Ron needs to call a press conference and say...

Curlz, MOST Americans would be disgusted to hear that you had donated money to our campaign - in any fashion. Infact, Ron Paul himself would be disgusted... he is against entangling relationships, and certainly against FOREIGN (remember you are a FOREIGNER) intervention in our political system. Being a man of the constitution I'm sure he'd rather lose than win because of foreign support. This isn't about the world, this is about America. I hate it when people think because they are deeply entrenched in American culture that gives them a stake in the nation. You are and unless move to America will always be, a Foreigner. From people I speak to its in part all the foreigners loving Ron Paul that steers them away from him.

Like I said, your country is screwed up more than ours, go look after yourself and stop interfering. These things do not concern you.

P4J
 
Applause To the Australian!


Ditto that. We can't get AMERICANS to wake the f*** up and care and here we have a non-citizen foot soldier in another country working his arse off. That is to be commended, always. Thank you, sir. And you're right, what happens in the US affects the entire world. If WE are brought to our knees (we're already bending over) it is a sad sign of things to come for all.
 
Curlz, MOST Americans would be disgusted to hear that you had donated money to our campaign - in any fashion. Infact, Ron Paul himself would be disgusted... he is against entangling relationships, and certainly against FOREIGN (remember you are a FOREIGNER) intervention in our political system. Being a man of the constitution I'm sure he'd rather lose than win because of foreign support. This isn't about the world, this is about America. I hate it when people think because they are deeply entrenched in American culture that gives them a stake in the nation. You are and unless move to America will always be, a Foreigner. From people I speak to its in part all the foreigners loving Ron Paul that steers them away from him.

Like I said, your country is screwed up more than ours, go look after yourself and stop interfering. These things do not concern you.

P4J


You're full of crap Mr. 8 posts. Paul is all for individuals helping out others, just not using tax dollars. Freedom is popular everywhere. You are NOT a RP supporter imo otherwise you would understand the Australian's stake in this. We have an international forum for a reason, one you don't "get".
 
Curlz, MOST Americans would be disgusted to hear that you had donated money to our campaign - in any fashion. Infact, Ron Paul himself would be disgusted... he is against entangling relationships, and certainly against FOREIGN (remember you are a FOREIGNER) intervention in our political system. Being a man of the constitution I'm sure he'd rather lose than win because of foreign support. This isn't about the world, this is about America. I hate it when people think because they are deeply entrenched in American culture that gives them a stake in the nation. You are and unless move to America will always be, a Foreigner. From people I speak to its in part all the foreigners loving Ron Paul that steers them away from him.

Like I said, your country is screwed up more than ours, go look after yourself and stop interfering. These things do not concern you.

P4J

Yay, irrational bigotry!

It's all them dammed furrners, fault, right?

By the way, there's nothing in the Constitution about foreign citizens taking part in the political discourse.
 
Let me remind any Americans here that what we are fighting is Globalization. To defeat such we have decided it is necessary to have an international forum. The hypocrisy is ripe here. The CFR and NAU (world government) people must be laughing their asses off to watch a bunch of "constitutionalists" run around on the internet with foreigners.

P4J
 
For the record, I current see low payback for starting a new party but if you are you've got to appeal to the mainstream as much as possible- my thought on a name: The Reagan Conservative Party
 
Too bad the Constitution Party name is already taken by a party that does not actually stand for the constitution (according to wikipedia they want government control of pornography and other things).

Maybe we could take over that party. It would be easier than the GOP. :D
 
I do kind of like the idea of a "new party", however, should a legitimitate option arise for a new party, how can we make sure we don't end up w/ poor support ala all other 3rd parties? The current laws still work against them. How do we prevent that from happening?

Unfortunately, the best way for a third party to gain any sort of traction would be to not run a presidential candidate. A new third party would (and should) work on getting people into state legislative positions and perhaps a few people into congress. It would want to maintain favorable relations with republicans while still taking issue with the national GOP, so therefore in areas where you have close races between dems and reps you would only want to give out public endorsements and not run a candidate and potentially cost the republican the position, but in places like Paul's congressional district where the democrats have stopped fielding opposition the third party could provide principled opposition.

The state legislators would then be charged with fixing ballot access laws and other two party preferential statutes. Given a few years with positive results on the state level, then you might have a chance on a presidential election.
 
For the record, I current see low payback for starting a new party but if you are you've got to appeal to the mainstream as much as possible- my thought on a name: The Reagan Conservative Party

I like it.

Unfortunetly, as Ron has said, Reagan was a failure. He couldn't practice what he preached. Ron is 1000x the man Reagan was.

But I understand using it for the brain-dead, superficial, conservative appeal.
 
Back
Top