]

ew. The Constitution Party's message is uber-disguisting

+1

 

[JosephTheLibertarian]

If any of you actually understood those words, from a true-Gospel standpoint instead of the stereotypical "American Christianity" standpoint, you wouldn't think bad of any of it.

Why are you so loyal to the party? lol.

 

[Razorback Fan]

If any of you actually understood those words, from a true-Gospel standpoint instead of the stereotypical "American Christianity" standpoint, you wouldn't think bad of any of it.

Screw your Gospel and shove your Christian America where the sun doesn't shine.

Would I still be allowed to say that in the Constitution Party's America?

 

[honortruth]

I will be supporting Baldwin/Castle of the CP - even though I do not agree with every issue (Religion) I agree with him especially on the fact Baldwin supports re-investigation of Sepember 11, 2001 (this is a MUST in my opinion)

Paul chose well, since the Libertarian ticket was won by Barr (Gravel should have won the ticket).

If Baldwin is not on the ballet - my vote goes to the GP.

 

[intelliot]

GP?


How about doing something like this for Chuck Baldwin:
http://letourcongresstweet.org/

 

[Kade]

GP?


How about doing something like this for Chuck Baldwin:
http://letourcongresstweet.org/

Goat Porn. There's been a lot of here on the forums lately.