Ron Paul endorses Chuck Baldwin so now we know who to get behind

[ARealConservative]

Your just mad he didn;t endorse Barr. We all know you have been pushing Barr here. News flash BARR is done Bladwin is in.

Barr is done?

He will receive 10 times the votes of Baldwin but they are both "done" by any objective definition of the word.

 

[ARealConservative]

Ron Paul can support Chuck Baldwin, and I have no problem with that. I hope Baldwin does well. I will continue to support Bob Barr, however. While I applaud Paul for putting Barr in his place, their problems are not real issues. I proudly voted for Ron Paul in the Ohio primary, and would do so again had he won the nomination, but I will be voting Libertarian in November.

This is my take as well.

I still have tremendous respect for Paul, but that he has chosen to engage in a personality battle is a hit against him.

 

[apc3161]

You are an idiot. He is protecting american jobs moron which is what should be done. He is 100% free trade

JACKASS

I'm sorry. He is supportive of across the board tariffs, yet you claim that he is in favor of free trade. What is your definition of free trade?

 

[ARealConservative]

I'm sorry. He is supportive of across the board tariffs, yet you claim that he is in favor of free trade. What is your definition of free trade?

free as in managed by central planners.

 

[rajibo]

You are an idiot. He is protecting american jobs moron which is what should be done. He is 100% free trade

JACKASS

That's not nice.

 

[TastyWheat]

I don't have any problem with Chuck Baldwin, I have a problem with his party. Same thing (in reverse) for Bob Barr.

 

[JosephTheLibertarian]

http://reason.com/blog/show/128950.html

Ok folks it is time to fund him let's do it now! Money bomb Friday the 26th www.buckforchuck.com

www.baldwin2008.com

www.buckforchuck.com

Unable to think for yourself? You've been a protectionist Baldwin shill for weeks now, who are you fooling? liar

 

[mport1]

You are an idiot. He is protecting american jobs moron which is what should be done. He is 100% free trade

JACKASS

You do not understand what free trade is.

 

[Highland]

http://www.highlandmediaworks.com/ronpaulad/


you will see here how much CB loves RP!!! he is cool guys!

 

[Young_Apprentice]

Neither will I, that's why I am voting for Chuck Baldwin.

If he's ok for Ron Paul, he's ok for me.

I found this here Ron Paul guy. He sure thinks well. I think I'll follow him mindlessly.

 

[speciallyblend]

I don't have any problem with Chuck Baldwin, I have a problem with his party. Same thing (in reverse) for Bob Barr.

we are in the sameboat

 

[JosephTheLibertarian]

we are in the sameboat

Is that why you're voting for Obama? You support the Democratic Party agenda and you support Obama's policy positions?

 

[LibertyEagle]

I don't have any problem with Chuck Baldwin, I have a problem with his party. Same thing (in reverse) for Bob Barr.

Well, it's a good thing then, that we don't elect a political party to office. We elect an individual.

 

[Feelgood]

Sorry but RP did not "endorse" Chuck Baldwin.

So for me, there will be...

No buck for Chuck...

No cluck for Chuck...

No fuck for Chuck...

No Norris for Chuck...

Maybe some upchuck for Chuck...

IMO at this point, I think I may just simply stay home on election night. I'm just so sick and disappointed with the whole damn thing. Diebold will be the only victor regardless.

 

[JosephTheLibertarian]

Well, it's a good thing then, that we don't elect a political party to office. We elect an individual.

Yeah, keep thinking that party doesn't matter. Don't get your hopes up come November

 

[Bman]

You obviously have not heard him at all because he is far from any theocrat.


www.buckforchuck.com

Spoken like a true Christian. If you don't want to listen to us non-christian members in the liberty movement that's your business. Chuck may be Pauls personal choice. Maybe he doesn't come accross as a theocrat to a christian, but he has a real long way to go with those of us who are not god fearing.

Hey, I certainly welcome him trying. But it would be like a camel trying to fit through a needles eye. BTW a needles eye is actually the late night entrance that was used in fortifications, during biblical times, to allow people into the complex individually at night when the main gates were closed. So I'm not saying it is impossible, just not likely.

 

[Josh_LA]

Thank Barr and his hardasses for pushing it!

 

[Brassmouth]

I will not support a theocrat. Period. Chuck Baldwin may have his heart in the right places, but his positions and he rants on illegal immigration and gay marriage is just ridiculous.

I agree. I am a true libertarian. Baldwin is not. If Barr hadn't "betrayed us," as so many of you claim, Baldwin wouldn't be nearly as popular. (Not that he's popular in any meaningful sense anyway)

 

[alaric]

Neither will I, that's why I am voting for Chuck Baldwin.

If he's ok for Ron Paul, he's ok for me.

well said! We were all hoping Ron would support one person, now he has. Go Chuck!

 

[idiom]

A flat tariff to replace income tax is a lot looser than import quotas and zillion page trade agreements.

Now you can bring in or out as much of anything as you want with no market biasing oversight. Just a border tax.