Romney, Gingrich and Santorum : we will make porn illegal, Spread This!

Status
Not open for further replies.

AngryCanadian

Member
Joined
Dec 22, 2011
Messages
10,257
SPREAD THIS TO VOTERS! ALERT!

http://thinkprogress.org/politics/2012/01/10/401517/three-leading-gop-nominees-porn/?mobile=nc
Last October, Morality In Media (MIM), the “leading national organization opposing pornography and indecency through public education and the application of the law,” launched an effort to get presidential candidates in both major parties to commit to strict enforcement of obscenity laws. In both face-to-face meetings and written statements, three candidates made this pledge: Newt Gingrich, Mitt Romney, and Rick Santorum.

When MIM’s Executive Director Dawn Hawkins asked former Speaker Gingrich if he will enforce existing laws that make distribution of hard-core adult pornography illegal, he responded: “Yes, I will appoint an Attorney General who will enforce these laws.”


So what you think Folks? a good weapon against the three?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
If you want to be strategic about distributing this, be sure not to post it on religious forums. And for the liberal outlets, make sure they understand what Ron Paul's position is in contrast. We need to sway the liberals who are disenchanted with Obama, and avoid butting heads with the religious right. If you want to sway the religious demographic, better to break the ice with the "Compassion" video...

 
Last edited:
I can't see ANYTHING beneficial in trying to make Ron Paul the porn candidate.
 
it's a bit of a stretch to say someone who is committing to enforce EXISTING obscenity laws is going to "ban porn". that said, i think all the laws are stupid and should be repealed, but let's not go too far out on a limb here.
 
i get it ya'll... don't make Ron the porn candidate. i can't help but form a slipper slope in my mind: with those 3 idiots, how long until even a husband and wife are bound under some prude's legislation making their own private, personal relationship subject to government regulation. or are we already there? i think we're already there.
 
If everyone who used the internet for porn donated $100 to Ron Paul he would raise billions.

Definitely the campaign should not be associated with this, but truth is that far more people in the USA actually use the internet for pornography that oppose it, so this information should be disseminated far and wide.

See http://theweek.com/article/index/204156/the-internet-porn-epidemic-by-the-numbers

Of course the intelligent thing to do is to 'segregate' porn on the internet like with the .xxx domain or something so that there is little chance of children inadvertently accessing adult material, but to those extremist perverts who are obsessed with other peoples sexual behavior intelligent isn't part of the equation.

They are just projecting their own insecurities and ignorance about their own impulses and inclinations onto everyone else.
 
Last edited:
Simple way to spread the santo... i mean message... after watching the orgy on your favorite porn site, leave a comment in the video comments.

Not that porn is ok to me...i can get real sex when i want... and the best part is that I don't have to log off afterwards.
 
What about the fact that the three who would oppose porn all want America to be like China but Ron doesn't? China has banned all porn.

There is no shortage of issues with which Ron Paul can distinguish himself from those clowns. There is no need to fish up one that can so easily be turned against him.
 
I can't see ANYTHING beneficial in trying to make Ron Paul the porn candidate.

Not just that, I think this organization is looking to enforce existing laws...

As opposed to "making porn illegal".

Not sure which laws they are referring to but they cant be very strict cause porn is all over the place.
 
Folks, it's not about the pornography per se.

It's about using pornography as an excuse to shut down the internet, or regulate it so much that it becomes worthless.

You don't have to support pornography to support free speech, but if you actively try and suppress pornography for adults for whatever reason you are automatically opposing free speech.

The fact that it's an emotional 'wedge issue' for many people is what makes it a tool for the power-hungry politicians to use to control everyone.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top