Ron Paul - Debate Highlights Video (Youtube)

I thought he did well.

The seriousness of his tone demands attention, and I can see why it might turn some people off.

We're at a crossroads though, listen to Dr. Paul or continue to let the band play on. You can only rearrange the chairs on the deck so many times.
 
I think he did great. During the debate, it didn't seem that great because his sincere message was squeezed between so many imitations, BUT, all that matters are the sound bites. Why? Because less than 0.5% of voters saw or will ever see then entire debate. All they will see--if anything-- are short, 15-25 second clips. And Ron Paul's highlights are just as good as they've always been.
 
I'm much less angry having only watched his clips so for today I'll leave it at that.

Enemies domestic, just awesome.
 
Here is the download link for the entire debate:

http://www.megaupload.com/?d=OCZHFXWP

346MB

paulay7.jpg
 
Dr. Paul did extremely well as usual! Don't let the MSM interpret his performance.
 
I really liked the part where the lady said something like " you are going to bring big change to the government." Is she saying the rest of the candidates are going to bring nearly no change? it sure sounded like it. My grandfather is refusing to vote because he said he is tired of being lied to by politicions who promise some much and really don't do anything to change it (for the good anyways).
 
Giuliani insults girlfriend??

MS. WASHBURN: So this next set of questions is entirely about character and leadership.
Mayor Giuliani, your administration in New York has been accused of handling your security expenses in a way that obscured public disclosure. What specifically will you promise to do to ensure that a Giuliani White House is open with information that might be inconvenient to explain to the public?

MR. GIULIANI: The reality is that all that information --

MS. WASHBURN: Thirty seconds, please.

MR. GIULIANI: The reality is that all that information was available and known to people, known six years ago. And I would make sure that government was transparent. My government in New York City was so transparent that they knew every single thing I did almost every time I did it. (Chuckles.) So I would be extremely -- (laughter) -- I would be extremely open.

I'm used to it. I'm used to being analyzed. I haven't had a perfect life. I wish I had. And I do the best that I can to learn from my mistakes. But as far as, you know, open, transparent government, I think I've had both an open, transparent government and an open, transparent life, and it allows you to lead, then, with honesty and truth.


So his mistress was a mistake?:D

At least his hiding the expenses among various obscure accounts for "transparency", of course, must have been a mistake. :D
 
Ron Paul has given much better answers in the past about getting through congress...that a Ron Paul presidency would indicate a mandate from the people that congress had better fall in line, or the incumbent won't be winning another term...

This is exactly what I'm talking about when I say Ron Paul "skips every other word" when he speaks. The answer he gave basically DID say the above, but it was totally unclear, like he expects the uninitiated viewer to fill in the blanks.
 
Back
Top