This article has a simple, yet glaring omission:
The people who were identifying playing cards did not have a lucrative vested interest the test results, nor did the testers.
The military industrial complex and the bankers own the media networks, which places a HUGE variable in the analogy. The Revolution is not being televised because the owners of the lion's share of federal welfare dollars own the television broadcast network.
This is a no-brainer. What car manufacturer would run ads (surrounded by "opinion pieces") promoting plug-in electric vehicles or bicycles?
If you offer the alternative solutions, especially when the current solutions have failed miserably, change happens far quicker. Buggy whip factories in the US did not disappear so quickly because a few wise men toured the country talking about the possible advantages of the automobile vs horse-and-carriage. Automobiles were made available, readily and at a cheap price, people saw others using them and immediately saw the advantages.
When candidate Obama drew 10,000 to hear him speak, the media responded (this is from USA Today):
Obama draws 10,000 to California rally
Regularly drawing crowds of 10,000 or more, Democrat Barack Obama has been likened to a rock star so often that it has worn thin.
Last month when RP drew a similar crowd, Fox and the Wash-Po said:
Where's Ron Paul? Campaign slows, though candidate shows no sign of quitting
Why Ron Paul rallies never translate into votes (a pathetic hit piece)
Resistance to a paradigm shift my ass.
Bosso