RIP: Charlie Kirk Assassinated at Event in Utah

https://x.com/Howlingmutant0/status/1966492591945289743
upload.png
 
https://x.com/michaeljknowles/status/1966627316551016927

In the wake of Charlie's assassination, many people are demanding that we redouble our devotion to the "free marketplace of ideas." The call seems at first glance courageous and noble. In reality, it is reckless and impractical. We had an open marketplace of ideas; the Left shot it up.

Not only have extreme leftists committed violence in the marketplace of ideas; more scandalous still, mainstream left-wing voices have cheered and made light of the violence. There can be no open marketplace—of ideas or anything else—under such conditions.

Marketplaces require rules, confidence, and common media of exchange. They require, in other words, order. Liberty requires order. One cannot be both free and undisciplined, for instance, or free and ignorant. We know this philosophically, and we also know it intuitively. It's why we don't let toddlers vote.

What we require now is the reassertion of order. We must insist upon the acceptance of basic truths and moral goods, not as the asymptotic goal of endless debate but as the axiomatic foundation without which debate cannot occur. We must foreclose certain antisocial behaviors and suicidal ideologies. We must, to borrow a phrase from Chesterton, stop "the thought that stops thought."

In practical terms, this means we must stigmatize certain evil ideas and behaviors, and we must ostracize people who insist upon them. More practically, this means that people who persist in such disorder should lose their social standing. In certain cases, they should lose their jobs. There must be consequences.

With any political reform, it is wise to err on the side of caution. The offenses that merit such ostracism should be particularly egregious. A good place to begin would be with those who celebrate the murder of an innocent man.



 
why don't we know the only 2 sources of cell phone video (front and side) of the shooting
and how did they upload it everywhere online in less than minutes???????????


Been reading some other forums.

Apparently, this University has well over 1000+ cameras.

So far, in terms of University footage, we've essentially been shown 3 low resolution stills of the "shooter" and 1 video of the "shooter" dropping from a roof.
 
Kari Lake's speech at Charlie Kirk's memorial. Worth watching all the way through...



This isn't just political anymore. This is "up-leveling". If you thought Clown World has been wild until now, it's about to get a whole lot wilder. I don't give a hoot about mid-terms or US political parties. The spiritual war is heating up and the demons in human skinsuits are already feeling that heat. There will be no temperature reductions. For them, the temperature is only going one direction... forever up.
 
Trying to desperately counter Charlie pivoting away from Izrael over the past few weeks.

Fucking weirdos.

 
Now, that's the way you communicate a point of view or opinion, referring to the reply below.



"Please watch closely when Charlie Kirk raises the question about Israel.

Look at Ben Shapiro's face in that very moment.

His body language shifts within milliseconds: the flash of surprise, the tightening jaw, the flicker of anger he tries to suppress.

He wasn't expecting this question - least of all from Kirk. And you can see it.

Notice how he shakes his head in denial while nodding in reluctant agreement - the perfect metaphor for a man caught between instinct and calculation.

Outwardly affirming, inwardly resisting.

Ask yourself: why would such a simple question provoke such a crack in composure?

Why does his body betray emotions his words work to hide?

Watch again, not for what he says, but for what his face reveals before the words arrive."
 
Last edited:
Trying to desperately counter Charlie pivoting away from Izrael over the past few weeks.

Fucking weirdos.



That's so reprehensible on so many levels that it's easy to overlook the fact that it contains a textbook example of how partisanship is used to control people. They flash a pic of Thunberg using her extra-ugly face and all but say, if you think the mass extermination in Gaza is bad then you must think Greta's a hottie. Be a good Republican -- give Israel a pass no matter what it does.

Could they make the manipulation any more obvious?
 
Back
Top