Ron beats the IRS

just thought of something else to nail them on in that argument.


if the $50 gold coin isnt worth 50 but $850 (or gold ounce at whatever time), based on their argument that its worth the amount of metal the coin is made of.....then why does the IRS get to claim that a $1 or a $100 FRN is worth $1 or $100??? Shouldnt it also be held to the same standard of comparison or argument??

In other words if they claim the $50 gold coin is worth what the metal in it is worth and not what is printed on it for taxation, then why cant we all claim that their FRN is also worth only what the paper is worth that it is made from vs the amount printed on it?

See what i mean? They want to hold one currency to a totally different set of rules vs their own.

So is it face value or material value? Either way, the FRN notes loose if held equal because atleast a $50 gold coin has more gold weight in it vs a $1 gold coin if there was one, where as a $50 FRN is just the same exact paper as a $1 FRN or a $1000 FRN....its just paper vs gold.
 
Seen that story before - never saw the outcome of the case till now - awesome.

But there is a problem I see with this. How long do you think it will be till someone thinks to sue him for not meeting minimum wage requirements?
 
Back
Top