Romney is Watching Us

[AuH20]

yes, he is trying to build an alliance to go up against the Israeli lobby, and neocon interests. If he can get Mitt to help him in '16 that will be huge for him going up against the most powerful wing of the GOP, the neocon wing. If Mitt wins then atleast he will be on his good side and maybe he can get some leg. passed.

Correct. Hes trying to insulate himself for the coming backlash that comes with the Paul name. You saw a glimpse of this during the Kentucky primary. Rand will need Romney Co.'s bundlers to fight back against the massive smear campaign.

 

[paulbot24]

yes, he is trying to build an alliance to go up against the Israeli lobby, and neocon interests. If he can get Mitt to help him in '16 that will be huge for him going up against the most powerful wing of the GOP, the neocon wing. If Mitt wins then atleast he will be on his good side and maybe he can get some leg. passed.

Isn't the Israeli lobby and the neocon wing essentially the same thing....?

 

[trey4sports]

Isn't the Israeli lobby and the neocon wing essentially the same thing....?

i singled them out because they are probably the most influential part of the Neocon wing of the party but i'm sure there are other groups that are also serving the neoconservative agenda.

 

[anaconda]

Rand is cozying up to the Romney/Mormon money side to prepare for his inevitable battle with the Neocons. Bill Kristol, Cheney, the Bushes and like.

Are you saying Romney is in the Brzezinski camp? Either way the military industrial complex is happy I would think.

 

[RickyJ]

I doubt the loser is watching us, but if he is I want to remind him that we will soon be taking over and will prosecute traitors like him. The party will be over soon Romney, enjoy it while you can loser.

 

[paulbot24]

He's probably fapping to the comments at hxxp://www.mittromneycentral.com

 

[Occam's Banana]

I'm told that endorsements are meaningless so why get upset over it?

If they are meaningless then why do it?

Because the establishment is enamored of and obsessed with appearances over substance.

So Rand could very well be endorsing Romney precisely *because* doing so is ultimately meaningless.

If it keeps them "off his case" and free to do what he has been doing (which is overwhelmingly positive, despite the very few things he's actually done that I disagree with), then good for him!

The more I think about it, the more I like the possibility that Rand is just doing to them what they have always done to us - that is, telling them what they want to hear - that is, "blowing hot air."

 

[Fort Lauderdale]

Vice President Rand Paul or Ron Paul will make Mitt Romney end the fed, close all U.S. military bases around the world, bring all the troops home, close the Departments of Energy, Commerce, Interior, Education, and Housing and Urban Development, which would cut $2 trillion in spending. Paul to Romney: You do what I tell you to do! ...And when all U.S. military bases around the world have been permanently closed, and all the U.S. troops have been brought back home, there will be a parade on the streets New York City for the troops. Leading up to the parade, all networks will show a video montage of U.S. troops in action and then troops boarding planes and ships heading home to the U.S., with Mama, I'm Coming Home by Ozzy Osbourne playing in the background. The U.S. troops will then be sent to patrol our air and sea ports and our borders with Canada and Mexico. That is how terrorism will be defeated!

 

[Romulus]

yes, he is trying to build an alliance to go up against the Israeli lobby, and neocon interests. If he can get Mitt to help him in '16 that will be huge for him going up against the most powerful wing of the GOP, the neocon wing. If Mitt wins then atleast he will be on his good side and maybe he can get some leg. passed.

That an angle I didn't think of. But who would be running Romneys foreign policy? It would the same old Neocons, correct? I don't think neocons have anything against Romney at all.... I just don't see it. It'll be business as usual under a president Romney.

 

[TC95]

Well, if Romney is watching then he can watch me not vote for him in November. I don't care who his VP is. He'll never get my vote. He's another Obama and he knows it.

 

[LT for the Truth]

Well, if Romney is watching then he can watch me not vote for him in November. I don't care who his VP is. He'll never get my vote. He's another Obama and he knows it.

+1

 

[osan]

I don't care if Romney manages to get Jesus to run as VP with him he is not getting my vote. I would literally rather see Bammy get 4 more.

Have I missed something? Has Ron Paul quit? If not, then what is all this talk of a Mitten/Rand ticket?

As far as I am concerned it will be Ron Paul or Obammy in November. A vote for Romney by any RP supporter is a sell out and such persons can go pound salt. Now is not the time to jump ship, no matter how things may appear.

 

[Chester Copperpot]

I AM NOT VOTING FOR ROMNEY AND I AM DEFINITELY NOT VOTING FOR A ROMNEY / RAND PAUL TICKET!

Rand Paul 2016

Yeah Im with you

 

[DamianTV]

You think they are just WATCHING us?

No! They are POSING as us! They are signing up on the Ron Paul Forums and making disparaging remarks! These people need to be identified as Romney Shills!

 

[talkingpointes]

If Romney wins people the republicans will not primary for someone else in 2016, anyone mention that yet.

 

[Kylie]

You think they are just WATCHING us?

No! They are POSING as us! They are signing up on the Ron Paul Forums and making disparaging remarks! These people need to be identified as Romney Shills!

If Romney wins people the republicans will not primary for someone else in 2016, anyone mention that yet.

These.


I am not throwing in the towel. I am not standing down. I will not compromise my principles anymore.


IF YOU'RE WATCHING/POSTING/SEEING THIS.........I WILL NOT BE ASSIMILATED. I AM A FREE MAN.

I WILL VOTE FOR MY PRINCIPLES, NOT YOUR PARTY.

 

[nf7mate]

He's watching us, huh? Like literally watching this thread?

A picture speaks a thousand words. Or in this case, two.

 

[hard@work]

Romney is Watching Us

1. Full withdrawal from the global stage, including Korea and Japan. Word it to the masses however you wish.
2. State's rights on the "War on Drugs", abortion, and really just about everything else. Make an argument for hemp and smash Obama on the face with it, especially his drug usage and imprisonment of drug users.
3. No amnesty.
4. Competing currencies after an audit of the federal reserve.
5. Redact the unitary executive.
6. Denounce TARP
7. Denounce Romneycare (not Obamacare, but the original template)
8. Reign in the FDA, explain how you will use the free market to address the people's concerns on: Monsanto, Health Freedom
9. Reign in the Department of Education, explain to the people how stupid our kids are (forgive my lack of rhetoric)
10. Begin a campaign to push a culture of civil libertarianism and tolerance.

Pick any seven and you have my vote Mittens. #1 is not an option.

 

[osan]

1. Full withdrawal from the global stage, including Korea and Japan. Word it to the masses however you wish.
2. State's rights on the "War on Drugs", abortion, and really just about everything else. Make an argument for hemp and smash Obama on the face with it, especially his drug usage and imprisonment of drug users.
3. No amnesty.
4. Competing currencies after an audit of the federal reserve.
5. Redact the unitary executive.
6. Denounce TARP
7. Denounce Romneycare (not Obamacare, but the original template)
8. Reign in the FDA, explain how you will use the free market to address the people's concerns on: Monsanto, Health Freedom
9. Reign in the Department of Education, explain to the people how stupid our kids are (forgive my lack of rhetoric)
10. Begin a campaign to push a culture of civil libertarianism and tolerance.

Pick any seven and you have my vote Mittens. #1 is not an option.

This is myopic bullshit, pardon me please.

First of all, any SEVEN?!! Are you serious? Were I to produice such a list it would be at least 10x the size and EVERYTHING on it would be non-negotiable. You need to rethink your standards, I am sorry to say.

Furthermore, I would not give him my vote even if he made his promises because once in office he would conveniently forget them. The cloth from which Mittens is cut is no different than that of Bammy, the Shrubs, der Klinton, and even Reagan, the worship of whom I have never been able to fathom.

If it ain't a gonna be Ron, then better that Bammy gets it on a razor-thin margin with, say, 34% of the vote than to let this horse crap charade go on for another 4. At least the devil will have been partly unmasked.

 

[belian78]

I would consider voting for the ticket with DeMint on it.

Then you are no friend of Liberty or Freedom. Anyone even thinking of voting for Robamney I truly pity.