RIP: Charlie Kirk Assassinated at Event in Utah

[Anti Federalist]

 

[unknown]

 

[ClaytonB]

 

[unknown]

That's this guy:

August 13th:

 

[acptulsa]

 

[jmdrake]

I didn't know much about Charlie Kirk before his assassination, and I didn't have any idea who Erika Kirk was.

But I did see video of her in the (leather?) pants. It seemed to be inappropriate. From what little I have seen of her, she comes off as a phony.

I did read that she used to be in beauty pagents, and probably likes the spotlight. Is she going for the rockstar look here, or is this supposed to be a casual look? Jeans would have been more appropriate if it was intended to be casual.

I could let the leather pants slide, but her cradling JD Vance's head like she was about to kiss him was very wierd.

 

[acptulsa]

I could let the leather pants slide, but her cradling JD Vance's head like she was about to kiss him was very wierd.

Saying she has been enigmatic the whole time seems like understatement to me.

 

[acptulsa]

Did they deliberately choose Shapiro knowing that a certain percentage of the population would never listen to him just because of that voice? Let's choose someone to sling our most outrageous bull who no reasonable person would ever listen to beyond five words, so reasonable people don't notice how outrageous we really are.

 

[Anti Globalist]

I could let the leather pants slide, but her cradling JD Vance's head like she was about to kiss him was very wierd.

Clearly JD Vance is going to divorce from his wife and start dating Erika Kirk.

 

[acptulsa]

 

[acptulsa]

Nice overview

 

[unknown]

 

[unknown]

 

[acptulsa]

 

[osan]

Sure, sincere questions are always allowed. Especially in Clown World. But the firestorm of hatred directed at Erika after Charlie Kirk's most-public murder is not "questions". Those are assertions. Baseless assertions.

Fair enough.

 

[Snowball]

I listened to this last night.

Laura Wood does a really good job talking about why she doesn't believe CK was assassinated at all.

you can ony dl the talk directly from isoc.ws until the 15th when it is replaced with the next monthly interview

here is a permanent link if you encouter this post post-15th:

Charlie Kirk Hoax - isocws

Charlie Kirk Hoax - isocws download from 4shared

www.4shared.com

website interview source: isoc.ws

 

[acptulsa]

I listened to this last night.

Laura Wood does a really good job talking about why she doesn't believe CK was assassinated at all.

you can ony dl the talk directly from isoc.ws until the 15th when it is replaced with the next monthly interview

here is a permanent link if you encouter this post post-15th:

Charlie Kirk Hoax - isocws

Charlie Kirk Hoax - isocws download from 4shared

www.4shared.com

website interview source: isoc.ws

I haven't listened to it yet so I'm not vouching for it. But you can avoid downloading it --for the moment, as noted -- and avoid loading the 4shared app from Google, by going here and hitting "play":

ISOC – In the Spirit of Chartres Committee

www.isoc.ws

 

[Snowball]

I haven't listened to it yet so I'm not vouching for it. But you can avoid downloading it --for the moment, as noted -- and avoid loading the 4shared app from Google, by going here and hitting "play":

ISOC – In the Spirit of Chartres Committee

www.isoc.ws

I posted it into 4shared it is not owned by Google, as far as I'm aware.
Reason why I did it -- she only keeps it up on the site until it is replaced with the next interview
which is usually monthly. Then it goes into archives which are not free.
But my link will keep it available here past the 15th.
She has Dan McAdams coming up on the 15th of Jan. Gary Giuffre and Jim Condit Jr. are my favorite of her guests.

 

[acptulsa]

I posted it into 4shared it is not owned by Google, as far as I'm aware.

But where except Play Store can you get the app?

Reason why I did it -- she only keeps it up on the site until it is replaced with the next interview...

Yes, I understood that. I just told them how to listen without downloading anything. And yes, I obviously believe you when you say that can only happen for a limited time.

That said, I'm half an hour in to this hour and a quarter and about to give up. She's just pointing out the inconsistencies that have already been noted in this thread. Her big trip appears to be that there weren't any overt and obvious efforts to stop the bleeding, but if we were told the truth about the massive spinal cord damage, his heart wasn't pumping blood out of him. It was doing nothing.

She appears to be operating on the assumption that nobody could have violated so many of the usual protocols regarding murder scenes if this were really a murder scene. But if there's a conspiracy involving the local officials, obviously they can and might well violate all the rules of evidence at a real crime scene. It's a bad assumption.

So, I just gave up.

 

[acptulsa]

Spinning conspiracies around Candace Owens.