RIP: Charlie Kirk Assassinated at Event in Utah

68c2e3acb8b46.webp


Zionists are far, far more famous for that.
 



"So what we’ve got so far


- They wouldn’t shoot at someone obvious like Nick Fuentes, as that would just prove him right. It’s better to smear them like an extremist


- But they are worried about a moderate like Charlie making this kind of uncomfortable connections, as his audience are moderates who may have not made these connections yet, and they want to keep the moderates as far from these questions as possible


- Therefore by shooting Charlie they are hoping to


1) blame it on Islamists (bc Charlie was rasing some concern about Islam);


2) send a message to other journalists;


3) divide people further, so that the ones who have already made the connections are to be labeled as extremists, and everyone else is not to cross that line"

Wow! What a turnaround from this....

 

So....1) I notice that everyone he threw a hat to was white and they didn't seem to have a problem accepting the hats and 2) blacks who support MAGA at this point are grifters and tokens anyway.



Oh and 3) Do we know whether those hats were for sale or were being given away? I don't see a for sale sign. Just curious.
 
I don't do Bluesky and don't like bans, but it's really an asshole thing to say. Especially without the context. Here's the full bit:
Ironically Charlie Kirk said "The Second Amendment is not about hunting" and he was killed with a hunting rifle.
 
CIA doesn't do domestic terrorists.

They along with our military operate outside of US soil primarily.

If the attack was a foreign terrorist then you could blame the CIA and we did after 9/11.

Governor Ventura disclosed that there were CIA agents operating at every level within his state government.

And that CIA agents are planted within every state government in the US.

And yes, the CIA/Mossad was primarily responsible for 9/11.
 


If Destiny was shot by a sniper at a speaking event, I would consider it a tragic assault on the 1st Amendment. I despise everything that Destiny stands for. He comes across to me as an absolute slime-ball of a person. I can't imagine dealing with someone with his mentality on a customer-service call, for example, it must be unendurable. Nevertheless, he has the right to peacefully speak his opinion, and if retarded people want to listen to that, well, what can you say, the world is messed-up. But if the tables were turned, I would not be celebrating it, nor would I "stand with" (hate that term) anybody who did, in fact, I would vehemently oppose them, even if they were "conservative" or "libertarian". And Destiny is way further left than Charlie Kirk was to the right.

The Left's reaction to the Kirk shooting tells you everything you need to know. The Left has a violence problem, and it's time we as a country had a national dialogue about that. What do the leftists call that... yeah, an intervention. It's time for an intervention, or even a national struggle session, over the Left's addiction to political violence...
 
The Left has a violence problem, and it's time we as a country had a national dialogue about that. What do the leftists call that... yeah, an intervention. It's time for an intervention, or even a national struggle session, over the Left's addiction to political violence...

Zionists do too, and I still consider them to be the more immediate problem. Let's start there, and see what other problems still persist when we're done.

I don't see any reason to believe that guy is a leftist. Looks more like a likely useful idiot for Zion to me.
 
At first I thought, surely it was some trantifa lunatic. But now as some suggest it’s an attempt to start a civil war, likely from another country. There’a no denying this is how we’ve seen our own government turds initiate regime change in other countries so many times. (Of course, ya can’t rule out that it is people within our own government.)

So now I think the trans implications are probably a red herring to mislead - too obvious. It would make sense that zionists & Netanyahu wanted Kirk dead and our political leadership scrambled up for their somewhat lagging support. But Zelensky’s people hated Kirk too. He referred to Zelensky as a “petulant child responsible for a million deaths”, and an “international welfare queen.”

I hope “conservatives” can maintain cool heads for now. If/when some perceived “retaliation” occurs over the next few days - look out!

By the way, that photo of the latest suspect - that’s a female. [edit: I might be wrong.] (I was an artist and studied anatomy.) That scrawny person is no guy and not likely on hormones which would beef her up. It appears to have other clothing on underneath, too - probably something frilly to look completely different post-murder.
AA1Mmwil.img
 
Last edited:
By the way, that photo of the latest suspect - that’s a female.

That was running around the back of my head, but for some reason (the chin?) I rejected it. But now that you say it out loud, I can't reject it.

If anyone else out there is saying it, the search algorithms are burying them, because I can't find it. But there's no doubt this is a pretty brilliant strategy, along with some makeup:

It appears to have other clothing on underneath, too - probably something frilly to look completely different post-murder.

If they'd release the vid from which they took the stills they're circulating, we could get a better idea from watching the psycho move.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top