Ron is TAKING OFF on Google Trends...

[wgadget]

Internet-wise. The MSM is trying to keep him down.

http://www.google.com/trends?q=ron+paul,+mitt+romney,+newt+gingrich&ctab=0&geo=all&date=mtd&sort=0

 

[coastie]

Yeah, was at #6 a few minutes ago...

 

[eleganz]

yessssss...!!!!!!!

 

[Epic]

In Iowa, he is the only one to garner measurable support/queries:

http://www.google.com/trends?q=ron+...ich&ctab=0&geo=us&geor=usa.ia&date=mtd&sort=0

 

[mport1]

Nice, I like the trajectory of that graph.

 

[specialkornflake]

This more accurately shows the competition:
http://www.google.com/trends?q=ron+paul%2C+romney%2C+gingrich&ctab=0&geo=all&date=mtd&sort=0

 

[wgadget]

This more accurately shows the competition:
http://www.google.com/trends?q=ron+paul%2C+romney%2C+gingrich&ctab=0&geo=all&date=mtd&sort=0

LOL..The bottom graph is truly despicable, I must say.

 

[hazek]

@ ron paul @ mitt romney @ newt gingrich

 

[iGGz]

Drudge just linked to the money bomb via Daily Paul

 

[Barrex]

It shows how strong power MSM is in most of the cases......When they boost some candidate coverage google search for that candidate goes up accordingly........


http://www.google.com/trends?q=ron+...chmann&ctab=0&geo=us&geor=all&date=ytd&sort=0

This shows you that MSM candidates will overtake Ron in google searches when elections start because of media coverage....just like they did last time.....There is lim chance that after Ron wins Iowa they will start reporting about him more and fairly but that is wishfull thinking..... Some people said: after this straw poll they will not be able to ignore him, and then Now after this straw poll, after this moneybomb they will have no other choice etc....I dont see reason why would media change after Iowa elections. I hope that I am wrong.

 

[wgadget]

Does vitriolic venom from Ron's political enemies (Dick Morris, Hannity, etc) count?

If so, he should see a rise.

 

[mport1]

I dont see reason why would media change after Iowa elections. I hope that I am wrong.

I'm pretty sure they won't change. I just hope it becomes that more transparent to people what they are doing.

 

[InTradePro]

These would be a better comparision.

http://www.google.com/trends?q=ron+paul,+romney,+gingrich&ctab=0&geo=us&date=mtd&sort=0

http://www.google.com/trends?q=ron+paul,+romney,+gingrich&ctab=0&geo=us&geor=usa.ia&date=mtd&sort=0

 

[helmuth_hubener]

I dont see reason why would media change after Iowa elections. I hope that I am wrong.

Winning Iowa will change things. It will radically change things. The media, more than being a vast evil conspiracy (or at least in addition to being that), reports the news. The results of the Iowa caucuses is news. They're not going to just ignore it; that's a totally unrealistic and paranoid expectation. They'll spin it, sure. They spin everything. But they will cover it. And it will change the entire race. Once Ron Paul wins Iowa, Ron Paul can win the nomination.

 

[hazek]

These would be a better comparision.

http://www.google.com/trends?q=ron+paul,+romney,+gingrich&ctab=0&geo=us&date=mtd&sort=0

http://www.google.com/trends?q=ron+paul,+romney,+gingrich&ctab=0&geo=us&geor=usa.ia&date=mtd&sort=0

You are most likely right..

Btw here's a comparison to the last time at this stage:
ron paul romney huckabee mccain

http://www.google.com/trends?q=ron+...in&ctab=0&geo=us&geor=all&date=2007-12&sort=0

 

[wgadget]

Interesting..Both then and now it's clear that ANYONE BUT PAUL was the modus operandi of the mainstream news outlets. So sad for them.

 

[Barrex]

I'm pretty sure they won't change. I just hope it becomes that more transparent to people what they are doing.

From my expirience it want happen. There is direct correlation between MSM=Google Trends= Votes. MSM gives publicity= Internet amplifies that publicity= wich is transfered in VOTES. Ron Paul is anomaly in this equation because his publicity comes from his supporters (and media in some percentage). When elections start it will be interesting to see if his supporters are going to be able to generate enough publicity to reach and "convert" voters....It will be really interesting to see percentage of MSM coverage after Iowa elections....

“What looks to us like bitter trials are often blessings in disguise”(translated back to english) O.W

 

[Barrex]

Winning Iowa will change things. It will radically change things. The media, more than being a vast evil conspiracy (or at least in addition to being that), reports the news. The results of the Iowa caucuses is news. They're not going to just ignore it; that's a totally unrealistic and paranoid expectation. They'll spin it, sure. They spin everything. But they will cover it. And it will change the entire race. Once Ron Paul wins Iowa, Ron Paul can win the nomination.

Dude I am not paranoid and I dont take your remark personal....If you read my post you will see I wrote "start reporting about him more and fairly". See. If they spin it like you wrote then it is not fair coverage. They are allready saying "fluke" and preparing to minimize role of Iowa with "Iowa discredited" etc.

 

[wgadget]

Gosh, it's gonna be a national shocker when, after Iowa is discredited, we find out that NH is as well.

 

[ronpaulfollower999]

Gosh, it's gonna be a national shocker when, after Iowa is discredited, we find out that NH is as well.

Its gonna really suck when the presidency is irrelevant.