Ron Paul Compared To Tulsi Gabbard With Media Reaction

forum chatter....

there are some other points of concern for me
her support for Israel and, not long ago, the way she defended CIA torture program.

we should not forget -

Trump has duped half of America and flooded White House with all kinds of zionist-neocon criminals and warmongers.

who can forget Bush's campaign was anti-war as he pretended to be some kind of peace maker.



As Putin said - US presidents are just puppets. Actually, I think it needs much different strategy to really kick out all the globalist motherfuckers and take the country from their grip. The candidate should pretend that he's one of them, during campaig more ore less support their agendas and, only after the victory, round all the traitors and criminals up and put them to jails. Similary it was done in Russia and it worked well. Putin was nominated by a group of pepole known as "Kremlin Family". They were oligarchs, globalists, they supported thievery and western attempts to balkanize Russian Federation. Berezovsky's ORT TV even runt election campaign for Putin and Berezovsky himself was MP of Putin's party. Immediately after his victory Putin changed Russian constitution and started to hunt down all the thieves and traitors.


teleSUR English
BREAKING | President DonaldTrump will sign a border security bill to avert another government shutdown, but also declare a national emergency to obtain funds for his promised U.S.-Mexico border wall.
https://bit.ly/2UTdxua

But, but...Mexico will pay for it he said....

Serious question: what else he can do during "a national emergency" with his neocon-zionist cronies...

3700336097.gif
 
Last edited:
Tulsi Gabbard‏@TulsiGabbard · 13 min.
I’m running for President to end our regime change wars, work to end new Cold War, & walk us back from the abyss of nuclear war. We face greater risk of nuclear catastrophe now more than ever. I’m introducing a bill to stop Trump from scrapping INF treaty & sparking new arms race




https://twitter.com/israel_mid_ru/status/1095608994184523777
 
Last edited:
Tulsi Gabbard‏@TulsiGabbard · 13 min.
I’m running for President to end our regime change wars, work to end new Cold War, & walk us back from the abyss of nuclear war. We face greater risk of nuclear catastrophe now more than ever. I’m introducing a bill to stop Trump from scrapping INF treaty & sparking new arms race




https://twitter.com/israel_mid_ru/status/1095608994184523777
Treaties are not any of the House's business, the Senate and the President deal with them.
 
You're a Constitutionalist when it's convenient.
I'm a Constitutionalist when it is convenient for liberty.
I also advocate for a return to Constitutionality about everything when we have undone all of the damage, letting the enemy play without the rules while you play by them is stupid.
 
I'm a Constitutionalist when it is convenient for liberty.
I also advocate for a return to Constitutionality about everything when we have undone all of the damage, letting the enemy play without the rules while you play by them is stupid.


The constitution is not convenient for liberty. In fact, it opposes it. If all of the damage is somehow undone, returning to the constitution would put us right back to where we are now.

I am not suggesting that we don’t return to the constitution, but I am not suggesting that we do either.
 
The constitution is not convenient for liberty. In fact, it opposes it. If all of the damage is somehow undone, returning to the constitution would put us right back to where we are now.

I am not suggesting that we don’t return to the constitution, but I am not suggesting that we do either.

Which amendments don't you like? Is there anything about the first ten you don't like?
 
Which amendments don't you like? Is there anything about the first ten you don't like?

The first ten never addressed prosecution for those who violated them. They also left loopholes which gives power to the state. Had I been tasked in writing them they would have been written completely different.

The 2nd A didn’t spell it out enough, the 3rd didn’t go far enough, the 5th was flawed, the 9th was a flake amendment and the 10th like the 2nd.



 
The constitution is not convenient for liberty. In fact, it opposes it. If all of the damage is somehow undone, returning to the constitution would put us right back to where we are now.

I am not suggesting that we don’t return to the constitution, but I am not suggesting that we do either.
There are parts that are good for liberty that should be kept and parts that are bad for liberty that should be changed but when we have taken power and repaired most of the damage we will need to play by the rules to change the parts that need to change, playing by the rules is very important for liberty, we just can't afford to play by all of the rules while the enemies of liberty break them at their whim.
 
Back
Top