Paul/Huntsman 2012?
That's not the point. Someone needs to make a stand to this nonsense. Everything in the news these days can be defined by one word: sensationalism. I am sick of it and I commend the campaign on ending this garbage. Think about this for a second.
Greta invited Sarah Palin to give advice to the other Republican candidates on what they should do. This comes from the lady that left her office in middle of her term. This is the lady that lost her VP bid in 2008. Who is she to give advice to anyone?
Hannity has Sarah Palin on to discuss the GOP nomination on who is good and who isn't. Again, who is she to decide this?
The media outlets talk about Herman Cain more than they talk about the issues.
This has to end and I think the campaign is putting a line in the sand. Enough with this garbage. Donald Trump? Who the hell is he to become a moderator? What the hell has he done in the world of politics or journalism? Give me a break...
If it gets down to essentially be Newt vs Romney attending this debate, watch for Romney to drop because he doesn't want to go one-on-one with Newt.
I'm glad he dropped out. I really doubt Newt, Bachmann, Perry, or Romney will decline considering their recent pilgrimages to Trump Tower...
and Trump could hold resentment towards Ron now.
The debate will be a joke, but, I disagree that "the office of the president" should be held in any high regard. That's just some of the brainwashing we all learned in school.
Well, they could make this an all reality TV moderated debate.Let's see, they could invite the Kardashians, someone from the Real Housewives of Jersey whatever, and have them join the Donald at the moderator table.
Dr. Paul knocks it out of the park again!The Trump debate invitation looks like a kind of dignity test for the 2012 presidential field; so far Paul and Jon Huntsman are the only two candidates to state that they will not attend.
Who is supposed to be the star of this shindig? The moderator or the candidates? Ron called em out for the correct answer to that question.
Fact is: a "debate" shown online and on some satellite channel that most people that have it don't even know they have it? Dr. Paul not going effectively halves their audience, easily. He's the only real draw other than Trump and people watching for trump aren't watching to decide to vote in the caucus.
Anybody who thinks this was a mistake, take a look at how Politico summed it up. They're not known for being Paul supporters.
Dr. Paul knocks it out of the park again!