Rob Schneider says he has smoking gun on CDC vaccine-autism fraud

[mosquitobite]

He was trawling the Bill Gates thread, Hearken! I hear his approaching hoof beats.

The govt must not have sent out the talking points memo yet.

 

[William Tell]

The govt must not have sent out the talking points memo yet.

That, and he's busy researching the best vaccine to protect him from mosquitobites

 

[Zippyjuan]

Sorry- I thought somebody said they had absolute proof that vaccines caused Autism. I was still waiting for the proof to be presented.

 

[William Tell]

Speak of the devil!

 

[Zippyjuan]

Rise in Autism Rates go Hand-in-Hand with Increased Vaccinations​

The rise in autism rates also correlates with increased internet and cell phone usage. Does that make them a cause?
(Correlation is not causation)

During that time the definition of what is considered to be autism has also been greatly expanded- including people who would not have been considered autistic in the past (it is Autism Spectrum Disorder- a spectrum of symptoms- it is subjective and there is no definitive test to say if somebody is autistic or not).

 

[Weston White]

The rise in autism rates also correlates with increased internet and cell phone usage. Does that make them a cause?
(Correlation is not causation)

During that time the definition of what is considered to be autism has also been greatly expanded- including people who would not have been considered autistic in the past (it is Autism Spectrum Disorder- a spectrum of symptoms- it is subjective and there is no definitive test to say if somebody is autistic or not).

And neither is misdirection. (The Internet, really? Seriously, really?) You keep asking for proof and then pathetically disregard it whenever it is presented to you.

"Huh? Heidi Stevenson of Gaia Health easily debunked this flaw-filled study and concluded that it implicated the vaccine-autism link even more. The brains progressive enlarging synchronized with the CDC’s recommended vaccine schedule."

New Published Study Verifies Andrew Wakefield’s Research on Autism – Again (MMR Vaccine Causes Autism)​

Two landmark events – a government concession in the US Vaccine Court, and a groundbreaking scientific paper – confirm that physician, scientist, and Autism Media Channel [AMC] Director, Dr. Andrew Wakefield, and the parents were right all along.

In a recently published December 13, 2012 vaccine court ruling, hundreds of thousands of dollars were awarded to Ryan Mojabi, whose parents described how “MMR vaccinations,” caused a “severe and debilitating injury to his brain, diagnosed as Autism Spectrum Disorder (‘ASD’).”

Later the same month, the government suffered a second major defeat when young Emily Moller from Houston won compensation following vaccine-related brain injury that, once again, involved MMR and resulted in autism. The cases follow similar successful petitions in the Italian and US courts (including Hannah Poling [ii], Bailey Banks [iii], Misty Hyatt [iv], Kienan Freeman [v], Valentino Bocca [vi], and Julia Grimes [vii]) in which the governments conceded or the court ruled that vaccines had caused brain injury. In turn, this injury led to an ASD diagnosis. MMR vaccine was the common denominator in these cases.

And today, scientists and physicians from Wake Forest University, New York, and Venezuela, reported findings that not only confirm the presence of intestinal disease in children with autism and intestinal symptoms, but also indicate that this disease may be novel. [viii] Using sophisticated laboratory methods Dr. Steve Walker and his colleagues endorsed Wakefield’s original findings by showing molecular changes in the children’s intestinal tissues that were highly distinctive and clearly abnormal.

 

[Working Poor]

To me the best argument against vaccines is that they were developed by the Nazis. You can bet your bottom dollar that it is a eugenics program and they don't care how it harms the people who carry the genetics that they are meant to destroy.

 

[Zippyjuan]

To me the best argument against vaccines is that they were developed by the Nazis. You can bet your bottom dollar that it is a eugenics program and they don't care how it harms the people who carry the genetics that they are meant to destroy.

Vaccines were not invented by the Nazis.

http://www.historyofvaccines.org/content/timelines/all

The story of vaccines did not begin with the first vaccine–Edward Jenner’s use of material from cowpox pustules to provide protection against smallpox. Rather, it begins with the long history of infectious disease in humans, and in particular, with early uses of smallpox material to provide immunity to that disease.

Evidence exists that the Chinese employed smallpox inoculation (or variolation, as such use of smallpox material was called) as early as 1000 CE. It was practiced in Africa and Turkey as well, before it spread to Europe and the Americas.

Edward Jenner’s innovations, begun with his successful 1796 use of cowpox material to create immunity to smallpox, quickly made the practice widespread. His method underwent medical and technological changes over the next 200 years, and eventually resulted in the eradication of smallpox.

Louis Pasteur’s 1885 rabies vaccine was the next to make an impact on human disease. And then, at the dawn of bacteriology, developments rapidly followed. Antitoxins and vaccines against diphtheria, tetanus, anthrax, cholera, plague, typhoid, tuberculosis, and more were developed through the 1930s.

The middle of the 20th century was an active time for vaccine research and development. Methods for growing viruses in the laboratory led to rapid discoveries and innovations, including the creation of vaccines for polio. Researchers targeted other common childhood diseases such as measles, mumps, and rubella, and vaccines for these diseases reduced the disease burden greatly.

Though they did develop a typhus vaccine.
http://www.npr.org/2014/07/22/33373...ed-a-typhus-vaccine-in-a-fantastic-laboratory

If vaccines are a eugenics program they should be killing millions of people since millions of doses are given each year. How may people have been killed by vaccines? How many "destroyed"? Why have populations been rising more and more with more and more vaccines being administered?

 

[Working Poor]

Vaccines were not invented by the Nazis.

http://www.historyofvaccines.org/content/timelines/all


Though they did develop a typhus vaccine.
http://www.npr.org/2014/07/22/33373...ed-a-typhus-vaccine-in-a-fantastic-laboratory

If vaccines are a eugenics program they should be killing millions of people since millions of doses are given each year. How may people have been killed by vaccines? How many "destroyed"? Why have populations been rising more and more with more and more vaccines being administered?

Eugenics are being done in increments just like the eroding of our freedoms. I think you need to do some research on who owns big pharma pal...Let me ask you this what are the stats on the number of people with cancers who have been vaccinated?

 

[Zippyjuan]

Eugenics are being done in increments just like the eroding of our freedoms. I think you need to do some research on who owns big pharma pal...Let me ask you this what are the stats on the number of people with cancers who have been vaccinated?

What is the number of people whose cancer has actually been shown to be caused by vaccines since you seem to feel there is a connection? (over 90% of the US population has been vaccinated so certainly there are people with cancer who received some vaccine as well as people who never got cancer who also got some sort of vaccine- maybe the vaccines actually prevented their cancer?) A lot of people who received vaccines were involved in automobile accidents. Did the vaccine cause the accidents? (Correlation is not causation).

 

[donnay]

The SV40 Virus: Has Tainted Polio Vaccine Caused An Increase in Cancer?

Oral Presentation
Barbara Loe Fisher
Co-founder & President
National Vaccine Information Center
September 10, 2003

Subcommittee on Human Rights and Wellness
U.S. House Government Reform Committee
U.S. House of Representatives, Washington, D.C.
“The SV40 Virus: Has Tainted Polio Vaccine Caused an Increase in Cancer?”

My name is Barbara Loe Fisher and I am the mother of a DPT-vaccine injured son and the co-founder and president of the National Vaccine Information Center. I have spent the last 21 years working with other parents to prevent vaccine injuries and deaths through public education and defending the right to exercise informed consent to vaccination. (Coulter HL, Fisher BL. 1985. DPT: A Shot in the Dark. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.; Attachment 1 – Allen A. May 6, 2001. A Shot in the Dark. New York Times Magazine; Konrad W. and Ginsburg EH. June-July 2000. Who’s Calling the Shots? Offspring Magazine.)

The shocking story you are about to hear involves a pharmaceutical company which used monkeys to make polio vaccine, government health agencies responsible for making sure the vaccine was not contaminated with monkey viruses, and individuals who are now are dying from cancerous tumors that contain a monkey virus which appears to have contaminated that polio vaccine. At the heart of this tragic story is a violation of the public trust and the informed consent ethic. It is a story about what happens when the legal and moral duty for industry and government to insure that a vaccine will not harm individuals is sacrificed to insure acceptance and mass use of a vaccine by the entire population. It shows what can happen when Congress, which has oversight authority over federal health agencies, blindly trusts and fails to verify.

I began speaking and writing about monkey virus contamination of polio vaccines ten years ago when questions were raised in the medical literature about whether the use of monkeys infected with monkey viruses to produce oral polio vaccines was responsible for HIV and the AIDS epidemic. (Attachment 2: Kyle, W.S. 1992. Simian retroviruses, polio vaccine, and origin of AIDS. The Lancet 339: 600-601.) Between 1994 and 1997 I submitted several Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests to the government regarding testing of certain lots of oral polio vaccine for monkey virus contamination (Attachment 3 – Correspondence between BL Fisher and FDA) During the course of my research I discovered that it was well known that the first polio vaccine produced in the 1950’s – the inactivated polio vaccine created by Jonas Salk – was made using rhesus monkeys that were infected with a monkey virus called simian virus 40 or SV40.

It was in 1960 that an NIH scientist named Bernice Eddy discovered that rhesus monkey kidney cells used to make the Salk polio vaccine and experimental oral polio vaccines could cause cancer when injected into lab animals. Later that year the cancer-causing virus in the rhesus monkey kidney cells was identified as SV40 or simian virus 40, the 40th monkey virus to be discovered. (Shorter, e. 1987. The Health Century) Sadly, the American people were not told the truth about this in 1960. The SV40 contaminated stocks of Salk polio vaccine were never withdrawn from the market but continued to be given to American children until early 1963 with full knowledge of federal health agencies. Between 1955 and early 1963, nearly 100 million American children had been given polio vaccine contaminated with the monkey virus, SV40. (Institute of Medicine, National Academy of Sciences . 2002. Immunization Safety Review: SV40 Contamination of Polio Vaccine and Cancer. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press)

Today, U.S. federal health agencies admit the following two facts: 1. Salk polio vaccine released for public use between 1955 and 1963 was contaminated with SV40; and2. SV40 has been proven to cause cancer in animals. In fact, at a conference on SV-40 and human cancers held by the National Institutes of Health in 1997, which I attended, there was no disagreement among both government and non-government scientists about these two facts. The only disagreement was whether SV40 was actually being identified in the cancerous tumors of children and adults alive today and, if it was, whether the monkey virus was in fact responsible for their cancer. Non-government scientists working in independent labs around the world said, “Yes.” But the scientists connected with the U.S. government said “No.” (Transcript of FDA, CDC, NIH, NIP, NVPO January 27-28, 1997 Workshop on Simian Virus 40: A Possible Human Polyomavirus).

Today, there are scientists associated with the US government who continue to deny that SV40 causes human cancer or that SV40 associated cancers have had any effect on cancer rates since the early 1960’s. However, highly credentialed non-government scientists in multiple labs around the world continue to identify SV40 in human brain and lung cancers of children and adults and are finding that SV40 is also associated with bone cancers and Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphomas. The majority of these independent scientists have concluded that, yes, SV40 does cause human cancers. (Attachment 4 – Gazdar AE, Butel JS, Carbone M. 2002. SV40 and human tumours: myth, association or causality? Nature 2: 957-964) And in a report published in 2001, the Institute of Medicine Immunization Safety Review Committee stated that “in light of the biological evidence supporting the theory that SV40 contamination of polio vaccines could contribute to human cancers, the Committee recommends continued public health attention in the form of policy analysis, communication and targeted biological research.”

Up until this hearing today, the world scientific community has assumed that the only polio vaccine that was contaminated with SV40 and released for use by millions of Americans was Jonas Salk’s killed polio vaccine, which stopped being used in 1963 because it was replaced by Albert Sabin’s live oral polio vaccine. Why? Because the oral polio vaccine manufacturer and federal health agencies have told everyone that while the Salk vaccine was made using the SV40 infected rhesus monkey kidney tissues, after 1963 the oral polio vaccine was made using African Green monkeys, which are rarely infected with SV40. The vaccine manufacturer and government officials have insisted that the switch from rhesus monkey to African Green as well as testing protocols to detect SV40 prevented SV40 from contaminating oral polio vaccine after 1963. (Attachment 5: Statement of Bonnie Brock, Lederle, at Jan. 27-28, 1997 Workshop on SV40, transcript pages 300-307).

However, you will be presented with evidence today that suggests (Attachment 6: Kops SP. 2000. Oral polio vaccine and human cancer: a reassessment of SV40 as a contaminant based upon legal documents. Anticancer Research 20: 4745-4749. and Oral Testimony, Stanley Kops, Esq. Subcommittee on Human Rights and Wellness, US Government Reform Committee, September 10, 2003): 1. the original seed stocks of oral polio vaccine were made using the rhesus monkey and were contaminated with SV40;2. the major oral polio vaccine manufacturer did not adequately test their master seed stocks which reportedly contained SV40 but used them to produce vaccine released for use by American children from the 1960’s through the 1990’s;3. Federal regulatory agencies either did not know or knew and did not do anything about evidence that SV40 contaminated oral polio vaccine was released for use by the public from the 1960’s through the 1990’s; If SV40 contaminated rhesus monkeys were used to produce original oral polio vaccine seed stocks, and if these seed stocks were used to produce oral polio vaccine that was swallowed by American children through the 1990’s, and if SV40 does cause human brain, lung and bone cancers, then this could explain why children today, who were not born before 1963 and never got the SV40 contaminated Salk vaccines, are now sick and dying from cancerous tumors containing DNA from a monkey virus that was in those vaccines.

Pediatric brain cancer, once rare, rose during the past few decades according to the National Cancer Institute. But we don’t know how many of these children had or have SV40 in their brain tumors because nobody checks. How many of these children are sick and dying because the manufacturer of oral polio vaccine did not follow the rules and government health agencies didn’t enforce the rules? Since 1999, the US has discontinued use of the live oral polio vaccine and American children are now getting a killed polio vaccine that is reportedly SV40 free.

So why is it important today to find out whether or not the oral vaccine used to eradicate polio was in fact contaminated with a cancer causing monkey virus, and that the vaccine manufacturer knew it, and that government health agencies looked the other way? It is important because if it is true, then a precedent has been set. And that precedent may well be affecting decisions being made by government health agencies today about what kinds of animal tissue cultures vaccine manufacturers will be allowed to use to make new vaccines and what kinds of tests will be required to insure that the vaccines do not contain animal viruses or other contaminants.

Drugs and vaccines are very different. Drugs are used to cure sick people while vaccines are required by law in this country to be given to healthy people, primarily children. The standards for proof of safety and efficacy of vaccines should be higher than for any other pharmaceutical product we use.

I have just ended a four year term as the consumer voting member of the FDA Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee. My service on that committee gave me a new appreciation for the dedicated work of a number of fine scientists employed by the FDA, who take their regulatory duties very seriously and are working hard to regulate the vaccine industry with very limited resources and limited support within and outside of government. However, there are legitimate concerns which I and others have voiced in the past and continue to have about whether government standards for requiring vaccine manufacturers to prove the safety and efficacy of vaccines are high enough and whether the tests used by the manufacturers and the government to insure the safety of vaccines are good enough. (Attachment 7: National investigative news reports, including Wechsler P. November 11, 1996. A Shot in the Dark. New York Magazine.; Rock, A. December 1996: The Lethal Dangers of the Billion Dollar Vaccine Business. Money Magazine.; Bookchin D, Schumacher J. June 1997. The Lonely Crusade of Walter Kyle. Boston Magazine; Bookchin D., Schumacher J. February 2000: The Virus and the Vaccine. Atlantic Monthly Magazine.)

I urge this Committee and other congressional committees to carefully review the transcripts of meetings of the FDA Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee, specifically those which were held in 1998; 2000; 2001 and dealt with adventitious agent contamination of vaccines. Vaccine manufacturers are asking the FDA for permission to use cells from human and animal cancer tumors – that is cancer cells – to make HIV and other viral vaccines in the future that would be used on a mass basis by the American population. There has been a federal ban on use of cancer cells to produce vaccines since 1954 but active consideration is being given now to lift that ban despite the acknowledged risks of contamination with adventitious agents, including residual DNA and RNA. .(Attachment 8: Excerpt from November 19, 1998 FDA Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee meeting, transcript pages 29-52).

There is frank admission that the limitations of technology and lack of scientific knowledge means there can be no guarantee the vaccines will not be contaminated with substances that could prove harmful to humans one day. Nevertheless, there are plans to set allowable threshholds for adventitious agent contamination of vaccines being made out of cancer cells that would contain residual DNA and RNA. (Attachment 9: Excerpts from May 12, 2000 FDA Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee meeting transcript and Attachment 10: Excerpts from May 16, 2001 FDA Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee meeting transcript) I do not think Congress or the public understands any of this. There should be a much wider discussion in the larger scientific community outside of federal health agencies and the pharmaceutical industry, as well as in Congress and by the public at large before decisions are made to proceed with producing vaccines that use cancer cells and have legally allowable threshholds of adventitious agent contamination.

Past is often prologue. So much can be learned from understanding the mistakes of the past so that the same mistakes are not made in the future. Outstanding questions about the links between vaccines, government vaccine policies and the epidemic of chronic disease in our children, including autism, learning disabilities, ADHD, asthma, diabetes and, as we have discussed today, cancer are not going away. Questions about the links between vaccines that US military soldiers are required to take, including anthrax and smallpox vaccines, and the subsequent death or permanent health problems being suffered by those previously healthy, young recruits are not going away. They will never go away when the main defense of industry and government health officials is that when anything bad happens after vaccination it is just a coincidence. I can tell you, the American public, especially parents, are not buying it. And they shouldn’t buy it, especially when the kind of evidence that you will hear today suggests official government and industry denials are simply a way of avoiding taking responsibility for failing to do everything they can to minimize the risks of vaccines.

We owe it to our children and grandchildren to do everything we can to find out the truth about vaccine risks and make the mass vaccination system as safe as it can be. I believe that can only be done if Congress exercises more oversight authority over federal health agencies responsible for vaccine research, development, regulation, policymaking, promotion and monitoring of vaccine side effects. Conflict of interest legislation is urgently needed to separate government health agencies from financial and other ties with the vaccine industry so that government health officials can be free to do the job they are supposed to do: protect the health and well being of every American and not simply protect the vaccine supply. (Attachment 11: Investigative news report by UPI reporter Mark Benjamin. July 20, 2003. Chicago Sun Times, Washington Times)

Before I conclude, I would like to thank you, Chairman Burton, for all you have done during the past three years to investigate and bring to the attention of Congress and the American people the fact that our nation’s mass vaccination system must be reformed to make it safer. You have had the courage to stand up for those who suffer greatly when a vaccine’s risks turn out to be 100 percent for them or their child and you have done it against great opposition from powerful special interest groups with vested interests in protecting the status quo. Your tireless efforts on behalf of so many will not be in vain because the truth will shine bright and clear in the end no matter how long it takes.

http://www.nvic.org/vaccines-and-diseases/Polio-SV40/BLFTestimonySV40.aspx

 

[Zippyjuan]

They followed thousands of patients who were exposed to the SV40 for decades and no increased cancer rates have been observed.

http://jco.ascopubs.org/content/24/26/4356.full

A series of long-term follow-up studies have attempted to assess cancer incidence of SV40-exposed individuals over their lifetimes. One particular cohort of 1,073 newborn infants with documented exposure to SV40 through poliovirus vaccination has provided insight on the effects of SV40 exposure in the neonatal period. Studies of neonates inoculated with SV40-containing poliovirus vaccine and followed up after 6 to 8 years, 17 to 19 years, and 35 years all found no excess risk of cancer attributable to SV40 exposure.

Another study of US Army veterans assessed the likelihood of exposure to SV40-contaminated adenovirus vaccine (those individuals recruited between 1959 and 1961) in relation to the development of certain types of SV40-associated cancers. The study found no increased risk for brain tumors, mesothelioma, or non-Hodgkin's lymphoma associated with exposure to adenovirus vaccine despite the presence of potentially high titers of SV40 in the vaccine.60

Despite some limitations, taken together, these epidemiologic studies have been unable to demonstrate an association between SV40 exposure and cancer incidence. There was no trend of increased number of cancer cases relating to vaccine distribution in the years during and immediately after immunization with contaminated vaccine, and there has been no such trend in the population to date

So no, still no link between vaccines and cancer. Though there are attempts to create vaccines to prevent some types of cancer.

 

[donnay]

They followed thousands of patients who were exposed to the SV40 for decades and no increased cancer rates have been observed.

Thousands only? Out of 30 million the CDC admitted to? Right, Zippy.

CDC Admits as Many as 30 Million Americans Could be at Risk for Cancer Due to Polio Vaccine
http://www.thelibertybeacon.com/201...d-be-at-risk-for-cancer-due-to-polio-vaccine/

 

[dannno]

I think you need to do some research on who owns big pharma pal...

You may as well ask Dick Cheney to research the neocons.

 

[Weston White]

So no, still no link between vaccines and cancer.

Though there are attempts to create vaccines to prevent some types of cancer.

Oh like the HPV vaccine? Sure, sure, after all that one is just going over so greatly now isn’t it?

Alright so let’s see now, do I have this straight? You are willing to admit that vaccines have the potential to prevent cancer, but homeopathic medicine (e.g. homeoprophylaxis) is nothing more than pseudo-babble by morons imposing danger upon the unintelligent masses? …And still yet modern medical science uses such things as sterile maggots and leaches, placebos, etc. as an acceptable course of medical treatment?

 

[Weston White]

Vaccines were not invented by the Nazis.

However, modern eugenics and population control methods were.

Vaccines were not invented by the Nazis.

If vaccines are a eugenics program they should be killing millions of people since millions of doses are given each year.

It is designed to be a “soft-kill” procedure, the Third Reich attempted a “hard-kill” agenda and it was far too radical, catching international attention and concern even before the days of instant media.

How may people have been killed by vaccines? How many "destroyed"?

Truth is that it is not so readily apparent, nor is testing for reactions part of standard autopsy procedures. It is easy to seek out the cause of a smoking related death or a GSW victim, but a fatal reaction to a vaccine is quite apparently apples to oranges.

Why have populations been rising more and more with more and more vaccines being administered?

Why it is becoming increasingly difficult to become pregnant, why are miscarriages, stillbirths, SIDS, birth defects, mental health issues, lowered IQ, lifelong allergies, asthma, diabetes, obesity, heart attacks at 25, Alzheimer’s at 40, etc., all becoming more and more common?

 

[donnay]

Breaking: CDC whistleblower’s contact censored
Aug27 by Jon Rappoport



Brian Hooker’s journal paper deleted from site

The book burning begins

by Jon Rappoport

August 27, 2014

Gather ‘round in the village square. They’re burning books. The good obedient folk are shouting with glee…

These days it’s all done surgically, with a few clicks of a mouse.

The journal Translational Neurodegeneration has removed Brian Hooker’s analysis of the vaccine-autism connection from its website—after having published it.

Update: Brian Hooker’s deleted paper found. It is archived on the nih.gov site. Hat tip @4thAnon

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4128611/

CDC whistleblower William Thompson contacted Hooker months ago to tell him that yes, the CDC had committed egregious fraud in 2004, when it gave the MMR vaccine a free pass.

Based on information Thompson sent him, plus FOIA requests, Hooker put together a re-analysis of the 2004 CDC data and concluded: the vaccine causes great harm; there is a connection between the vaccine and autism; and African-American male babies are at a 300% increased risk of autism from the vaccine.

This is what the journal Translational Neurodegeneration published—and this is what it took down and censored this morning.

The public mustn’t be allowed to think. No, the recognized experts will do that. The shills will do that. The pharmaceutical cartel will do that. The control-freak teachers and school counselors will do that.

And if your child receives a vaccine and leaves this world or exists in half-light with brain damage, well, that is the price you must pay for supporting Official Truth.

Jon Rappoport

 

[donnay]

Mercury/vaccines/autism: more fraud at the CDC

by Jon Rappoport

August 27, 2014

www.nomorefakenews.com

In the 1990s, people around the world began to wake up and realize: there is mercury in vaccines.

Mercury.

“That’s a poison, isn’t it? Warnings are issued about eating fish laced with mercury…but injecting it is safe?”

The public reaction was swift, explosive, instinctive, and correct: “They’re poisoning us and our children.”

Some of this poisoning was called autism. Some of it was called “neuro-developmental delay.” There were other names and categories.

The uproar was so loud, Congress was forced to act. In 1997, they ordered the FDA to examine the situation.

So in June of 2000, three full years later, because the federal government really cares but only cares slowly, the famous Simpsonwood Meeting convened (see also here).

The star of that meeting was a CDC scientist named Thomas Verstraeten. Tommy had done extensive work on vaccines and neuro-developmental delay. It was so extensive almost nobody could understand it.

At Simpsonwood, a gaggle of other scientists, FDA and CDC people, and pharma types sat in their chairs while Tommy showed mind-numbing slide after slide and explained each one.

The CDC people prayed Tommy would be convincing. After all, the CDC is in charge of vaccine safety and also buys billions of dollars of vaccines, which it distributes to public health agencies in all 50 states.

Tommy, with his slide show, explained he had homed in on neuro-developmental delay in children, and had examined many different groupings of vaccinated children to discover a connection, if any, to the vaccines.

There is a transcript of the whole Simpsonwood Meeting. 286 pages. It’s like reading the Talmud backwards or an old Manhattan phone book whose pages have been taken out of alphabetical order.

Tommy’s thrust, of course, was to exonerate mercury in vaccines and give these vaccines a free pass. Which he eventually did, in the final version of a study published three times.

In the Simpsonwood transcript, the real explosion comes on page 43. No one, to my knowledge, has emphasized this enough.

On page 43, a Dr. Rapin asks Tommy a basic question:

“How did they make these diagnoses [of neuro-developmental delay, aka neurological damage, in the children you’re tracking]?”

Tommy replies: “What I am presenting to you now is just the results of the automated data. That means I don’t know anything about how these diagnoses were made…[but later in my presentation we’ll be in a] better position, at least for some of the outcomes [of neuro-developmental delay] to tell you how they were diagnosed.”

Translation. The whole presentation has just fallen apart.

Continued...

 

[donnay]

CDC scientific fraud: an update on Dr. Poul Thorsen who authored fraudulent study 'disproving' vaccine-autism connection and stole millions of dollars

Thursday, August 28, 2014
by: Jonathan Benson

The very legitimacy of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) as a trustworthy safeguard of public health hangs in the balance as evidence continues to emerge about rampant deception, fraud and even money laundering within the agency. Specifically with regard to vaccines and autism, key players involved in the propaganda campaign to deny this link are now being exposed as liars working on behalf of the vaccine industry.

One such liar is Dr. Poul Thorsen, a Danish scientist who was indicted for stealing millions of dollars from the CDC and using it to cover up vaccine dangers. Thorsen, as you may recall, was heavily involved in producing a stream of fraudulent studies that supposedly "disproved" the now-evident link between vaccines and autism. The CDC has also continually cited Thorsen's studies as "evidence" that vaccines are safe, declaring the debate to be over in light of their findings.

But, one by one, these and various other studies, including a prominent one published in the journal Pediatrics, are being called into question due to fraud and author conflicts of interest. And to make matters worse, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) has yet to even follow through with its indictment of Thorsen, who continues to produce phony studies from his cozy position at Sygehus Lillebaelt Hospital in Kolding, Denmark.

Thorsen funneled millions of taxpayer dollars toward vaccine-autism coverup

As we reported back in 2011, Thorsen had previously worked for the CDC, overseeing millions of dollars' worth of grant money that we now know was used to prop up the myth that vaccines are safe. The CDC had long perpetuated this myth, so it was in the agency's best interests to quell public fears by generating a series of studies to this end.

Continued...

 

[donnay]

The Big One: CDC whistleblower goes public Now
CDC whistleblower admits fraud publicly: releases Aug. 27 statement!

by Jon Rappoport | Infowars.com | August 28, 2014

Here it is. All the people who said we were making it up, inventing charges of fraud at the CDC…well, here it is. CDC Whistleblower William Thompson’s own statement, released from his lawyer’s office today.

I’ll have more to say about Thompson’s confession. But for now, read his words, particularly the opening. The 2004 CDC study on the MMR vaccine and autism was cooked. It was fraud.

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE-AUGUST 27,2014

STATEMENT OF WILLIAM W. THOMPSON, Ph.D., REGARDING THE 2004 ARTICLE EXAMINING THE POSSIBILITY OF A RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN MMR VACCINE AND AUTISM

My name is William Thompson. I am a Senior Scientist with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, where I have worked since 1998.

I regret that my coauthors and I omitted statistically significant information in our 2004 article published in the journal Pediatrics. The omitted data suggested that African American males who received the MMR vaccine before age 36 months were at increased risk for autism. Decisions were made regarding which findings to report after the data were collected, and I believe that the final study protocol was not followed.

I want to be absolutely clear that I believe vaccines have saved and continue to save countless lives. I would never suggest that any parent avoid vaccinating children of any race. Vaccines prevent serious diseases, and the risks associated with their administration are vastly outweighed by their individual and societal benefits.

My concern has been the decision to omit relevant findings in a particular study for a particular sub* group for a particular vaccine. There have always been recognized risks for vaccination and I believe it is the responsibility of the CDC to properly convey the risks associated with receipt of those vaccines.

I have had many discussions with Dr. Brian Hooker over the last 10 months regarding studies the CDC has carried out regarding vaccines and neurodevelopmental outcomes including autism spectrum disorders. I share his belief that CDC decision-making and analyses should be transparent. I was not, however, aware that he was recording any of our conversations, nor was I given any choice regarding whether my name would be made public or my voice would be put on the Internet.

I am grateful for the many supportive e-mails that I have received over the last several days.

Continued...